advanced 29 variants from the 90s got 120 cms but the one from the 2000s onwards are stuck with 32 not including smt
I’ve played them with 27ER and honestly it was their saving grace. Having R-73s as your best weaponry on such a plane at 13.0 would be it’s funeral.
wrong, the charts dont align anywhere.
also wrong, shortly after release the oswald number was nerfed to unrealistic lows, wich makes the lift-drag ratio worse.
also wrong for several reasons. The 29 doesnt meet the target Gs listed in the handbook, it operates in the LPM instead of the NPM engine mode and its oswald number is too low.
this isnt a source im aware of, im assuming you mean the Практическая+аэродин… instead
the speed range youve specified is wrong, the thrust underperforms below 1000km/h and actually overperforms above 1400km/h
Was that the same patch that added the Mig-29G? I know that one nerfed EVERY plane in energy retention. Everything lost a bit of turn rate across the board.
There was also the takeoff flaps “nerf” that fixed the ability to use takeoff flaps at high rate speeds with the Mig-29. The mig29 enjoyed a big advantage by using takeoff flaps at speeds up to 550kph IAS before.
patch that added the smt and the f-16c, so a bit before that, yeah mig 29 somehow used to gain rate when using flaps lol. FM WAS overperforming before
From my tests there were 2 patches that did the sustained rate nerf across the board. The last one was the one where Mig-29G was added, the other might be that one, but I can’t recall.
I’m not entirely sure what’s going on with the flight model of the MiG-29. Could someone explain a little bit about it, because I always hear everyone saying that it’s wrong, but if that were the case and it were common knowledge, Gaijin would have done something about it by now or atleast talk about it
basically people say that it loses too much speed when pulling hard, missing thrust, etc etc. its sustained is fairly accurate, even overperforming in some areas and underperforming at other areas
I don’t know if it is realistic or not since I’m not an IRL mig-29 pilot. But most people underestimate the current Mig-29 FM, especially the 9.12
In most places, rd33 claims more power than the ingame values, but again, if its common knowledge how gaijin hasnt pronounced about it
People dont underestimate it, it’s just bad plain and simple
IDK, Merf claims that I’m wrong about the engine thrust being wrong, so I doubt he’ll change his stance to agree with me and others.
@Merf_HD
You do realize I’m saying engine thrust is incorrect… right?
I quite literally agree with you that the thrust curve is incorrect.
And you’re claiming that claim is wrong… while agreeing with me about the engine thrust being incorrect.
My statement that Mig-29’s thrust curve is incorrect is still my statement that I make today.
It will not change.
because you are wrong, proven so
at this point you arent even trying to make sense
go somewhere else to ragebait
so what about the thrust chart
that clearly shows that your statments were incorect
just stop it you are not convincing anyone
Zero people have disproved the claim that engine thrust is incorrect.
you are changing you statment to not look bad
afaik you cant have a 4x r73 loadout on mig21 bison
further proving my point that it’s incorrect!
stop trying to gaslight ppl the thrust curve is incorrect at every speed
Please explain to us how saying “Thrust is incorrect at lower speeds.” is a different statement to “Thrust is incorrect at lower speeds.” if you want to double down on that claim…
thats not what you said go gaslight somewhere else dont do it here
nope
i meant to say *cant