Yeah i agree, but the top br brackets should move up now it faces tanks with thermal sights, stabilizers, apfsds and composite armor
Im sorry but some of those changes are …^
why does the ozelot goes to 9.7 but strela stays on same br ?
Why does the chieftain’s go up again when they are already helpless ?
Puma to 10.0 ? for real ?
bmp2m should had been 11.3 already but now goes to 10.0 what a joke
And you compare the puma to bmp2m ? bmp2m shits on puma or any other ifv all day long…
1 Like
Its 1 second on ace crew, its not going to change anything except those milisecond hunts in duels which rarely even happen.
Spikes are useless anyway.
Its better than nothing an if they would make them work, it wold be a decent buff
None of these br changes will change anything when the BR range between vehicles in battles is 1.0+/- if the range was reduced to 0.7 +/- half of the balancing issues would disappear overnight and keep ww2, cold war and post in closer groups.
But if not you will get a BR increase of at least 0.7 with no gain in firepower. So be glad that the Puma doesn’t get Spikes.
This
Thats the problem they put it on higher BRs several times, so why it shouldnt have spikes on 10.0 without an new br change?
Here to say the Tornado IDS MGF should go BACK down to 10.7 there is nothing rational about it being.3 Lower than the ADV/F3. While lacking everything that makes those craft even remotely threatening to 11-12.0 BR craft.
The MGFs speed could get it out of a jam at 10.7 in times. That’s impossible at 11.0 due to constantly being around top tier craft and superior missiles.
1 Like
Well, I really hope these changes will not be added to the game
There is no reason to raise the BR of the IS-6. Why would IS-6 stands in the same BR as the Leopard 1? IS–6 doesn’t have HEAT, mobility or armor to justify the same BR as the Leopard 1.
Me too. Non-sense changes…
Except the Leo 1 is going to 8.0. The IS-6 is going to 7.3. They are absolutely not going to share the same BR. If anything, there is now going to be a bigger BR jump from the IS-6 to the Leo 1.
the is 6 is not 7.3 and the leo 1 on 8.0 so theres more distance now between them.
8-9 game out of 10 u play +0.7 or 1.0 br atm
The PUMAs gimick is that it is resistant to HEAT rounds yet it keeps getting moved up in BRs to the point where it only faces APFSDS and still has no ATGMs to compensate, This update is just going to make it even worse off than it already is.
3 Likes
i think 8. is to high for the leo 1. a vehicle with no stabiliser, thermals or apfsds can face now things on 9.0 vcehices wich have at least two of these things.
1 Like
So, my take on this is that there can be no " Decompression " if the max BR is not changed. You can do a small amount of decompression by moving some tanks up and down but by moving EVERYTHING up? What is the logic?(I do understand vehicles that see late WW2 going up but for everything else it doesnt have logic) Just make the max br more than 12.3 for tanks and planes and then try to fix the BR’s that need it most. I kinda feel bad because when I play my TURMS-T I’m going to have to eliminate vehicles I used to not see anymore after the 10.0 change but now I’m going to see them again and they stand absolutely no chance against me. Another example is me using the MiG-23M. I have to wait on the runway to even have a chance to get a kill for my stock grind fighting BVR missiles and 4th Gen Fighters. So to finish off my rant, I dont think these changes should be implemented or at least a change to it.
1 Like
The VFM 5 is very good, it was at 9.3 with it’s cousin the XM8, the XM8 having thermals but a worse round balancing it with the VFM 5 which has the mega round. Now they are putting them both up to 9.7 and helping the XM8 out with a new round but nothing for the vickers?
It was capable of being upgraded with a thermal sight so please add it otherwise it’s jut a worse copy of the XM8…
4 Likes