Decompression + shouldn’t face ww2. Simple.
Nah. same capability as Tiger 2 roughly. Actually usually slightly worse in practice.
I could whinge about the AML and EBR 1963 being more French light nerfs for the sake of it but I’ve two things to oppose out of experience.
T29 to 7.3, and P-59 to 5.7
I get what you’re doing, decompressing whole BR ranges and major vehicles. But the T29, amazing as it is, sits as a solid 7.0, and a tank doomed to fail at 7.3. Inferior armor to the T32s in exchange for a better gun at a tier where ATGMs and HEATFS is starting to come out (including staying in touch with much of what’s going up)? Detestably worth, and honestly kills one of the most fun lineups in all of GRB. MBTs and lights are the powerhouses starting at 7.3, less so now that Centurions once again move up, but I can’t see people holding on to this (I’ll see how 7.3 goes, and if I don’t like it, I’m dropping the lineup entirely)
As for the Airacomet, it’s been 5.3 its entire life and really has never seen a need to go higher. Inflated stats due in part to the 288 is not justification. Especially since the D-9 is still a 5.0 for some god forsaken reason. Also convince me it’s on par with the LF mk9 Spitfires, it’s not. It’s a plane that does alright in ARB, but primarily functions as a GRB air superiority fighter, and uptiering a plane with no hardpoints for being good in GRB feels like a poor call.
Keep both these where they are in my opinion.
Where is the equivalent to the bmp2m in other trees ? all i see is gimped nato stuff because russia suffers or do you mean the wiesel or the puma with gimped armor gun and NO ATGMS ? maybe the wiesel ? that drops half of its atgms in the dirt ? oh wait its not just the wiesel but most nato atgms
Meanwhile russia gets a brain free point and click game #russiasuffers
get out
1 Like
Yes, but it is not necessary for them to make a mess either, now there are tanks that were already mediocre in BR 7.7 and are now at BR 8.0 to face other 8.0 much higher performance.
1 Like
It really does matter. A Strela invalidates all fixed wing CAS within its BR range. There are about 2 aircraft in the game that have flares below 9.7 (it doesn’t become common until 10.3). Whats more annoying is IR AA’s dont do anything against the biggest threat at those tiers, which is choppers. Choppers that can outrange all contemporary AA’s. Fixed wing CAS vs gun AA is by no means perfect, but it was workable. IR missiles just break the whole system and makes it pointless.
2 Likes
Wiesel doesn’t change its playstyle or how good it is by being decompressed upwards.
I checked the list, very few tanks moved around that didn’t deserve it. If you want to convince me otherwise you’ll have to start using specific examples.
“IR missiles” aren’t the problem. Stingers don’t do jack shit and kill nobody paying attention. It’s just the Strela having far better agility/tracking than the other manpads such as the stinger/mistral
I wrote it before, Magach 3(ERA) BR 8.0 with APDS and HEAT-FS while the Magach 5 in BR 8.0 is exactly the same except it takes the M111 which is only infinitely superior to the M392A1.If you look you will see that not all the tanks have had the BR change and unless it’s a bug, there’s going to be some imbalance.
Surprised nobody talking about flareless subsonic jets in ARB in this topic…
there is a massive lack of people asking for these same decompression changes to air… air needs it FAR more than ground EVER has.
The current 8.3BR-10.3BR is exactly what is happening in current ground battles
Except FAR worse.
1 Like
It’s decompression my guy… reading comprehension at an all time low
The current 8.3BR-10.3BR is exactly what is happening in current ground battles
This game does not work like that. The two tanks are mechanically identical besides ammo which is now identical. You can’t simply change reload for one but not the other. On top of that they are literally both autoloaded so it has a hard number it has to go by.
Decompression? There are barely any 9+/- planes in the br changes. F-86? It already sees it, the lowest F-86 is 8.3. Mach 2? Only at 36k+ alt. The wings on this are more likely to break well before reaching mach 2 at any altitude most fights occur at. Silly? I’m wondering why your comparing a turn fighter to an energy fighter. You should be comparing the lighting to the F-104 in which case its worse in every way.
You really bad in the T114 or something? The vehicle does not belong at 6.7.
what about the ratel 90 that thing should go to 6.3 @Stona_WT. also I didn’t know I could ping why isn’t the xm1 going up either its really fast has decent armor its going to crush new 8.3 vehicles
Thread is about decompression, not compression.
Okey, take out your 8.0 US lineup and bring out the F84G against a Strela. Tell me how many targets you are able to strike and how many missiles you are able to evade. Even something with significantly more performance wont be striking any targets effectively.
Because its compression? It’s self explanatory. The Sa’ar does not deserve to go down in BR. Shafir 2s are excellent missiles for it and justify its BR entirely alone.
Please rearrange France’s tree at rank 6
For many trees, there is a lot of consistency in vehicle types however france Rank 6 severely lacks it.
On the far right it’s tank destroyers but for some reason the AMX 10 RC (a light) followed by AMX 30 RC (medium) followed by a light despite most of the branch being TDs.
However the far left side has a tank destroyer (mephisto) despite being mostly made up of light tanks.
I suggest the mephisto switch with the SK 105A2 and the medium AMX 30 ARCA be moved to go after the AMX 30 Brenus
There appears to be an error. The Z-19 and Z-19E, listed on the aviation page, are shown as being at 10.3 in the “was” column, but they are currently at 11.0.
Is this document suggesting then that they will be moved from 11.0 to 10.7?
1 Like