No, it wasn’t.
4 Likes
AMX M4 was fast enough to take advantage of mobility especially against other 6.7s and even more so against 5.7s, with a super powerful gun, manageable reload, good gun handling, and enough armor to be very confident against most opponents
It is fine with the uptier, and AMX-13 WOULD be if it got its APDS
AuF1 at 6.7 with better traverse would make it as annoying as something like an M109, whilst its clearing missing far better ammo and mobility
They’re not at all bad vehicles right now, and ‘nuh uh’ isn’t a good reason
Mobility =/= overpowered
No. Just high pen solid shot.
I get not much longer reload with the far better kwk43 gun.
It is decent, not overperforming.
No? Lmao.
11 Likes
Ever get a downtier in that thing? You can soak shots to the front especially in tighter maps, and anything that can penetrate you, you are faster than, can slice right through, out-reload, and often just take more than one shot because why not
AMX-M4’s uptier was fine, that should be obvious to anyone
Yes? I’ve also died to 4.0 tanks frontally in it because it doesn’t have any of this armor you speak of. All the AMX M4 was at 6.7 was a decent all rounder, it didn’t approach anywhere near overpowered.
Nope. It wasn’t.
4 Likes
“Nuh uh”
If you think going to 7.0 was AMX M4 ruining there is nothing else to say. Absolutely no reason it and Pershing should be the same BR
As opposed to your yuh uh… I’m sure you think you’re providing massive reasoning though (you’re not.)
5 Likes
I give reasons and some comparison, that thing being the same BR as the Tigers and Pershings it has a quite significant advantage against was pretty silly
Poor reasons. I also gave reasoning…
??? Implying the AMX m4 is a better vehicle than the Tiger 2 in 6.7 matchmaking? Seriously? You are delusional. Won’t continue this further as it’s clear you are speaking outside of your element/expertise.
2 Likes
Even BPA_Jon said it was overpowered at 6.7. It deserved 7.0.
Incorrect.
3 Likes
How is it not? You get a gun that can punch through armor with better reload, handling, mobility, less projectile trajectory, you just punch them in the face and move on
1 Like
20 HP/Ton, fantastic reverse gear, Panther F equivalent armor, 6.7s reload, 5 crew, amazing solid shot round, great turret traverse. What else do you even want in a tank?
This is enough for me to not respect what you’re saying alone.
This is also hilarious though.
1 Like
In an uptier i’ll rather play the AMX M4. And the Tiger II H should be 7.0, 2 things can be true at the same time.
Same side armor, if you angle in either you’re dead. Similar UFP and a mistake I made about the turret’s thickness. Regardless, you don’t rely on armor in the thing.
Terrible day to have eyes. Maybe in a DECOMPRESSED game.
3 Likes
Let me help you out bud.
See that giant literal m22 sized bit of green?
FOURTY MILLIMETERS
FOUR-TY
40
That’s 10x4
or 20x2
2 Likes
And quite literally anyone with sense thinks this. Maybe you’re the problem here.
Its almost like you avoid getting hit in the thing. Like a Sherman, the armor will rarely save you, don’t rely on it. And, that plate is deceptive in game. Volumetric and the turret ring love to troll.
Or maybe you’re delusional. I’m going with that one!
5 Likes
You’re the only deluded one here. Ask anybody even somewhat good at the game.