Poll: Should War Thunder Add More Tech-Tree Vehicles to Japan, Sweden, Italy, and Israel?

Not because, the subtrees that gaijn adds are most often copies of the usa or ussr, and they don’t contribute anything except that now everyone has an m4 sherman or t55, if I think that Japan should get a country, others shouldn’t, gaijn should finally start adding state communities, as it is in wot, e.g. Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Yugoslavia, as one common tree, 90% of these nations could be used to create a large and interesting tree, and not add to France And other countries because Germany or France have a lot of their own vehicles or prototypes and the gaijin ignores them, only to give one of them in an event or in a paid battle pass in a few years

1 Like

Sweden should get Denmark/Norway, as they are already somewhat in the tree and would hep flesh it out with unique vehicles (The Norwegians have a nice 90mm Chaffee with a LRF, the Danes have some nice flare-equipped Drakens)

The norwegians have a TON of unique vehicles. Especially for the lower tiers where Sweden suffers the most.

I wouldn’t bother arguing with him, he believed the RB24/AIM 9B exports are better despite them being the same. Any and all swedish vehicles are op in his mind for air.

2 Likes

Japan and sweden definitely lack air the most though so much of the playerbase hears sweden and scream bias and that they are op at every br as they foam at the mouth. Sweden lacks a lot at every BR for air, japan gets rough around the jet age and up since they have so few options. Though planes are good but some are over BRed

Didn’t Hungary buy an IS-2 at one point?

Yes, and they captured an IS-1.

The Kungstiger was added because gaijin decided to replace the KV-1B since that will never be added to Finland. Its not what anyone wanted. German players even scream sweden players want to take everything from germany but if we could we would’ve taken the actual finnish tank since idk, its not german and germany captured KV-1B’s and even modified them. Dont think it was the players who wanted the Kungstiger, that was gaijins way of making up for completely gate keeping the only decent finnish heavy tank considering the KV-1A is weaker than the KV-1C in armor and gun at the same BR lmao.

2 Likes

The + 12 is the alleged copy-paste air, and the + 7 is the alleged copy-paste ground.
The 8 ground units are all guaranteeed unique vehicles added during the Hungarian ground update.

No vehicles replace other vehicles for development; every neat vehicle will be added.
Also Republic of China is already in the game @Rowiek , was released with China.

Clearly too many unique vehicles for a sub tree.

@Pheonix_RX01
Kungstiger wouldn’t have been added to Germany in any situation, which is a unique Tiger 2.

Yet the reason it was added was to replace the KV-1B which was confirmed to be added exclusively to germany. So again it wasn’t a solution. Additionally it has the new damage model making it weaker than the germany model so yes its technically unique but it ignores making finland a good subtree and shows a continuous lack of interest in making fi land have anything of value in the TT

Also care to add to your prior argument that the KV-1A would be 4.3? Its worse than the C in armor 80mm front turret and 70mm hull not 75mm. Its still 5 0

1 Like

And no, nothing was added to replace the KV-1B.
That’s not how game development works.

I said 4.7 BTW, clearly Gaijin’s balance team didn’t actually think much about KV-1A.

Literally change that to finland and you have the finnish subtree in a nutshell

1 Like

And it aint even like the finns lack vehicles that could be added- They have the sturmi, the T-50 with add-on armor, the T-34 with the Kwk 40 L/48… plus semi-unique ones like their T-34 w/muzzle brake and Pz. IV with russian MGs.

Why lie?

The Finnish sub-tree which is half unique vehicles.

Not sure why your post is claiming you’re lying.

lol
lmao even
Lemme go down the line-
Vickers Mk. E (Unique)
T-28 (Not even the finnish one that ripped out the MG balls, so its a copypaste)
T-34 (Direct copypaste)
Panzer IV (Direct Copypaste)
PT-76B (Direct Copypaste)
Comet I (Direct Copypaste)
T-34-85 (Direct Copypaste)
Charioteer (Direct Copypaste)
T-54 (Direct Copypaste)
T-55M (Unique)
T-72M1 (Unique due to a few differences)
Leo 2A4 (Direct Copypaste)
Leo 2A6 (Direct Copypaste)

2 Likes

Your list is missing the unique vehicles BT-42, CT-CV 105HP, KV-1 m1942 [which is fair someone might miss it as it was added this update, T-26E, ItPsV Leopard 2 Marksman, ITO-90M [which France has a copy-paste of]. 6 unique ground vehicles.
And of course you’re missing the copy paste that is ZSU-57-2.

2A6 has an entirely new turret.
2A4 has a new turret model whether you acknowledge that or not.

11 unique, 9 copy-paste. 10-10 if you want to dismiss 2A4.
You’re also missing aircraft.

'Im a big fan of it as I have said so don’t try to twist things.You are the one is in favour of flooding the Tech tree with copy paste not me.

The last copy-paste added to Sweden was the JAS-39C.
Before that was the Finnish ground tree adding a few good copy-paste tanks that Finland notably used.
They don’t get much copy-paste, it’s mostly unique vehicles.

In their air tree J34, Pyorremyrsky, Vampire [de Havilland Goblin 3 engine], J35XS, Morko Morane, B-239, Fokker DXXI x2, Ar 196 A-5, and anything else I’m missing are all unique additions to Finland.
J34 uses different engine and wings to the Hunter F6.

This fine and a good point but many did ask for it ,you can find such posts requesting it on here.I understand Swedes not wanting though as we have similar in the UK tree with more modern SA vehicles where we do at least have British vehicles we could have used.
.
Many also wanted some kind of heavy tank just to do the Battle Pass.