Gajin said bullshit there
But this is a sales pitch a tank from the game and not from the real world
Agreed, to me tech trees represent what tanks are operated by a nation or its close regional relatives. I don’t care where it’s being built. Otherwise why have a Chinese tech tree at all when most of it in the early BRs are RU and US tanks ? Why have a Finnish 2A4 in the Sweden tree if it’s German ? Why put the Benelux F-16 in the France tree if it’s American ? These are opportunities for tech trees to have more technological diversity and it’s great and it represents the vehicles these nations or regions operate.
It’s also such a wasted opportunity for UK top tier (under the commonwealth reasoning). It could have gone to the USA but I think they’ve already suffered enough from the Click Bait players ;)
Canada is either USA because NA or Commonwealth. Germany has way enough vehicles as it is too.
Womp womp
Even if what they originally said isn’t correct, it is quite literally a scam to first say that you will receive something and then after a while when people have bought it change what they’ll receive to be different.
Whether it has the armor of a 2A7 or a slightly upgraded 2A4 makes a huge difference. One of the main features of the later leopards (2A5 and later) is the fact that they have such great protection on the turret cheeks, so if it suddenly only has a small increase in protection that completely changes how one can use the vehicle.
now that you mention it, they removed the part of the 2a7 armor lol.
Well in the end thats the reason you wait with the preorders as long as you can
Or you do extensive research what the vehicle can before deciding on anything
In the end of the day. They are pre orders because they arent in a finished state and a lot on them can change
That is exactly why i haven’t preordered it, but it is basically the definition of an Advance-fee scam which is very illegal.
They actually did lmao. The “against all types of ammunition” as well xD
yeah i was like huhhh intresting
Will the Leopard 2A4M use the DM53 APFSDS?
try and dig before asking
No, It will use KE-W, Same shell as on the M1A1 AIM and the M60 AMBT
The camo nets are all strange to me, they’re too static, this game needs more moving pieces on ground vehicles.
Its not a net, Barracuda MCS is a padding.
All premium camo nets are static, I’m sure they can make it have physics but it would be too CPU intensive, oddly enough the KV-85 has a bucket hanging on the back with actual physics, I’m sure they can program something similar for nets.
I personally prefer that tech trees don’t get watered down too much with other tech tree’s shiny toys if they have their own toys already or could get their own toys. Yes, that includes me not liking things like F-16s in the french tech tree, they already have their Mirages.
For example Sweden having Leopards is okay because that is their only modern MBT. Finnish 2A4 doesn’t change the situation much because they already had the Strv121, so they really only got a researchable backup. Similarly, Italy getting an F-16 back when they had nothing for top tier was fine too.
The UK already has their own modern MBT (and also already has SEVEN of them including the premium, the most of any nation), they really don’t need to steal other tech tree’s tanks too. On the other hand, they didn’t really have much for air, so I didn’t mind them getting the Gripen.
Besides, the UK already has an 11.3 premium, ofc they’re giving other trees some before giving the UK a second one. And they already have, I repeat, SEVEN 11.3-11.7 MBTs. They don’t need any more right now.
“This is true to some extent, as the additional composite armor modules on the Canadian Leopard are an almost exact copy of the types of armor found on the 2A7 series tanks.”
This is a scam
That part actualy was edited iut
But after my purchase
???
Ask for a refund, and here you’ll need this: