Change BR for Top Tier Jets 12.0 to 13.0,
11.0+ jets shouldnt face super OP jets with strong radar.
1 Like
That’s just not true for the Tiger II H. It loses out on some pen but gets a much better reload rate. The T29 is not nearly a full BR better than the German heavies.
3 Likes
So I dont like the idea of the leo a1a1 (the tech tree version) going up to 9.0 I mean it doesnt have the best armor or rounds and it doesnt have thermals or a laser rangefinder and it should fight 10.0 Tanks
6 Likes
Suggestion:
Put the Hunter FGA.9 to rank 6, and give it CCIP.
Reason:
Its the highest BR jet at rank 5, and its got missiles so it doesn’t make any logic to be at rank 5, and IRL it had CCIP so give it CCIP.
3 Likes
I wonder if a similar result could have been achieved by changing the matchmaking spread from 1.0 to 0.7. If its done this way, the decompression doesn’t then result in compressing the tanks that got moved with higher vehicles.
2 Likes
T29 and IS-6 going up seems pointless as they’re fine where they are. And 9.3 (now 9.7) lineups get to face T90A’s and Tunguskas, sounds totally fair and fun.
3 Likes
And yet again, not a single Bf 109 in Arcade mode, has it’s BR raised . . . . and this has been for years now. The Swedish push planes went from 4.0 to 5.3 and they merely have better guns, which frankly should have just been adjusted early on instead of continually raising their BR. The 109’s are among the fastest planes below 5.3 BR
Here are much more accurate and game balancing BR’s for these planes:
Bf 109 E-3 - 2.7 > 3.3
Bf 109 E-4 - 3.0 > 3.3
Bf 109 F-1 - 3.0 > 3.7
Bf 109 F-2 - 3.0 > 4.3
Bf 109 F-4 - 4.3 > 5.3
Bf 109 F-4 (trop) - 4.3 - 5.0
Because of the last time they “sped up” Arcade plane modelling,(and this has been a while back now) these particular planes have insane flight models, they accelerate a great deal better, have better climbs rates and never lose energy as compared to almost everything they face and have been OP by a large margin for a couple of years. I can only assume that they do not reflect this because of skewed data that they go by when making such decisions. And I also have to assume that this same data does not truthfully reflect these plane’s abilities due to so many players using them and many just not doing very well and/or just going head on a vast majority of the time. Which doesn’t make these planes any less unbalanced sitting at their current BRs. I would personally love see a “roll back” of the last speed up change to bring things back to a more normal & less “Tail Spin” style of game play, but I doubt that will ever be possible. At the very least, please do something about this single group of plane models and how far off their performances are compared to the planes with similar BR’s that are set at the same BR’s. Completely ignoring all these plane models cannot be a mere oversight. For those of us that prefer mid-tier prop plane combat, these planes are a menace and cause unfair and skewed game play in every battle they are in . . . simply seeing the number of these planes that are in each and every game should be a huge clue . . . everyone that plays at these BR’s can admit to this . . . . thank you
If he Rooilkat MTTD can go up in battle rating and it should get DM33 for 9.0/9.3 or DM63 for 9.3/9.7. If it doesn’t get one of these round, then the reload speed should be 6 sec for “soft balancing”
3 Likes
Please change the title to “Planned Battle Rating recompression changes”
2 Likes
Tiger II isn’t inferior at all compared to a T29, maybe you just don’t know where to aim for. Tiger II gets way better reload while the T29 gets better damage. I have both and I take the SLA over it any day. Also don’t forget the 10.5 Tiger II gets also to stay at 6.7.
And the T34 is worse than the Tiger II, try out both and you will surely do better with the Tiger II (because spoiler it’s better).
8 Likes
It seems they missed the T64’s also hope they alteast revert some of the changes and also do top tier a little
of mk.2 has DM23 not 33 lmao, that’s just incorrect
2 Likes
aaand You want to see Super Sabre has same BR with Hunter F.1 and F-2 Sabre?
Are you joking?
is-6’s still face Bradley’s.
t-55a still face leo 1a5’s, type 16’s, type 74’s etc…
its highly nice that 6.3s will never face those machines, but there is still alot of issues within all these changes overall… still making grinding, playing overall worse…
yes a few 6.7’s-6.3 mostly in the american / russian tech tree with a whopping 9, with russia having most being in is-2/tank destroyers with germany being 6 and every other nation staggering behind, will be nicely happy never facing 2 machines, while 100’s others still have issues… that is the point im getting at.
even a .7 uptier for 6.7 is going to be STILL a struggle in general.
wwll tanks will still fight m48a2’s and marders etc. the issue is 6.3’s that this planned BR changes fixes, not the larger healthy BR area of 6.7/6.3
its honestly not fixing an issue in my book.
Re 2005 cannot hold itself against the current US 5.7-6.3, and now it gets to face P80’s and Kikka’s))))))
You know why it goes up, because the people that do play it consistently are also those people who have no problem to take on all the fighters while the Ger+Ita team has 4 288s and a K4/Do335. Not because the plane is good, but because US players expect just a statpadding adventure at that BR and generally play with their brains off.
Re 2005 would be ok at 5.3, it’s poor at 5.7, and definitely nowhere near good enough for a 6.0.
But hey, BY ALL MEANS destroy the last parts of this game I actually enjoy. Lets move the 2005 to 7.0 where it truly belongs so I can fight hordes of La200, La15, and Su11s who will still turnfight me and lose.
12 Likes
So basically everything goes up, did you guys even read the table? AMX-30’s going up why? I feel like someone just copy pasted all the names and just put them up in BR.
2 Likes
Yeah, I dunno about that. I mean, yes, of course, most vehicles facing a fully down tiered rival would probably have an advantage in that situation, but I honestly can’t remember playing the T29 in a full or even mostly full down tier. If anything, it’s been full or near full up tiers for that tank when I take it out… and it doesn’t do well at all against 7.7s or 8.0s. And now it has the opportunity to face 8.3s? Yeah, no… it’s a bad move.
1 Like
Rip my Japanese 9.0 lineup.
1 Like
T29 has superior penetration, superior armor, and slightly superior maneuvering.
I own the T34, I can lolpen Tiger 2s, they can’t lolpen me back.
The focus of this decompression is 6.0 - 6.7.
It’ll take time to move on from there, but you’ll see Maus is unchanged.
Also, T-55A should see Leopard 1A5s, I say this as a T55A player.
And I as a Tiger 2 or T26E5 have a fighting chance against M48s & Marders, I have no chance against M60s and T-54 1951s.
I’m not arguing for compression though?? Use your common sense and put that feeble mind of yours to work. If there are more BRs where vehicles can be spread across, there will be less compression as there can be a better spread of the vehicles. Please learn to read and exercise your comprehensive reading skills as well as that organ that your hollow skull holds
1 Like