I think PUMA shouldn’t be at 10.0, at the same br as the 2s38. In my opinion the 2s38 is good at 10.0 and better than the PUMA at most of the things so please don’t put the PUMA higher br.
So true, the T29 doesn’t deserve to go up in BR. It should be brought back to 6.7, just at the same BR as the T34 and T30. And if that doesn’t convince them, if Germany can have the King Tiger 105 then I think it would make sense to lower the BR for the T29. Even though it was at 7.0 before it didn’t do great against vehicles like the IS-6 considering those are two completely different vehicles and the IS-6 should go up. But for real, putting the T29 to 7.3 is not a great idea at all and if this does occur it will make this vehicle one of the most useless to play, it’s really sad in a way. Considering it’s a really fun tank to play as.
I flew it a few months back.
It’s nothing like it used to be: reduced turn, rudder lock up in a dive… not enjoyable.
I can’t imagine it going UP in BR.
The HMS glorious shouldn’t go up unless the Prinz Eugen goes with it. Yes it has bigger guns, but it fires every 30 seconds unlike the Prinz Eugen which is every 12, both have armoured turrets which are pretty much unpennable in a downtier but the Prinz Eugen has armour below the waterline protecting the ammunition unlike the Glorious which has significantly less. Both are a counter to each-other and are glass cannons, they should be at the same br there are significantly more Prinz Eugens than HMS Glorious’.
So 6.0-7.0 is slightly decompressed at the expense of 9.0-10.0 becoming even more compressed? Also a buff to all t54/55/62 tanks for no reason. Great update guys! Just change the br-spread in the matchmaker to 0.7 and stop with this useless shuffeling around that just move the worst issues around
T34 is far worse than the T29, it has a bigger gun yes, but the post pen damage of its main round isn’t great, the T29’s T13 round on the other hand is a very potent round which can very easily one shot any vehicle at its BR or higher due to the amount of explosive filler it has. So no, sorry but I disagree with you on that point.
Aviation Simulator: F2G / Current BR 6.7---->Moved to :6.0
Arguments:1)Uses only 50cal MGs while crushing majority of 6.7 use multiple cannons and mgs.
2)Gets destroied in energy and speed fights by jet fighers like YAK 15,ME262,Kikka,J21RA
3)Planes with similar performance sit at br 6.0 like :I225,YAK3U,TA152H,F8F,LA9,G56,Ju288 ,there is no argument for F2G to be 6.7 while these bunch are 6.0.
It is obvious that the F2G sim br needs to be updated just like the realistic br was some time ago.
Ground vehicle realistic:
Merkava 2D should remain at 9.3,it does not have the speed, the armor or the thermal sights to compete with tanks like M1,IPM,Challegner Mk3,ZTZ96,CV90105,LEO2A4,Turms,T80U and the list goes on.Making the Merkava 2D see those tanks more often is not a good idea,furthermore enhanced by the fact that Israel dosent have a lineup for 9.7,dragging all the Merkava 1 and 2 in a player’s lineup along into 10.7 while using the m111 round ,ammo used at 8.0 by the Magach 5.Do I need to also mention Israel only has 9.3 SPAA?
Im glad we have ground forces being decompressed I feel like we are gonna see a big spike in win rates for US below 9.7. Current 9.7-10 is a black hole so unless top tier is also moved up it’s gonna be bad.
Also, can we address US win rates for air rb below 10.7? Trying to play anything other than the US is just punishing. Maybe raise top BRs a bit so air can be moved around a bit? We still have vehicles with no access to flares fighting things with R60s and AIM-9Ls.
It was already bad enough having to dodge aim-9Gs and the like but things like the G.91Y/YS have no chance vs missiles.
The weasel is by far better than the M41D which sits much higher than it so no its not the worse
Just because you did well in a plane/tank doesn’t make it good. You have to look at its stats like I mentioned compared to other vehicles at that BR and the numbers of how it performs in battle. Please use propper arguments when replying other than: “I did good so your point is invalid”, “There are more OP/worse vehicles at that BR so why change anything”. If there are more vehicles that need a balancing fine, please list them and your reasons.
Gonna have to disagree, it’s a really solid light tank and I’ve used it a good bit(even if it is classified as a SPAA)
I would like to see it get a better round however.
We are finally seeing those creep going up in the br, nice chance but why it took so much time for gaijin to realize things like Type FPS and other wheeled creepies were over powered?
Also maybe now late war tanks and Korean War tanks will suffer less as the light tanks that plague 7.3 are moving up.
Well goodbye 8.7 Italy ground, you have to face overpowered premiums again.
I was not talking about any of the vehicles you mentioned and my point was to compare the stats of the vehicles(firepower, maneuverability, loadout, armor etc) AND how people perform in them.
What about these facing world war 2 tanks at 7.3? It’s funny how everybody remember the uptier but forget to remember how those tanks are broken facing world war 2 at 6.7 downtiers.
That is how balancing works not your or mine personal experience.
Can the XM8 get either M883 or M900 and go up tp 10.0 or 10.3? It was trailed with those rounds as part of its testing in the mid 90’s. The CCVL and the VFM5 are older than the XM8 but use more advanced ammo for example and that seems strange to not give the XM8 proper ammo and BR.
I agree that late WWII and post WWII vehicles need a decompression.
No.
T34 has a more powerful cannon if you look purely at penetration, yes, but the T29’s cannon is significantly more effective. Faster reload and significantly better one shot potential due to the T29’s APCBC-HE having overpressure enabled while the T34 is forced to use non explosive AP rounds. And all that for a loss of roughly 30 mm of pen, when the T29’s penetration is still enough for tanks at it’s BR.
There are more than just Tiger IIs in this game.