I’m not disagreeing that it existed- but to put it in Gaijin’s words.
“Yes, we still do not have enough information on these machines, and as far as is possible to judge, it is impossible to find the missing info. There will be too much room for guesswork and paper design, which we would like to avoid.” (found at this link)
So, what I am really saying, is that while it definitely existed, too much about how it existed is unknown for it to be reasonable to add in game as a “non-paper” vehicle.
I would agree with gaijin there, if they also hadn’t already added some extremely dubiously documented vehicles.
Brother Wikipedia is like half your sources. And almost all the rest of them don’t provide proper sources either, and are mainly just “paper this” and “guesswork that”.
I’ve had this discussion a million times, I’m not having it again. For the same reason Gaijin isn’t adding the O-i, it should not add the Panther II in its “intended” (or at least, what the Internet thinks was intended without proof) form.
to be fair the tank is there thats proof it exists i dont see the problem as it just be a upgraded panther g similar to the jumbo as it would have a panther G turret on a new hull
Please read the works of jentz and doyle, those are not without proof.
I could remove wiki and my suggestion wouldn’t change at all lol.
They have reconstructed the design accurate to the original drawings of the turret.
Besides, the suggestion moderators agreed.
Would you care to share that with everyone else?
I don’t see why you can’t just post them here.
He is refering to this one.
Ah, that is just a shore gun installation.
um, clearly it isn’t
I have a larger version. You can clearly see it is mounted on a concrete bunker and looks nothing like the O-I’s turret.
So as far as I’m aware it is a picture of coastal artillery.
maybe it’s not O-I, but I believe it is linked to the project: https://forum-ru-cdn.warthunder.com/original/3X/f/a/fa056e3791feff8a1dac229d649e6001f0f5f7db.webp
That’s a fictional design.
clearly you do not know what fiction means
Show me the proof it’s real. A picture posted on a forum page with no real citations qualifies as fake in any academic subject ever. As far as I, or anyone that has experience in academia is concerned, that is very fictional.
I have a soulution to your promblem
sensha tank japans first tank it would play similar to char 2
heres its track link
two photographs and multiple soviet report documents are the proofs themselves
A thinly armored coastal gun on a concrete bunker is not a superheavy tank.
