Current state of the applique armor on the dev server
It still doesn’t have any benefit to KE：(
No worries just keep that same energy when it comes to air. Germany doesn’t need a U.S. built for Argentine f16.
2 Likes
Absolutely cooked him! I’m over the 2A4M, Gaijin have given us the Desert Warrior and a new Tornado. No complaints from a British main here.
I wholeheartedly agree. I don’t mind Germany not having a great top tier aircraft to compede, I’ll just play at a bit lower BR or play another nation until the game is finally ready for the Typhoon. I don’t think they need a Swiss F/A-18 either.
he cooked me? I absolutely agree with his statement
Yeah but they basically did that with italy air so kind of a moot point right?
Hey I got no problem with that, as long as the logic is congruent I’m with ya.
Italy air is a problem too, though there simply aren’t that many modern jets and they don’t have their own for that era. and I don’t think the solution is watering down every tree everywhere.
If Britain didn’t have their own tank in the Challenger 2s and they actually used Leopards irl, I wouldn’t object. Sweden for example is fine.
Which was already stupid. Swiss Hunter for Germany was stupid too. Don’t need to pile on more problems and mistakes.
Imo Squadron vehicles were pretty much always a problem after the M1A1 AIM. Swedish T-80, British T-90, German Hunter, Japanese F-5E, none of those are a good pick for their trees imo.
India for Britain is fine but then give them the British vehicles and the native Indian vehicles, and don’t just dump Russian stuff into the British tree…
Sweden air is basically the worst gripen of the bunch and the most mid air. It doesnt have any intrigue to pull players unlike italy. Its one of the reasons i recommend new players to grind italy air cause its pretty fun and has a lot of additions from every tree in it. Plus theyll still be getting more vehicles which makes theirbair even more diverse.
Sweden’s Gripens are on par with everyone else. They’re not worse. They literally got rid of any differences the A and C had when people got mad that Sweden got the worst one. And now that the C gets Fox-3, Sweden gets it too.
Italy Air has some variety at top tier but honestly kinda sucks everywhere else. But if you only care about 12.0+, sure. And to be fair, if you want a more fun F-16 or MiG-29, you’re better off with USA/Israel or Germany, respectively. Italy only has the barebones models for those.
Thats a weird take on italy. They have some of my favorite props in the game not to mention they are pretty unique, the C202 series is very good. Imo better than the bf109’s but its the early jet age that is kinda rough. Once you get past it its a bit better since you get access to the hungarian tree, that is if you dont care to play the f84 and such. Hungary really fixed a lot of the problems and im looking foward to them adding some domestic prop designs.
1 Like
Additional components can be fitted inside the wedge?
Currently we are only getting hollow ones :(
I’ve heard additional armor can be but my source is other WT forum posts… so… maybe?
So I just did some googling and apparently all Leopard 2 turret wedged armor is spaced armor, so I’m guessing the Canadian one is the same.
2a5 arrowhead and the 2a4m can turret armor is completly different
Lots of cookie cutter tank websites say the wedge armor on the 2A4M CAN is spaced as well, but they don’t seem the most reliable.
Would love to see something stating otherwise, I don’t want this thing to be a glass cannon.
“This is true to some extent, as the additional composite armor modules on the Canadian Leopard are an almost exact copy of the types of armor found on the 2A7 series tanks.”
???
1 Like