You don’t know that I’ve played a lot with 2a4.
I met T90a many times, there are no problems
You just have to be careful and learn how to aim the weak point of the T90.
IS-6 getting 7.3? Only advantage over IS-3 is better mobility and faster reload (because armor is not better). Shell (BR-471) penetrates only 205 mm and it won’t even get BR-471D which penetrates 230 mm because it would not be historical (IS-6 is a prototype from 1944 and BR-471D is a postwar shell). For now IS-6 is just a fine addition to soviet 7.0 which recompenses a little bit long reload of IS-3 and its mobility. Same thing with Object 248 which was in line-up with IS-2 (6.3) but now it is at 6.7 because it dares to reload faster than IS-2? Penetration is almost the same. Btw. hull is from 5.3 (IS-1/early IS-2). For me it is destroying a pretty line-up in which can be a premium tank. Now at 7.3 IS-6 won’t have any line-up because T-54 1949 and BMP-1 are going at 8.0
2 Likes
and you keep saying bullshit about nato mbts
there is no way the IPM1 which has worse pen and armour and thermals should go up while the T-90A which has workable armour gets to chill killing all the poor previosly 9.3 vehicles that are being moved up
3 Likes
Show me where I have said anything anti-Russian. I think you need to go take a break from the internet for today.
5 Likes
can we get the is 3 and is 4m and is6 and is 7 and is 8 aall at 8.0
yes but look at the comparison. I didn’t say it’s impossible to penetrate the t90, but while you have to aim the 2a4, you shoot the t90 into a gigantic weak spot. it’s not balanced if you put one tank everywhere and the other just on small ones. And your probably an somewhat experienced player, but there are lot of people with less experience
1 Like
there is nothing wrong with them going to 11.0
3 Likes
I totally agree that the IPM1 and M1A1 are too strong for their current BR. But I offered a different solution which is removing M900 and M829A1 from those tanks instead of moving them up in BR. So go spread your lies somewhere else.
2 Likes
why are we getting political now that has nothing to do with them game
6 Likes
IS-6 getting 7.3? Only advantage over IS-3 is better mobility and faster reload (because armor is not better). Shell (BR-471) penetrates only 205 mm and it won’t even get BR-471D which penetrates 230 mm because it would not be historical (IS-6 is a prototype from 1944 and BR-471D is a postwar shell). For now IS-6 is just a fine addition to soviet 7.0 which recompenses a little bit long reload of IS-3 and its mobility.
BR-412D APCBC also has worse slope modifiers than BR-412B APHEBC. It has better flat pen but the 412B round performs much better against highly sloped armor, specifically armor that is made up of multiple thinner plates, like an M4A3E2 Jumbo. Overall I find myself using BR-412B more than 412D.
IS-6 reloads quite a bit faster than IS-3, at 15.8 seconds compared to 20 seconds with both tanks having maximum reloading skill. On top of that IS-3 has a ready rack while IS-6 does not. Once the ready rack of the IS-3 is expended (5 rounds), the reload is multiplied by 1.5x, leading to a 35 second reload even with a maxed out crew.
Mobility, much faster reload, turret traverse, and armor that still overall works against AP rounds definitely makes the IS-6 better in my eyes.
Same thing with Object 248 which was in line-up with IS-2 (6.3) but now it is at 6.7 because it dares to reload faster than IS-2? Penetration is almost the same.
You’ve just explained why the Object 248 should be higher BR than the IS-2s. Significantly faster reload (8.55 seconds compared to 20.83 seconds with fully maxed out crew) and equivalent penetration power.
i dont think m1a1 should have ever gotten m829a1 m829 was fine at 10.3 /10.7
2 Likes
If they do get moved up i atleast hope the IPM1 stays but if not then gaijin should either remove 3BM60 from the T-90A or move it up alongside
1 Like
what are you on about? A lot of players that have it that bring it to top tier is because they’re low level players that pair it up with the prem abram kvt, aim. It’s not because it’s good, it because they don’t have lineups
The option to remove the shell doesnt help, they are still strong so they deserve to stay 11.0.
Do you remember when they were 10.3? It was totally OP as hell.
yes on 11.0
2 Likes
So the Caernarvon is going up to 7.7 for some reason however the conqueror, M103 and IS-4M are staying at 7.7. What’s the point of playing the Caernarvon when those 3 will be the same br as it.
M48’s should be atleast 7.7 alongside the centurions if the change is going through with those vehicles already being moved up there is no reason that they should be left out whilst every other medium and MbT of the 1940’s-1960’s Cold War era tank are being moved around.
The T-54’s shouldn’t really be the same br as the Type 59 which has a one plane stabiliser and should defiantly not be the same br as the type 69 which has a two plane stabiliser and a laser rangefinder.
Alongside many other vehicles that are gonna be stuck in a new stupid compression range which won’t shut the people crying about Cold War in WW2 br ranges cause vehicles like the ratel 20 isn’t being moved, still quite a few light vehicles of the Cold War era there whilst on the other end of the spectrum previous vehicles that didn’t have to face the onslaught of premium spam from 10.0 premiums will now have to endure that awful gameplay.
3bm60 is basically the same round that the Leclerc fires at 11.7 i don’t think the t90 needs it
7 Likes
Rooikat Mk1D should also get a RoF increase to around 10-12/min,
with a 76mm APFSDS you barely get any spalling, no NVD which is kinda standard at it’s BR for others.
NVD wont matter because no night battles anymore
1 Like
Point proven, go to reddit if you wanna cope
1 Like