My decals have always been bland, the best one I ever had was this
everything other than that is usually a Swedish flag and the Spookston decal
1 Like
I’ve seen some very clever mixing of those slogans. Yours is good. My only real attempt was this anti-smoking campaign:
I play mid, not low, tiers as that is where skill is the most apparent. Top tier does not appeal to me at all as the gameplay is the worst there. Cas is also significantly less rewarding. If I wanted to club I would go play 1.0-2.7. You talk about not using those vehicles as good as you can now, yet you still somehow struggle to get above a 1 kd in almost every vehicle you play? How is that improvement?
10/10, beautiful
2 Likes
The vehicles you have most battles in were all under BRd at one stage or another.
for germany for example you used only the panther A for a long time. the battles show that.
Look at the chinese tanks.
Or the isreali tanks.
theyve got either a 1.0 or just about that.
Im working back through what ive got to platue the KD out.
the top vehicle of my stats is what? the magach 3 for USA? ive not touched it in about 2 years.
See what i mean. so yes it is improvement across most tanks im actively using.
Compared to tanks at 5.0/ 6.0 that i rarely touch as I havent had to for years.
Un
skill is most apparent as in the skill required by players to excel?
or are you saying all the best players are at mid BRs cause they arent. at all
there are some good players there, but most people ive seen that are right good are sitting at a higher BR.
now this is absolutely nothing to do with the post at hand. So until you say something about the post ill choose not to respond.
ive been chinned one too many times for going off topic. ( you also ignored most of what i said and are still focusing entirely on my stats with vehicles i dont use. so yeah.
Cas is less rewarding? By whos decree ?.
Youve got far more to worry about at top tier cas, lower brs its essentially dropping bombs on people who arent reliably able to fight back
So, just putting this out there, you don’t buff something and then move it, you buff it, check its performance, then move it.
The T92 is a very flat tank, and can be hard to spot. Its armor is pretty decent even if you hit the commander / gunner hatch it usually flys straight through. It also gets Heat-fs
The Tiger 105 & H are good in their own rights, but the 105 has less of a frontal weak point due to the increased mantle size.
Is-6 is hardly usable unless you get a full or minor downtier. Even then, pretty much every 6.7 can kill you via the gunner optic, or they have HEAT
Kinda the same boat for the IS-3
The T-54s are less survival than the is-3 or 6 but boast a quicker reload with HEAT in the later 7.7-8.0 ones.
The T-80Us being the same br as a Leo2a7V while having none of the armor, for a “correction” to their real life reload, (as the hstvl just got, with no br movement) is a balancing factor.
ST-A3 & Type 61 were super easy to spade and players are often playing it with their brain turned off, if they remain their current br, they should have the HEAT-FS removed.
AMX-50 T090 is in no way better than the Somua, other than speed. Somua is the go to, to bully the enemy tanks.
M4FL10 is meant to be played as a sniper in any BR, therefore making it 5.3 where it may have to slightly aim won’t hurt it. All around “jack of all trades” while boasting a high fire rate and good pen.
1 Like
The dardo is terrible, but so is the Vcc-80/ 30.
And making the dardo a 9.7 helps Italy’s lineups a bit as they are scattered all over.
The bkan is a great multi role, but a glass cannon, making it a 7.0 won’t destroy its ability. It fires HE
The USH and fox were by far the easier tanks I have ever played to spade / get nukes in. Both should go up in br.
1 Like
Join my discord, you’ll see it’s just a meme lol
2 Likes
it always was.
then somehow became this actual thing people believed xD.
US air dominates sweden ground dominates followed by Germany then russia.
Germany is better BR for BR than most if not all trees in the game as well overall.
2 Likes
BR for BR, Germany is roughly equal to US and Russia in ground. All three of those are generally better than the minor nations, with Sweden sometimes being better than the other minor nations as well.
1 Like
Sweden and France can be better than the big 3 sometimes. All depends on how the cards line up.
2 Likes
Sweden commonly has a better overall playerbase and they’ve got really good equipment. I’d argue France and Japan can occasionally beat out the big 3 at certain BRs, though most commonly just Sweden and France
2 Likes
what do you consider a good player? Because I can with 100% confidence tell you that the majority of the highest skilled in terms of gameplay and most experienced players are playing 5.0-7.7, as that is where the gameplay is the best. Top tier cas is less rewarding because it requires very very little skill to do well in.
I would say the experienced or good players, have on average a 0.85 kd or higher and a win rate above 45%
1 Like
BS, i bought the T29 in the last anniversary and is one of the most easy to play tanks i played since long time ago.
67% win ratio and near 1 to 5 in K/D ratio. T29 is tronger and better tank than any of Tiger 2.
2 Likes
You got a source for that ? Or just trust me.bro ?
In my experience they’re between 6.7 and 8.7
5.0 is clubbing territory, if i go grab a 5.0 lineup for germany, ussr or USA, hell even britain ill.go bring my KD up.
How would you know?
Theres
1 some potent spaa, especially pantsir.
2 there is now some of the most capable multi role platforms in the world in game with access to ARH missiles.
3 there are even designated fighters that are slinging said arh missiles.
You wanna use CAS at top tier you better get your ass moving and be paying attention to literally everything…
At 5.7 CAS is beyond oppressive and abused.
Spaa can rarely can keep up, you have powerful props, in the US case with large bomb loads.
To say its more skilled without any reasoning is bull.
2 Likes
-
I never said it was a bad tank, it used to sit in a far more oppressive spot.
-
Its not a difficult tank to use, nor are the tiger 2s specifically the SLA.
the tank is stronger ? Or does it suit your playstyle better ?
The t29 is a good tank.
The tiger 2 H’s specifically are good tanks too.
On paper as well they both are similar to one another, gameplay wise tiger 2 is better for longer range engagements, has better mobility, and more effective over all armour on the hull.and turret.
All this talks making me feel like going back to them.
Got a win rate of over 50 percent and an average KD for all.of grb of about 0.79 also the game doesn’t show a full KD record as it doesnt include assists.
Nor does it show caps for game involvement.
However as i said previously i spent a long time playing badly.
Only with meeting and playing with better folks have i.gotten better.
LMAO you could put in 6.7 and the gun would still suck. If you have ever played you know it how bad the gun is. After the APDS changes you dont do any post pen and ricochet from everything.
1 Like
90% of the proposed changes here are one big joke
3 Likes