great cinema,the next destruction of my decks.
hey gaijin do you think i have a gold donkey at home who just claps the silverlions at me,do we get 1 million silver as a bonus for the snot?
Shot kal on 9.0 rofl . . against 10.0 now,cent X on 7.7 rest in peace british tank over 7.0
They bumped TURMS, 2S38 et cetera from 9.7 to 10.0, because the enemies they faced were to weak. Now they bumped those enemies, and effectively removed that 9.7->10.0 change they did earlier. TURMS/2S38 will fight the same enemies again.
1 Like
How can PT-76-57 be 8.3 and Leopard go to 8.0? Leopard is effectively armoured the same (which is nearly none to matter), has no stabiliser, no rangefinder, is less mobile and can shoot waaaaaay less often.
Leopard 1, if anything, should go to 7.7, max. In comparison, T-54s have at least decent-ish armour.
As i said somewhere earlier the puma we have in game never had spikes mounted
Gaijin is funny.
If you put the Puma to 10.0 at least give it the Spike missilles! It has no right being at 10.0 as an okayish IFV. Should have stayed at. 9.3 as it is now!
Radkampfwagen back to 9.7? No thermals still, okayish ammo, But Type 16, WMA, PTL and so on are still on a lower BR, with thermals and better Ammo? Keep it at 9.3. it’s good there and at least on par with the other wheeled vehicles.
If you put Gepard, Chieftain Marksman to 8.3 put the ZSU 23-4 to 8.3 to and ZSU 37-2 to 8.0. If some Radar using SPAAs go up, all should go up.
And no Change for Turms-T and 2S38. Still really anoying vehicles to fight at 10.0! Especially 2S38 which has the better gun, better Ammo, Better Tracking than for example Swedish CV9040 (beside the SPAA version dont get optical tracking anyway, even though they have IRL). so Please. put Turms-T to 10.3 and 2S38 to 10.7. This thing can pen Leo 2A4 up front! Just ridicoulus.
Ok update. decompressing the lower BRs but still need to get up way higher in BR overall! Make Put Modern MBTS up to 13.0 in tandem with the CAS elements. That would decompress a lot more, than just pushing everything higher and higher.
2 Likes
BO 105 PAH-1 (RB) 9.3>9.0
Since it has no RWR and also wors ATGM’s compared to BO 105 PAH-1A1, at the same BR…
So I suggest to move the First BO down to 9.0
It’s literally not decompression. There is no additional space added for the adjusted vehicles to go to, therefore they cannot be decompressed.
And while they may have been addressing it, this is a step backwards, because once again, there is no decompression, just moving the problem elsewhere.
It’s very simple logic. I refuse to give them credit for returning to their old ways.
1 Like
The vfm5 should probably stick at 9.3 or even move down to 9.0 if no changes are going to happen. There really is no reason in using it over any of the rooikat apart from the mk1, it shouldn’t be seen as an alternative to the xm8 but a down grade.
The rooikat MTTD should get dm33 and be moved to 9.3, it’s an amazing vehicle and I use it at top tier but it really should get a better round and just be moved up.
The centurion 105 should probably stick at 7.7 with how the apds rounds are acting currently. There is no reason I’m using it over the vickers mk1 as it has a slower fire rate and speed. It’s equivalent to the mk 3 as they get solid shot that can actually create spall.
3 Likes
type 90 isnt a 10.7 tank. its much better than that…
2 Likes
Tiger 2s will no longer face T-54s with APDS & HEATFS, that’s decompression. Very good.
I mean, this IS decompression, it just HAS to start from the bottom of the compression and go upwards. This (7.0) is about where most of the ground compression starts. Therefore it HAS to start here if we’re going to decompress.
What I am saying is, they almost certainly are going to decompress 10.0-11.7 again, and when that happens AFTER this happens, EVERYTHING will be decompressed and not just moving it.
1 Like
also worse ATGMs than the premium BO 105… who also has different ATGMs than the PAH-1A1… also the same BR. isn’t gaijin balance great?
especialy if you consider that his anti air sharpnell round inst work how it should since his release in the game.
1 Like
Just like the MUSS…
vehicles that are from the time when a qualitative transition has been made from one means and types of defense to other, more advanced ones.
When can we expect this decompression for air and naval? @Stona_WT
2 Likes
Please move the Lighting F.6/F.53 to 9.0 AB/RB with more vehicles being moved here there is even more reason to add something of a comparable air vehicle to 9.0/- lineups.
Okay I’m finally home… Let’s start from the bottom up.
Sa’ar 9.0 → 8.7
This thing is the most painful aircraft to play. It is extremely underpowered and has trouble accelerating at every speed, it bleeds all of its speed after a single turn and the second you take any external ordinance everything becomes even worse. It has no countermeasures, radar or RWR so it’s pretty much a sitting duck.
Vautour IIN Addition of Shafrir-2 AAM
This aircraft is currently identical to the Vautour IIA in terms of gameplay, offering no noticeable difference or advantage compared to the other Vautour. However it would greatly benefit from the addition of the Shafrir-2 Air-to-Air missile which would make it a decent interceptor apart from a suicide base bomber. (Shafrir-2 Report regarding the Vautour IIN was passed to the developers a few years ago for consideration but still nothing)
F-100D(FR) Addition of AIM-9E AAM / 9.3 → 9.0
I don’t understand why this is the only F-100 didn’t get the AIM-9E but has remained at the same br for so long… If it doesn’t get the upgraded missiles it should at least move down in br to compensate since it is a pretty sad plane.
Nesher 10.0 → 9.7
It’s just a worse Mirage… In every aspect. Its flight performance is miserable, its CAS capabilities are limited and its Air-to-Air loadout is tiny. It’s french counterpart not only has CCIP that the Nesher doesn’t have, it also gets the Magic 1 missile… stock!
Okay time for ground vehicles…
Merkava 2D Replace M413 with M426
Since it is going up in Battle Rating, it would greatly benefit from having a more reliable round. It would be a small but noticeable upgrade in its firepower, making it more consistent when dealing with enemies such as the Leopard 2A4 and T-72A Turms.
Merkava 3 Bet Baz (3C) should get its Baz FCS
I mean this is a no-brainer. This tank was introduced to the game missing its key differentiating feature which was the main part of its upgrade over the Merkava 3 Bet (3B). It would be a good quality of life upgrade having better thermals and a useable commander CITV at 10.7 and it could even move up to 11.0 if necessary. This also applies to the Dor Dalet (3D) in the American Tech-Tree. (Report about missing Baz FCS also passed to the developers sometime ago)
3 Likes
And the other 3 IDS need to go from 11.3 to 11.0, especially in SB. All of them are over BRed because “they are fast”
MiG-21Bis and Bis-SAU to 10.7, they have no business being matched up with the likes of the F14 and F16 with their basically useless radars (No pulse doppler or MTI, though this is something that can’t be changed which is why I’m only proposing a change in BR Rating) and no radar missiles (the R-3R is so bad I don’t even consider it as a usable missile, Low lock and launch range and Low maximum G Overload)
2 Likes
Same aircraft, just worse engines than the FGR2/FG1
Not at the moment. Red tops are broken. They barely work. When they get fixed. Maybe. Though only to 8.7. Would be unplayable at 9.0
SRAAMs getting a buff soon. At minimum double the range, maybe also limited all aspect