Well the jumbo was nerfed from the br where the tiger was to it’s current br, so youre supporting the US nerf.
Jumbo was moved up because he perform extremly well in 6.3 Right now is fine and about Tigers, all are perfect in his actual BRs. (Of course for russian mains are op of courseee).
Im talking about support nerfs, why do you think i want closed this nosense ?? i dont support any of BR proposed for USA,Germany or Soviets.
you should also move up the SK-105 then
1 Like
I also forgot about that one
The Sweden one has better armor though. Over the Zis
no lol
Out of all the rounds I fired from the conquerer into an enemy, only a few shattered, and they are my fault for terrible shot placement.
Even bad shots still lead to massive disablement or destruction.
(Edited because auto correct made my English sound super broken)
Seems Statshark.
1 Like
Which sounds to be another unreliable source.
T54E2 7.7 → 7.3
This tank is just awful, it has no redeemable qualities. It’s a significantly worse M48 (which is already an incredibly average tank) at the same BR.
The ammo options are pretty awful. The AP has barely any pen for the caliber, the APDS does almost no damage, and the HEATFS is HEATFS. It’s pretty much impossible to one tap things, and the damage you do is pretty negligible.
You also have a 10 second reload aced, more than 3 seconds longer than the M48 for an objectively worse gun (M48 has APHE and HEATFS, at least, and the 90mm HEATFS only loses 60mm of pen compared to 105mm HEATFS.).
Your armor might seem okay and that’s true for the hull. But go to the armor analysis and you’ll realize that your turret cheeks can be penned by almost anything. The neck of the turret is a mere ~160mm (pennable by the 17-pounder and KwK42) and the “pike” on the cheek is literally about 110mm thick. Not to mention, you have the famous American cupola which loves to get you killed.
As for mobility, it’s… okay. Slightly slower than the M48 but still okay. It won’t win any races but it’s also not obnoxiously slow.
There are literally no positives to using it or any quirks you can take advantage of. It’s just dogsh*t. Mediocre or bad at everything.
2 Likes
Can you make a short a sweet version so I can add it?
I know I’m not the one in the conversation but would this work for you?
T54E2 7.7-7.3, severely underwhelming rounds, weak turret armor, worse gun compared to other vehicles at the tier, long reload, overall mediocre
why is that the same br as the t54e1 on the first place
Gaijoobles doing Gaijooble things ig, tbf I’m not the original person in this conversation
“they both have the same name but different number, must be the same”
Maybe it could get a slight reload buff instead of a downtier, but I’ll have to test it tomorrow.
@MrBombastic8 do you just spew out mis-information Bomb?
They aren’t the same br…
1 Like
It had 105mm heat
And a damn post 400 pen apds which is absolutely phenomenal.
The t54E2 i take in an 8.3 lineup as it can roll up there.
The t54E2 is an actually well balanced tank at 7.7 dunno what this dude means.
“Insufficient ammo” what heat FS and a 105mm APDS
2 Likes
Beats me. That’s why I said perhaps a slight reload buff would be better. Same thing with the Aubl-74 HVG. Since it has good rounds, but terrible damage in the Aubl, thus a reload buff would help it