you mean denmark thats part of the swedish tree most likely?
1 Like
It still has 0 vehicles in Sweden 🤷
i take it you missed the introduction of the CV9035DK?
2 Likes
It would appear so
Still doesn’t take away the Danish availability to Germany until confirmed to be part of Sweden by someone who has a voice on the matter
i mean they said skandinavian vehicles would go to sweden
You just want to avoid switzerland to germany dont you?
1 Like
That’s one part of it, but considering that the topic is about Polish F-16 you can assume my stance on that too
I mean they can add Danish vehicles to other tech trees as well just like they did with Romania and Canada
Romania is dedicated to italy, thise arent being placed anywhere else either tjis is stated by gajin.
Canada has no nation so it gets placed anywhere.
Denmark is part of the scandinavians thats supposed to go to sweden, it aint being added to germany
1 Like
Who said that it has to only go to Sweden? They have as much connections with Germany as they have with Sweden. Going by that logic Poland should be reserved for Warsaw Pact or UK with France
Polish vehicles only went to their country of origin, no polish vehicle is just placed into a tree because of relationship
This cant be compared
The concept of a sub tree/ sub nation says that
1 Like
Dude like it or not Denmark will end up in Sweden Tech tree.
CV9035DK was just a beginning, get ready for Danish Leopard2A7V.
Sweden already has a sub tree. Denmark can’t be a Swedish sub tree because it already has one. Danish vehicles of German origin should go to Germany
The swedish sub tree are all scandinavian nations.
Just like it was said that all minor axis nations gonna go to italy.
What do you not understand about this.
Wether sweden needs it doesnt matter.
Did france need benelux with 3 countries? No
Did UK need india when they already had SA? No
We are just telling you that it is a fact that danish vehicles are going to sweden
And a nation cam have more then 1 sub tree as well
1 Like
Nations can and already have multiple sub nations, britain for example has 2 sub nations now iirc.
who said that?
Having individual vehicle from a country being added to a nation doesn’t make it a sub-tree of that country.
2 Likes
Brits have individual vehicles from Australia, India and others but that doesn’t make them sub trees of those nations.
1 Like
Smin for one,
But gajin staff confirming that counts
There is no historical basis for adding Poland to Germany. When discussing vehicles/airplanes related to World War II, it is unnecessary, and besides, Germany invaded Poland, so there are no grounds for it. In fact, it would be politically questionable. During the Cold War, Germany already had the GDR, so it is unclear what Poland could add. In more recent times, there is no reason or necessity to consider Poland as a sub-tree of Germany. If you don’t have a top-tier jet, the responsibility lies solely with the Luftwaffe, not with others. There are nations that have been denied effectively used armaments, so there is no reason to always complain. In a few months, the Eurofighter will be introduced, so sometimes you need to know how to be content.
Recognizing Poland’s important role in NATO today, it is unclear why it should be included as a sub-tree of Germany. Germany is just one of the many NATO members; in this case, it would be better to place the Polish F-16 in the American tree.
2 Likes
that argument is invalid trought the UK gripen and the japanish F-16AJ just saying, gajin already showed they will do stuff to fill those holes
and no, multiple times confirmed, the EFT isnt close, thats why we are looking for an alternative
well no lol that one wouldnt make much sense either lol, poland could at least be explained trough central europe connections and poland would display the nato role as a german sub tree just as much as in a us one.
That being said i am not for a polish sub tree, it would be better in a east europe tree or standalone