There are LOTS of very good TT russian jets after props, more than there are in the chinese TT
1 Like
@ron_23 I’ll wait for you to disprove Mikoyan’s own documents then, since you’re claiming they are wrong.
then show me the documents that show that it is performing corretly i will wait
show me your document that is a better sources than the Mig-29 aerodynamics study
you have already proven to me before that you are not competent enough to talk about aerodynamics
2 Likes
J7E> all migs
Mirage> all ruski jets
J10> all ruski jets
J11> ruski flankers
China has mig19, mig21 9.7 with more ammo, the J7D is also better than migs IMO.
You miss nothing if you have china. I should of done france tree
Which leaves the mig23… which i dont like either lol.
@ron_23
Why would I attempt to disprove my own claim that the engines are incorrect?
The Mig-29 Aerodynamics study and Mikoyan documents are accurate.
The fact you claim they’re wrong just because I say they’re right is hilarious.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
That’s an extreme oversimplification.
By BR order, the following are all quite good TT soviet jets:
Yak15, yak17, La-200, Mig-15, Mig-15bis, yak-23, yak-30D, Mig-19PT, Mig-21smt, Mig-21bis, Mig-23M, Mig-23mld, Mig-29A, yak141, Su-27, Su-30SM
I don’t regret it, it’s a fast TT to grind and has some unique vehicles or variants.
burden of proof is on you
1 Like
he has no proof for his outlandish statments thats why he deflected and twisted my words
1 Like
Mikoyans documents say that you are wrong
thrust roughly lines up at around mach 0.9 but at any other speed it is incorrect
which was shown to you yesterday by @Merf_HD
so the thrust curve is wrong at pretty much every speed
4 Likes
@f15j_anmeagle @ron_23
Not sure why you two are claiming there’s no proof of Mig-29 being incorrect.
It’s common knowledge that the anti-FOD device is incorrectly tuned in-game.
As you can see it’s producing significantly less thrust than it should at sea level at lower speeds, proving my statements entirely accurate that the thrust curve is wrong.
Edit:
Ron you even agreed in your most recent post about this… so why are we arguing?
1 Like
you just proved that you lied
and iam asking for proof for the flight model and not thrust as you are claiming the flight model is correct
and iam asking for proof stop deflecting and twisting my words
@ron_23
Until the thrust curve is fixed, the drag fixes a while back are to be understood as accurate.
Cause incorrect thrust can make it seem like that drag is too high because the thrust to drag ratio itself is wrong due to thrust being too low. Drag could very well be incorrect [active claim that has burden of proof] but that’s an unprovable claim until thrust is fixed.
then dont say the flight model is correct because it very much isnt
you just have proven yourself wrong
becasue even with its current thrust it is not behaving like it should
end of disscussion
you didnt prove any of your points, only thing you did is contradicting yourself
if you are that desperate for attention seek it somewhere else
3 Likes
flight model has definitely been nerfed, whenever gaijin updated the game to the patch the 16c came out they changed the 29 and f16 fm a lot
1 Like
This poll should honestly be renamed to “do you want to sign off a death warrant for this vehicle ?”
it is already dead no one is really playing the base mig-29
becasue you have to play your frontline fighter as a missile bus, that dosent get missiles
with a nerfed FM that gaijin butchered after giving it a missile it shouldnt have
2 Likes
i dont think so i am ever grinding post mig23 planes in that line atp, its just mid
i would still grind it for the prospect of the Mig-35
but i would recomment doing that after getting the Flankers
thats why i want to make it historical
32 flares/chaff at top tier sounds like a no to me
unless gaijin finnaly decides to add ecm