- It’s decompression.
- The IS-6 isn’t fine currently. It’s overperforming pretty heavily. Nobody at 6.0-7.0 that uses conventional ammo can really effectively deal with it.
It’s not decompression. The overall compression of the whole BR range from 1.0 to 11.7 is the same. To actually decompress it is necessary to increase the maximum BR and spread the vehicle BRs accordingly.
I will say it is a step towards decompresison.
Even a Pz-4 with a long 75mm gun or an American 76mm can kill it from the front with a well placed shot. People just refuse to learn how to kill it.
Seriously, is this another example of bias toward gaijin’s favourite nation Germany. Did a single german plane get uptiered? Also the sdfz puma doesn’t get ranked the same way as other ground vehicles, so it will never be uptiered? Please think about how it makes you look when you do things.
it is, in fact, decompression. Not every area of the game is equally compressed. We have 7 BR ranges for just ~1936- ~1945 but have 4.7 BRs for 1945 to 2023+.
Which is why:
The overall compression of the whole BR range from 1.0 to 11.7 is the same
^ Does not matter.
GIVE PUMA SPIKES IF YOURE GOING TO KEEP MOVING IT UP! it makes no sense for it not to have them especially at 10.0.
Watching this be presented instead of putting a .5 BR in the game inbetween .3 and .7 is quite depressing.
When that would do more to decompress things more than just “Make the number bigger” forever.
the difference between a 6.7 and a 7.7 is usually quite noticable
But the difference between an 8.3 and 9.3 is DRASTIC in most cases, and sure there’s the 8.7 in there but at the same time even then some 8.3 compared to 8.7 is a nightmare as well.
Adding technically a 4th bracket for the BR would take adjusting, but would solve alot of the issues the game still faces now.
That is incorrect.
Than i had either watches very good pilots (3 times 4+ kills for MB 157 and 6 kills with J2M2 - each with one ammo load) or i need glasses…
How is he a Russian main when he is saying the IS-6 should be higher BR…?
Let me get this straight, I’m a russian main for telling you the IS-6 is overperforming and isn’t able to really be dealt with by lower BR tanks and should therefore be uptiered and that makes ME a russian main? Really?
the Object 120 isn’t gonna be 8.0?
that thing will shred anything it looks at regardless of its armor, has a good top speed and has a 10s reload to kill anything in the BR bracket. Very balanced.
4 Likes
Yea, this is no decompression. Thanks for making a lot of these tanks face even worse gear. A lot of the tanks moved to 8.0 or higher have no stabilization. Thanks for once again not listening to anything the community has been saying.
Please move the Japanese F-1 and or the F-104J to 10.0 air arcade so that the line up can play at 10.0 they don’t have countermeasures and at 10.3 they run into the USA Phantoms at 11.0. Its really hard to deal with the radar Aim 7 and all aspect missiles all the time in air arcade. Thank you
obj 120 can be 8.7 and do fine because of the bs shell it gets
I’d like a couple more vehicles to be part of the decompression;
T-72a 9.3 → 9.7
2s38 10.0 → 10.7
2s25 9.3 → 9.7
Xm1 (GM) 9.3 → 9.7
T-64a 9.0 → 9.3
T-64b 9.7 → 10.0
4 Likes
The leo 1 doesn’t have a stabilizer. at all.
1 Like
Was gun Stabilization not taken into consideration when doing these changes? A lot of tanks without any stabilizers are being pulled into a BR bracket that is completely dominated by stabilized vehicles. This doesn’t seem like a fully thought through change. The top BR ranges should have been extended to maybe 12.3 or even higher and anything from 7.0 to top tier should have been stretched out a little.
Shouldn’t the Object 122 ™ also receive the T62 reload buff from 6.5 to 7.5 rpm?
I don’t think the Strv 103s should go up, they have APDS but they lack mobility, they arent stabilized(you have to stop completely to fire at anything), lack good armor unless hulldown at range, and lack a turret. For higher BRs with more stabilizers and heat/APFSDS this would make them struggle. I think they have a good balance for keeping it at 7.7 vs turreted vehicles.
I do not think non stabilized vehicles like the AMX 30B2 (both variants), SK 105/JaPz.k A2 should go up. The lack of a stabilizer is a good balancing factor for them. Despite having darts since they would have to completely stop to fire at any enemy. They especially shouldn’t be fighting stabilized tanks with equivalent ammunition and mobility since these tanks are objectively worse than them. I think all the slow unstabilized and not well armored 8.3 tanks are fine at 8.3 and shouldn’t go to 8.7, they’re balanced around their bad/mediocre mobility, bad/mediocre armor, and lack of stabilizer and it makes them easy to handle for even 7.3 tanks.
QN506 to 10.0? The missiles are unreliable, the tank is slow, the armor is not good, it’s only benefit is the 30mm but it’s difficult to properly use it because of the bad mobility. I think this tank should be downtiered to 9.3 rather than being uptiered to 10.0.
The ZLT-11 should also stay at 9.3, it’s equivalent to the Type 16 and Centauro going to 9.3. It’s slightly better dart gives it a negligible performance increase over these since the mobility will always allow even low performance darts to be effective.
all the other changes are great though, decompression is always nice.
6 Likes
Type 90 is very much not a 10.7 tank. Next question?