Stop buying the F-2A ADTW to grind the Japanese TT. The FREE F-5E FCU is an amazing fighter that will teach you dogfighting and great python missiles. Plus its alot cheaper, just slap a tailsman on that thing.
I wasn’t an amazing pilot when I used it but still got great games:
max vehicle research efficiency: VI - VIII
so unless you have VI era already unlocked, it will be a nightmare to grind the tech tree from nothing
The new new EF and flanker being 14.3 proves we are screwed in the decompression dept.
Look.at the jets i listed for improvenents.
Even with the changes… they are still not on the level of other jets at same BR.
13.0 every jet for eg should be ranked vs the best which is the 13.0 flanker.
Sparrows not working unless paywalled P isnt decompression its just straight up taking the piss out of us all
True, but its still alot more fun and teaches more. If its a veteran player just grinding a new TT obviously f-2a ADTW is a deadly choice. But for newbies it’s not that good, especially if they thought hard lock wasn’t needed for sparrows.
And they fire them perfectly at a target 4 km away head on… sparrow goes 90degrees off target, fully fox 3 to kill a friendly 15 km away
1 Like
Nothing is blocking Gaijin to redo the whole BR Table over to a 15.7/16.0 - from a blank page.
still no,… you’re trying to get better results from weaponnary/stuff changes.
Gaijin proved us already that this is not the way to do things,…
when they’ve added AIM-120A to F-16 ADF/OCU/MLU’s, there was a spike of results for those aircrafts,… yet they’re now still in the same conditions as they were previously.
the problem comes from how the players do play the game,… most vehicules aren’t played if they’re not “MeTa - bEsT aIrCrAfT”,… similarly to zombies,…
the changes you’re requiring doesn’t improve gameplay behaviors done by players, it only hides them.
a true change should be to get rid of stupid BR placements for X or Y weapon/stuff.
still no,… your proposed method isn’t going to be any good either.
i see you spamming this,… but still have no clue on what you’re refering too.
i played AIM-7F/AIM-7M through quite a lot from various aircrafts, and they didn’t let me down, unless i shot those in a bad configuration,…
1- firing a missile =/= guaranteed kill
2- firing a missile with a good knowledge of launch conditions and target =/= guaranteed kill
but the difference is the effiency of both launch, in which “2” is better than “1”.
because those AIM-7P acts quite closely to an AIM-120A (you only need to remain locked on target)
R-27ER does hold similar features for Years
the fact that they’re being paywalled as such a low BR, is to ensure more and more “Pay to Win”
F-16A ADF/MLU/OCU doesn’t get 7P’s yet the AIM-120’s send them straight to 13.3 BR, with AIM-9L as secondary (no AIM-9M, proving that AIM-120 alone is enough to be BR 13.3)
and i won’t comment on the last part, apart to say that you’re so pissed that you can’t even think correctly to a solution and that’s all proofs that you’re trying to get “band-aids” solutions.
Sparrows are a random evemt. You are the only person iv ever hear that thinks they are ok.
Better missiles are at 11.7 than 13.0.
Sparrow P like you say act the same/ as good as missiles at 11.7.
F16s were actually saved going fox 3 so dont see the issue? Would of been nice to be foldered but we can stiil see the mediocrisy of the F16AJ to this day.
All the very mid vics i list even with upgrades still doesnt put them anywhere near the 13.0 flanker
So your whole logic is we cant make bad vics better because compression?
Even though most said bad vics are only being given whats already available at 12.7?
they’re as random as you shoot them,…
if you stick to a working method, they’re no problems really.
BECAUSE THEY SHOULD NEVER BE THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!
Can’t you F understand?! Dammit,…
F/A-18C early should never be in the same spot as F-16A ADF Pre-AIM-120A, or the current F-16AJ.
F/A-18A being at 12.3 same BR as F-4EJ Kai is ridiculous.
F/A-18A is better at everything, including the Radar (which is the best thing abord the F-4EJ Kai)
and F/A-18A doesn’t have AIM-7P’s,… but get 2 more missiles missiles than F-16AJ (in the configuration of 2x AIM-7M+6AIM-9L) - the F-16AJ is still 12.7.
so,… please just understand that last year of introductions were “OFF”, and that it should get changed.
Su-27 at 13.0 doesn’t have Fox-3, same with Su-33 at BR 13.0 — Only R-27ER/R-27ET in a large numbers.
Yet they are are at BRs they will keep for the forseeable future…so making them a little more even vs what it faces in game at present is all we can ask.
Decompeession isnt happening in the way you want, ever.
You want premium f18s at 13.0 with current loadout is just lol.
Personally i want more viable jets to use without making them any better than what is avaikable in game today… not hopes and delusions that the snail will ever actually balance the BRs
F/A-18’s only problem is their players,…
i can’t understand HOW the F/A-18A, BR12.3 - non premium aircraft, with result stats:
Average Kill/Death Ratio : 1.19
Average Kill/Spawn Ratio : 0.94
Average WinRatio : 50.1%
and F/A-18C Early, BR12.7 - premium aircraft, with result stats:
Average Kill/Death Ratio : 0.77
Average Kill/Spawn Ratio : 0.64
Average WinRatio : 47.1%
how can they both loose to the F-4EJ Kai, BR12.3 - non premium aircraft, which is basically a F-4C (as in F-4EJ never recieved “Agile Eagle” modifications) with Flares/chaff and Pulse-Doppler radar of F-16A, with AIM-9L&7F, with result stats:
Average Kill/Death Ratio : 1.25
Average Kill/Spawn Ratio : 0.95
Average WinRatio : 52.5%
Both F/A-18’s have access to better missiles (AIM-7F<AIM-7M<AIM-7P) and also have the upper hand in every flight performances of aircraft (F-4C vs F/A-18 lol) and avionics (radar of F/A-18A > F-16A)
Please tell me how? how can the F-4C Kai is better than F/A-18’s???
Gaijin did everything they could to get US players to have good results in the game, and it doesn’t work!!!
how can’t you understand that US Mains are mostly so bad, that any mere changes of missiles (like giving AIM-9M) would merely hide the lack of skill up to next BR range?
or maybe we should put everything down (like they love to do with MiG-21F-13, from 9.7 to 9.3 when i did 2.0KD when it was 9.7)
Source of results for each aircrafts: StatShark - See All Player, Missile, and Vehicle Statistics
in an “all the time” configuration.
12.7 is up there with the worst in the game. I play 13.7 alot and its 80% 12.7- 13.7. Honestly think thats why. 12.3 is just better MM
Check premium mig 29 vs non premium mig29 IIRC it was only around 10% worse. I was surprised myself…
i have just compared both 12.3 F-4EJ Kai and F/A-18A, alongside the F/A-18C at 12.7.
now,…since you need that i take you by the hands,…
i’ll precise my question :
HOW CAN THE F-4EJ KAI BE BETTER THAN F/A-18A?
One of the only phantoms iv not used so cant say.
Whats your theory?
i gave up my theory before:
it seems like you don’t read me,…
As all f18s are doing worse, then just maybe its the f18?
Slow, 1 turn airbrake FM probs not best if you are a hold S player.
Same was done with Delta’s like: Mirage III or 5 or 2000 / F-106 / Rafale / EF-2000 / J35’s
they don’t drop in performance so much that they can’t handle a F-4C-KAI
Even the F-16A isn’t that bad either in that matter once under a certain speed. (thanks to that, i killed 3xMiG-23ML’s in a 1vs3)
the problem come from how good the player is adapting to it’s aircraft: strengths and weakness
that’s still a player problem, and not a FlightModel one, as the former is accurate.
if it was that bad, you wouldn’t be able to keep an average 1.5 KD with that aircraft, similarly to all other aircrafts you’ve played (based on your 15 most played aircrafts - 1.33KD)
When did they add the J-35 for China? Thats like fairly new isn’t wth did i miss?
J35 Draken,… about flight model answering :
You mean J35? They don’t use a dash.
Only draken that has a dash is the F-35 WDNS
dash? you mean the in-game functionnality? it’s not necessary for some aircraft
(for many of listed ones, i meant before Gaijin nerfed all Delta’s AoA in order to “give players a better experience” - still possible by using full real control.)