For a tank at 7.7 with a post 400 pen APDS with about 140 angled pen. Which isnt seen until about 8.7 ish on tanks.
Why summerise a tank, twice I may add, if you haven’t used it . why not let @jspene summerise it.
BTW this is incorrect, I use both the T54E1 and E2 and the APDS slams expecially for 7.7
The gun is a 105mm VS a 90MM cannon at 7.7, the 105 is substantially more damaging when it penetrates.
The turrets been okay for me, this though, with the PZH2000 and stuff rolling around has ruined one too many games for me with it.
The tank is fine for 7.7, its yet another victim of compression, no 6.3 in the game has the right to see this thing.
nah its got a good APDS , actively a good APDS on the t54E1 as well, the only ammo I used on the E1, good velocity, decent post pen, about the same as any other APDS and providing you aren’t just throiwng it mindlessly will one tap almost every tank even up to 8.7.
Shoulda specified, the conversation about the T54E2. I understand if someone’s skimming and they saw mine first and replied to it, but even then after I’ve explicitly stated that I was not the one originally talking about it gets annoying when the same person keeps trying to argue with you over it. It’s like if someone made a TL:DR on an essay and your first response was to debate them over the points in said essay rather than the person who wrote said essay.
Unless my side is tweaking out, your reply was the first in a month. Infact, the “Two Others” would be yourself
Except I wasn’t the last to post before you over the 1 month period, it was UniqueScorpions, before them Mr. Bombastic, AND THEN ME except I said:
Here, I circled it for you:
Once more, while this argument isn’t about the actual nature of your response, why did you reply to the person who was simply shortening someone elses reply so it could be added rather than the person who actually posted the original? It’s not like you skimmed through and only saw that comment of mine and not the ones later on. You could argue you used the slider, but even then you would’ve been able to see that it was from March and a reply, plus there would’ve been comments below it.
Well, the Fox doesn’t need to go up. It is already punished as it is, with unnecessary nerfs from people whose sources are literally, “I saw it in a dream”. Plus it already gets machine gunned to death anyways, the only reason people want it to go up is because it counters their indestructible heavy tanks at 7.7
Now I know you’re full of it. Tankier than a Maus? Have you tried not over penning it? Considering the fact most cannons at the BR are basically the size of the Fox, it’s not that hard to one tap it.
I mean if the fox was slower than the xm800, and far less stable, I would say 7.7 would be fine.
But given the fox is actually quite stable, faster than an xm800, and has more pen, plus for some unknown reason, more post pen damage than the Aubl 74 HVG (which is a 60mm cannon btw), and is this survivable, I don’t see why it’s lower than 8.0.
This was the first tank for me to ever get a nuke in, in a completely stock vehicle. I was amazed
