you must be ragebaiting
4 Likes
Done, I clicked the main one 👍 Thank you for work on suggestions 🍻
1 Like
Wouldn’t put it past someone who says the 141 firing 73s is more believable than the missile developed and tested for an aircraft not being compatible for the aircraft.
2 Likes
Facts
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
ask about the yak now
This is off-topic.
No way you just said the statement it asked chatgpt and believe that is a reliable answer.
9 Likes
That’s why I’m asking for evidence that clearly states the missile was used, not indirect evidence.
Theres not a direct operational document because it hasnt been declassified yet. But you cant sit here and say that the devs require that to add a missile? Because then you have to be able to find that for every missile in the game, its inconsistent logic you are using
1 Like
You literally got a NAVAIR site.
Can you send a link and highlight the text where this is written?
You asking ChatGPT about this 100% proves what everyone has been saying about you, you realize that?
3 Likes
I gave these resources to AI for research and he responded that they do not contain information on using F14D AIM54C+
@IzumoKai54 already did for you above then you brushed it off. I not doing your stupid arguing in circles song and dance.
1 Like
You cannot live without your 100% correct chatgpt, i got you
1 Like
I’m not trying to squeeze anything out of the developers. Why should I have to prove anything? That’s your business.
I could not find anything with specific launch parameters, but this source explains the operations.
That’s not at all the question. You’re using ChatGPT to give a point you could’ve made yourself, and you’re even screenshotting it as an argument instead of saying it yourself, as if ChatGPT had any more authority than you or me. That discredits everything
1 Like