You’re giving me documents from 1989. Even though the first launch was only in the 1990s. Srly?
Than they should know that a lot the technology those documents talk about was implemented why lie about it
Hey, Im pretty sure it has to be documented before it can be tested…
2 Likes
while im here actually, just a reminder to those sharing documents
4 Likes
Even though Phoenix isn’t in use anymore and neither is Tomcat.
Nobody does that. First they test, and then they write about platform compatibility. Why document a missile that could explode under its wing and, after testing, be either not used or recalled?
Dude has no clue how many r’s are in the word strawberry or whether or not to put glue on pizza.
I wouldn’t trust AI for any vital information, especially in regards to the F-14D.
3 Likes
And yet some documents about them are still classified, restricted or export restricted.
Sadly gaijin is asking for documents that are classified
Everything else will just be closed has “not enough information”
Yall gave us no digital weapons to even use on the F14D that main upgrade was being DIGITAL to be be able to use more modern weapons like aim7p, aim54c+, and AMRAAMs witch in the f14D manual
The only digital upgrades weapons we get is jdams
5 Likes
They are not, they are asking for documents that are legal to distribute that can suppport your statements, this is why secondary sources are also allowed.
1 Like
Except they aren’t.
2 Likes
This is all fake. There is not a single piece of evidence. Even in classified documents
That doesn’t mean anything…
Just because the first flight was a year after the document was published doesn’t mean it invalidated the designation.
You have to realize that the AIM-54C+ with ECCM and internal cooling system was something that was in plans and development for a long time, so they included this in the primary document.
Please stop.
Btw, you cited a rudimentary fact sheet (timeline) from a .mil website…
4 Likes
Doesn’t mean technology doesn’t stay classified. Classification is used to protect certain technologies because not every nation has developed said technologies themselves, even if others have developed more advanced stuff anyways.
Shoot, some countries have insane declassification laws, like Japan’s if I recall is 100 years after decommissioning, but that’s getting off topic.
2 Likes
Unless it’s ‘a friend of my cousin said his other friends Estranged half-sisters cousin third-removed said this about Russian tech’
2 Likes
You clearly lie or don’t know what you even talking about the documents I’ve provided literally says it was
1 Like
Tbh, how ‘classified’ can a document truly be if it’s been on the internet for months if not years and the ‘bottomless pit of funding’ U.S military doesn’t give a rats about it
1 Like
.mil is not US website?
No, this means the version with better radar was popularly called the 54C+. And then, when the version with improved cooling came out, it adopted the popular name. But these are two different versions.
If they want the exact armor values of the Abrams to buff the armor of the sep3 Abrams they are asking for classified information
They don’t have to say it directly