Tell me why It cant have the ECCM/Sealed. I have shown you strong documentation, I agree its not the same as the 54C+. So…
1 Like
But then it would disrupt the balance. This shouldn’t be in the game.
That’s a balance argument, not a historical one. I’m fine separating the two. Historically, the F-14D is documented with AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed via LAU-132. Whether Gaijin should add it for balance is a separate question. But saying “it didn’t have it” and saying “it shouldn’t have it for balance” are not the same argument.
The Su-30mk2 can carry the R-77-1. Why not?
Because computer programs can’t POSSIBLY be biased or wrong
2 Likes
That’s fine. If Su-30MK2 is documented with R-77-1, then argue for that too. That doesn’t weaken the F-14D point. “Other aircraft may also be missing documented weapons” is not an argument against the F-14D having documented AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed capability.
3 Likes
I’ve seen apples with better critical thinking…
3 Likes
Well then it will be moved to 13.3. Which will make it unplayable.
You do realize chat gpt literally used this chat has a source
I could probably say the f14d used aim120D(with all its functions) often enough and chatgpt would state it has a fact
5 Likes
Stop this nonsense
Sonion, are we fr
12 Likes
The document is dated 1989. And the first test launch was only in 1990. There’s a misperception there. The AI explained everything to me. You’re very wrong.
Maybe its a BR compression problem? I feel like it would only be unplayable in uptiers, I mean if the AIM54 family was modeled accurately it would have a huge range advantage I feel like.
1 Like
Okay, I get it. You don’t understand the differences between the versions. That’s why we’re arguing about different things.
Explains alot
5 Likes
I understand they are not all the exact same version.
My understanding is:
AIM-54C is the baseline C model.
AIM-54C ECCM/Sealed is an improved C variant/configuration with better ECCM and sealed/dry capability.
AIM-54C with ECP-82 is a further engineering change to the C/ECCM-Sealed line, and the document says this is sometimes referred to as AIM-54C+.
1 Like
What that fast? They checked all those links out that fast? And they lie that the f14 wasn’t implemented with the tech those link describes which they were?
6 Likes
true.
Bait used to be believable
6 Likes
might already have seen the links on other reports