Bro used chatgpt ☠️
3 Likes
I’d rather just get the F-15GA when they add the modern F-15s as it was designed and sent to Germany for trials
lmao
1 Like
the first radar was jointly developed with marconi PS-05/A - Wikipedia
same goes for other things like the ejection seat,
you could even make an argument about the engine, since its a version of the GE F404
Volvo RM12 - Wikipedia
then it is not 100% domestic but indeed went with the help of other companies
Didn’t Germany Use the Mav-Gs? Also their F-4s could carry the GBU-10/11s
Maybe, I made the report about Ds & Gs - it got acknowledged but so far, Gaijin hasn’t done anything about it.
As for GBU-10/11s, if Germany was going to get them, they’d have already.
Then again, unless they get tripple rails for Mavs, they’d still be worse than many other CAS jets.
since when did germany ever have a meta top rank aircraft?
It’s furina. They just cope about how much Germany suffers, when they are arguably the second best treated nation.
they are not coping; they are literally just calling him out for his hipocresy, Germany is not the second best treated that goes for sweden first being russia, third being china and then Germany, and even so, I don’t know what part of best treated is it about, Germany gets some stuff for an update and people are already making a scandal about it for nothing, like when it got the 2A7V together with russia’s T90M and America’s M1A2SEPV2 brought incorrectly together with the 2A7V being brought incorrectly when its the best leopard germany will get for now
1 Like
So you want an aircraft that would be Typhoon’s BR, or Mig-29G’s BR. And one that is better served in a Polish tech tree.
Tornado IDS ASSTA for me is 4 free kills in ground RB.
Of course F/A-18 with AMRAAMs would be Typhoon’s BR as well, so you’d have to have a Swiss F/A-18 with 9Ms and AIM-7s only which would also be Mig-29G’s BR, and have the same GBU loadout as Tornado IDS.
That’s my perspective playing Germany top BR for ground and air.
Because they went on holiday there in 1939
1 Like
There is no hornet variant that comes even remotely close to a typhoon.
C/D maybe with the stupid number of AMRAAMs they can carry
1 Like
10 AMRAAMs + 2 9Ms/6 AMRAAM 6 AIM-9M loadout on a conventional BVR-dogfight airframe I’d consider equivalent to Tranch 1 Typhoon’s 8 or 10 total missile loadout.
Well in simulations even the super hornet was completely and utterly outclassed by the EF2000. The only thing it would do better than the typhoon is air to ground, as the early tranche EF were focused entirely on air superiority.
Except the typhoon has a radar levels above the super hornet’s, and has much better flight performance to achieve speed/altitude prior to a fox3 launch.
It would heavily depend on the loadout of the typhoon.
AESA + 10 AMRAAM would give the F18 an advantage in BVR,
But if it’s an RAF Typhoon with 6x ASRAAM, 6x AMRAAM and PIRATE IRST. Then the F18 would struggle under the right conditions
TWR allows you to get to high speed/altitude, and therefore increase the range of your AMRAAMS. The TWR of the typhoon would leave the hornet in the dust.
If pure missile quantity was the defining factor then you would see more fighters designed around that criteria.
Both radars will get AMRAAM’s max range.
SMT’s radar is better than Su-27’s BY FAR, but ultimately both are strong enough for what War Thunder does.
F-18 will get to altitude at least as fast as F-16C will having a TWR of ~1.3:1 at speed.