So why i get at least 1 intentional teamkill in game everyday? Or should i spent 10%, 15% of my game time on recording server replay and write a high quality report everyday? Sir?
So what you actually want is to pay to ban people you don’t like.
1 Like
So u mean if the ban is justicial depends on if the player or the staff to spend the time and effort on making or checking report, not depends on what the reported guy did.
Of course. Life is hard and unfair, and so is the game. Somewhere there has to be an end to being able to buy advantages.
And in my eyes that is simply immoral.
1 Like
How about you quit being a lazy tool and just report shit properly? It’s not hard, takes all of 3 minutes to write a competent report.
Same bad player, same bad action, once it’s not the player spending time and effort on reporting but the staff spending time and effort on checking then it becomes from a should-ban to a shouldn’t-ban.
loading the server replay alone would take 3 minute, OK? and it is not 100% to successfull loaded, sometimes u can spend a day and it never loads
1 Like
Do you access things on a toaster?
Do you ever get a response from gaijin for your report?
Also, even it is comfirmed as kinda TK, it wouldn;t lead to ban ok? someone needs to TK alot to get banned
Note i wont buy golden eagles for tk lol
And hasn;t i mentioned that player can use premium-report 1-3times per MONTH? how could that lead to “ban anyone u want”?
i don’t understand just deal with it
What do u think about accountant or lawyer? People should do all paper works on tax and laws by themselves instead of buying service from accountant or lawyer?
What i propose is pay for “lawyer” instead of pay for “judge”. Premium report is to pay for the staff to check the report manually so that it won;t be put into “trash"or"later” by the bots if it is not "good quaility"enough, not to pay the company to say that report is valid disregarding the facts.
Correct me if I misunderstood you, but why should anyone pay to report someone? If someone is being toxic in-game (e.g., racist, xenophobic, or disrespectful), I do not believe anyone should pay 100 golden eagles to have that individual punished.
5 Likes
You are supposed to pay a lawyer to file a criminal complaint with the police or public prosecutor’s office?
That actually exists, but it is reserved for rich and prominent people to pay a lawyer for something like that. And in a functioning, fair legal system, it has no effect on the speed or outcome of the proceedings.
If it were otherwise, we would be living in an arbitrary system.
Sorry, @ [本好きの下剋上]
1 Like
Me, of course, don’t want to pay for that. But even hackers won’t be 100% punished in time, let alone toxic behavior. IF gaijin has 10k capacity on checking report, and there are 8k hackers and 18k toxic players, then the only way is to rise the capacity. And i think gaijin won;t rise the capacity without we paying.
1 Like
Imho your proposal looks kind of strange, but with some adjustments you might be able to create a rather interesting feature.
If you charge somebody for reporting another player - this makes only sense:
-
If the reports would be actually be processed and reporting itself has severe consequences in case the report is actually reporting a ToS violation
-
If a report leads to a severe consequence / punishment the reporting player gets a refund of his 100 GE and a bonus of 100 GE.
Imho you simply assume gaijin is actually interested in punishing malicious behaviour and would be interested in actual fair play.
If you see a guy with ~80 team kills in a short time period still active in the game - it is more than obvious that you follow an illusion…
1 Like
Imho the OP refers to unpunished behaviour in-game - and not to this kindergarden chat ban nonsense…
Firstly, I don;t seek the change on the outcome (outcome should depend only on facts).
But, about the “speed”, i think it is not simply “effect” or “not effect”. It should effect the speed, but in a fair system, the basic speed that is “not effected” is fast enough, and “faster” is for those in special need. Also the same thing on “convenient”, people can pay to be more convenient , but the basic without paid should be conventient enough.