The T-90 wasn’t even the T-90S or T-90MS derivative it was a bog standard T-90 with no dazzlers that has been power crept.
and the MiG 21 is fun but maybe 4 years ago when Britain needed it and was getting F.d in the ass by MiG 21 BIS in the FGR-2.
(EDIT didnt realise it was the MiG 21 Bison model that’s kind of cool)
Our top teir line up has no armor it would be nice to have some. Also we could get more mid BR AA which would be nice. there are a lot of gaps that A South Korean subtree could fix
Has no armour, cant take that comment seriously. M1A2 is an amazing tank with amazing mobility and a 5 second reload. You should play another nation and see what a poorly armoured tank looks like
Oh I didn’t know that every nation had a very easy to hit weak spot that the tiger 1 could pen. Also the ERA is not correctly model making the Seps armor package pretty useless. It is also missing the DU armor package. (don’t say that doesn’t exist because it does.) Don’t tell me to play another nation. I know italy and france have some bad armor but that doesn’t mean the US should be ignored. I also didn’t mention reload I was talking about armor.
No one is saying it shouldn’t get anything cool :)
From my point of view I want every nation to be competitive and not just the few favoured by Gaijin. The US still have so many good vehicles to be added
I agree with you. The reason I mostly ask for USA things and why they don’t have it is because I consider myself decently educated what tanks/jets/anything the USA has. I don’t like to spread misinformation. That is why I don’t talk about other nations as much.
Fun fact holding “W” is a strategy with the Abram’s IRL. it was made so we could go fast with its armor protecting from the front. Not saying that relates to gameplay but it is kinda funny imo
Fact remains you now have Canadian vehicles in a tree that doesnt need them. Could have had a Spanish 2A6 as a premium or a Swiss one you have the Swiss hunter but no you get the 2A4-CAN when you have one Canadian vehicle in your whole tech tree. And no historical links to Canada.
Its a german Leopard 2A4 upgraded by the germans with a german armor package for the canadians. Germany has way more of a link to it than Great Britain. Especially they already have the Chally 2 OES
So why did Germany get the Swiss Hunter? Lets see your double standards get you out of this one.
I dont disagree the point remains Britain has tech tree and premium Canadian vehicles.
The CR2 OES is a copy and paste mess, that needs massive work (as its unplayable at those BRs) The fact Gaijin took the CR2 TES THE WORST CR2 in game and copied it stuck a 50. cal on it and sold it as a premium is shameful enough.
This would have been a perfect time for Gaijin to remove it and replace it with the 2A4-CAN. Now there is no way ever for Britain to have a competitive premium tank.
I said earlier Germany could have taken a 2A6 from Switzerland which would have tied in with Hunter they stole, and opened the pathway for the Swiss FA-18
They got the swiss Hunter because Gaijin wanted to fill a CAS hole ( which they should have filled with the Alphajet instead). Pretty much everyone agrees that the swiss Hunter should have gone to britain
Yet its in the German tree, still in the German tree.
It’s ok for Britain to have every other Canadian/Australian tank aircraft ingame until something cool that Gaijin can sell comes along and it gets farmed out to the big 3.
C2A1, M1 AIM and now the 2A4M-CAN you wonder why British players are fed up.
I am willing to accept the Finlander in the Swedish, I am also willing to accept the Hungarian in the Italian. and I am willing to accept the Thai in the Japanese
but that is it.
France does not need BeNeLux and BeNeLux does not need to be a sub-tree, it has way enough material and unique material to be a tech tree on its own.
Switzerland also has a large number of vehicles on its own. for both aircraft and ground forces. on the ground alone, I identified 110 vehicles of which 95 are unique to them. and Austria are a natural subtree for Switzerland to fill the gap and fit their history.
Germany has way more vehicles than is needed already. adding Switzerland and Austria would not enhance the tree, it would saturate it. Switzerland has enough material to fill 4 lines well crowded. Austria can make 2 lines. how many research lines does Germany need to be competitive? 10? at this point, I would just say to delete the national system and let people play whatever they want.
besides, from 1918 to the present, Switzerland has been working closely with the French to develop its armament. the only exception was the Mowag Tornado and Pirat and the Panzer 87. The Panzer 58, 61, and 68 used French tech and incorporated many parts from the AMX 30.
adding Austria and Switzerland to Germany sound more like an idea from greedy bias boys than a rational one to me