even when you get a downtier you usually so slow by the time you get to A point your team has killed half the enemy and already camping the spawns
I don’t think the Type 87 RCV (P) should go to 7.7. It has the same gun/ammo as the SUB-I-II, about the same mobility too…same NVD, smokes…honestly it’s just a SUB-I-II that can scout. It’s fine where it is.
3 Likes
Agreed, that autocannon is garbage and its already is at 7.3. To 7.7? lol no one will touch it.
1 Like
i think they just wanna get it away from ww2 they just moving up stuff with stabs but it really isnt that good rn so i think its fine at 7.3
1 Like
Decrease battle rating Air realistic battle of another aircraft rank 5
Canberra B Mk 2 8.3 → 8.0
J21A-2 6.7 → 6.3
B-57A 8.3 → 8.0
Tu-14T 8.0 → 7.7
Tu-4 (USSR & China) 8.0 → 7.7
Vautour IIA 9.0 → 8.7
Vautour IIB 9.0 → 8.3
R2Y2 Kai V1 8.0 → 7.7
R2Y2 Kai V2 8.0 → 7.7
R2Y2 Kai V3 8.0 → 7.7
MiG-9 (USSR & China) 7.3 → 7.0
IL-28 8.0 → 7.7
F-84F (USA, Germany, Italy, France, Israel) 8.3 → 8.0
4 Likes
so 8000 5.7–> 5.3 or lower very poor climb rate average turn rate terrible thrust the good fire power and maneuverability at high speeds doesn’t make up for the average performance
Another thing I just realized is that Japan doesn’t have any other 7.7 vehicles and all it’s 8.0 vehicles are going up to 8.3. So then why would you use it over the non (p) version? I hope Gaijin reconsiders this one.
kugelblitz should down to 6.7, since in 7.0 it has no lineup and it’s just a WW2 vehicle.
ZSU-37-2 and M163 should go to 8.0, there’s no reason for them to stay at 7.7 when nearly every vehicle get a br raise.
3 Likes
it really is a a shame im hoping with some of the stronger vehicles going up it gets butter but i don’t think it will
1 Like
Undoing these changes before they will be zapozon only a vocal minority because I want to dominate with my heavy tanks without any competition despite the fact that 90 percent of the Cold War tanks they can meet have zero armor except for the T-54s which do not have adequate space
A-7K need much lower BR in air realistic battles.
2 Likes
from what i find the tanks that dominate ww2 tanks arent the ones with stabs its usually things like russian heavy tanks the problem with a lot of the lower tiers can be that you are just unable to pen that is not an issue at the higher brs its usually who can fire faster
Aviation Simulator: F2G
/ Current BR 6.7---->Moved to :6.0
Arguments:
1)Uses only 50cal MGs while crushing majority of 6.7 use multiple cannons and mgs.
2)Gets destroied in energy and speed fights by jet fighers like YAK 15,ME262,Kikka,J21RA and this is in the best case scenario where 6,.7 is top tier.
3)Planes with similar performance sit at br 6.0 like :I225,YAK3U,TA152H,F8F,LA9,G56,Ju288 ,there is no argument for F2G to be 6.7 while these bunch are 6.0.
4)The plane is literally useless in an uptier versus 7.0-7.3 and do I need to mention 7.7,its max uptier?
5)6.0 lobbies have way more pilots in them than the barren 6,7.
Make the F2G playable in sim !
It is obvious that the F2G sim br needs to be updated just like the realistic br was some time ago.Attached this as a reply to your comment so more sim stuff gets togheter and seen since we are overwhelmingly a minority in this thread .
Is it being shot by a flying Abrams or something? Why are you aiming from a significantly higher position that negates T-90A’s angling?
Everyone I’ve seen claiming that T-90A has bad armor on this thread, have shown screenshots of the armor viewer at least 20º too high to negate the constructional armor slope angle.
Is this to push some narrative or something?
1 Like
Although you refer to Simulator battles - i do not see any reason for the BP B7A2 to be superior to the tech tree one. I flew around 1,5k battles in the TT version and a some missions with the BP version - in Air RB, with joystick, SFC without instructor and was actually extremely disappointed from the BP version.
From my perspective the more horsepower of the BP version can’t be used effectively - the guy in charge for the engine settings should be fired immediately - the plane overheats like hell with WEP - in total opposition to the tech tree version, which can be easily flown with infinite WEP at higher altitudes. The. new engine cools down very badly (overheating at ice cold maps above 5.000 meters at higher speed is really a joke), the TT version not.
In order to compensate the overheating you have 2 options:
- MEC which reduces the overall performance to the TT version
- Fly without WEP at 100% the whole match, similar performance to TT
Yes, it is slightly faster and the handling feels better, but imho this results mainly from the reduced minimum fuel (new: 57 minutes, TT 90 minutes).
And yes, flown with joystick, SFC and without instructor it is a beast in turnfights in Air RB, but you still can’t catch the usual late game runners like P-51s / P-47s / Wyverns…
“so it cannot be overpressured” KV-2 would like to argue with that. Yes, I realize it’s not something the IT-1 should ever fight, but I personally know for a fact that the IT-1 can be killed by a KV-2’s HE hitting nothing more than the rocket rack. I’ve done it dozens of times.
1 Like
Because gaijin is high, that said the Type 90 is better than every single vehicle you just listed so not sure why you think it belongs at 10.7 regardless.
Besides, moving it to 9.0 won’t make it face any tougher opponents than before any of these BR changes. If it says at 8.7, it will, in fact, get to face even easier opponents than it used to, which is not fair to the uptiered 7.3 tanks.
Much more recent video, and you can see the difference overpressure makes.
Extremely survivable against bombs too.
" The T-62 maximum average rate of fire is limited to 8 rounds per minute"