@Nowel
I try again.
According to you, the web can track 600 battles is not a reliable source due the low number of battles. So if this is not enough for support a hipotetical BR change for sure the experience of a single player should be much much reliable, yes or no???
they are not.
I will end it here since it seems like there is no point to even argue if you cant compredhend basic statistics principles and you seem to ignore a show case as to how low sample sizes are missleading.
1 Like
Yeah, I do partially agree with the T-64 thing but Leo A1A1s are 9.0 now aren’t they?
T-64s struggle in anything 0.7 br or higher, and may bounce some rounds in 0.3 higher matches.
I could swap the Beglit to 9.7, but it’s still extremely potent… that’s why I say it should be 10.7, especially given I moved the 2s38 to 10.7
Both KVs going down seems a little off, the Swedish one has the better turret which lends it to have far better survivability as that’s the weak point on the KV-1s. That’s why they should still have a br gap, but just a minor one.
Have you played the obj.122? It’s got better angling than the T-62 and often bounces rounds, while being quite mobile and having the ATGMs as backup weapons.
If i remember correctly, thunderskill only accounts for those whom signed up for it, meaning a lot of players don’t even use it.
So it’s a bit odd @Panzerknacker_31 is trying to use it as a source
And what kind of source are you using for your conclussions???
Probably because he was mad that people want to send up the clovis with clear advatages from the tt equivalent and since he fail at acting like a victim he tried to go with the Whataboutism route.
2 Likes
iirc the type 69 also have the upgraded engine
Nah, i dont care the Clovis, im mad how people think Germany need 14 nerfs or USA 8 nerfs and Soviets (the most stupid and op nation in the game) need more lower BRs LOL.
Exactly :)
You should’t but in this game - have and probably will again, nothings certain in War thunder. You can kill a tiger with an M22 ( not that was a troll and half in game lol ), the M5a1 has 87mm pen at short range!
Not especially, you use it - you’re an experienced player - you know how to use it!
Having a high KD really doesn’t mean much, Ive seen t-34 players with a 8-1 KD (very recently and even posdted in discord about it as that was the highest I’ve ever seen in game, but not all players can get that… again Skill matters, ive only got a 2/1 KD on both out of aprox 750 matches each.
1 Like
Sure buddy, but for some reason you seem to only cry about the german “nerf”…
But that doesn’t mean the tiger is bad.
But it’s by far my best performing tank. Even the seal clubbing machine of the Ka-Chi still performs worse.
The KV-1E and B need to go up. Their armour for their BR is unreasonable, and they don’t have any distinct downsides apart from poor mobility and an OK gun.
So they cant go anywhere, cant kill much as you stated with an OK guy at its Current BR, soooo increase its BR to become - cant go anywhere, bad gun, but hey - armor can, oh wait - cant take it anymore.!
Sorry - I 100% disagree. perfect exactly where it is.
1 Like
…
The kv1s at 4.7 keeps using pretty much the same OK gun just 10mm more of pen and the apcr which i would say it is a fair trade for it extra armor of those two
1 Like
Thats is not support a nerf just pointed why Jumbo 76 is better than Tiger.
Well the jumbo was nerfed from the br where the tiger was to it’s current br, so youre supporting the US nerf.
Jumbo was moved up because he perform extremly well in 6.3 Right now is fine and about Tigers, all are perfect in his actual BRs. (Of course for russian mains are op of courseee).
Im talking about support nerfs, why do you think i want closed this nosense ?? i dont support any of BR proposed for USA,Germany or Soviets.