M26 should be 6.3 instead(should not face 7.7 stuff)
jumbo 76 6.0(rival tiger E)
Tiger II P 6.3(quite literally a worse armor Tiger II H frontally)
M247 down 8.7(if the PGZ09 can be 8.3 then this can go 8.7)
T26E5 should not be 7.0
T30 should not be 7.3
T29 shouldnt face 8.3 stuff
Just uptier Pgz, AAs in this BR range are stupidly strong anyway
Can you try to be amicable for once?
Yes I agree the atgm carrier post nerf are all bad, every single one. But I downtiered one and you copy pasted what you said, because you aren’t brining valid ideas to the table.
Beglit is far stronger than you let on.
Funny how the abrams needs a downtier, and you made that a stark point. WHY does an abrams need a downtier? They’re good tanks.
I agree. Did you know the M247 can kill a lot of mbts frontally through optics?
Can you try to be amicable for once?
I don’t see what you’re talking about.
Yes I agree the atgm carrier post nerf are all bad, every single one. But I downtiered one and you copy pasted what you said, because you aren’t brining valid ideas to the table.
Could you have thought I just misread?
Beglit is far stronger than you let on.
It’s not. Lacks tracking for anti air, AP rounds are mediocre against ground targets, I-TOW is ineffective at 10.0 as it is.
thats usually rng and require to be close range, side shot arent quite good either unless its NATO tanks except russian mbts
and all has to be close range
I was able to kill a KPZ-70 at 1300 meters…
bro YOU killed
i DIDNT KILL
YOUR KILL doesnt always mean its 100% going to be like that
The begel has very good angled armor that can bounce many different rounds and do funky things, same with the tam.
The begel has proxy, and a high damage 57MM with good pen.
It has a back up ATGMs and great mobility.
This is true, but a skilled shot with the SAP round and it’s HE filled to his optic over pressured the whole KPZ-70
those things arent very armored tho so
its more like a light mbts
I can do the same to a Leo 2, abrams, T-72, etc.
I think the chally is the only immune one from what I remember.
M1A1 11.3 → 11.7 OR Ariete 11.7 → 11.3
M1A1 is actually better than the Ariete, but ignoring that for the sake of argument, they should be the same BR
anything that has like more than 38mm side usually resist it
if M1A1 is 11.7 it needs more accurate armor
The M1A1 with the initial armor package (same as M1IP) is pretty much accurate AFAIK.
Sure M1A1 Click-Bait is 11.7 but that is also undertiered because it’s a premium and can’t be 12.0

The M1A1 with the initial armor package (same as M1IP) is pretty much accurate AFAIK.
I disagree
You telling me with an extra 2.2222222x times
more composite only add 50mm more ke
protection?
Your right ariete should go down. I mean tbf that’s the same with a lot of the upper tier Italian tanks.
The begel has very good angled armor
It’s a marder 3 hull, literally. Found at 7.7.
The begel has proxy,
I’m aware, yet it lacks auto tracking to utilize it on planes without heavy practice and for helis it requires you rangefind them which gives away what you’re doing or guess the range
and a high damage 57MM with good pen.
refer to
AP rounds are mediocre against ground targets
It has a back up ATGMs
refer to
I-TOW is ineffective at 10.0 as it is.
You don’t need to laze helis… smh, if you do, none have LWS at those brs. Maybe 10.3 and above may have them.
Look at the hulls my guy, you’ll be surprised.
The AP rounds work wonders…