Ah, another pro-compression post.
Matchmaking from 1.0 to 0.7 is BR compression.
You go from 4 categories of separation between Tiger 2 & Maus to 3, which means everything is screwed.
Analysis & decisions take time. Patience is our friend.
Ah, another pro-compression post.
Matchmaking from 1.0 to 0.7 is BR compression.
You go from 4 categories of separation between Tiger 2 & Maus to 3, which means everything is screwed.
Analysis & decisions take time. Patience is our friend.
I think you should downtier the f1 to 10.0 or give the f1 his historical armament with 9ls gbus and asm
Lol I’m just tired of fighting is6 in tiger 2 and when I get there to the 7.3-7.7 br I don’t want to fight big scaries.
Not sure why you want the F-1 to be 11.0.
You’re dying to IS-2/3/4/6 in Tiger 2 consistently?
Have you considered angling to increase your suvivability a bit?
has there been a recent change to the 122?? ive never been able to frontally pen a super pershing with it and i used it a LOT back in the day
Let the f1 be 10.3 or uptier it to 10.7 and give the armament or just dowtier it
same with the t2 but or let it 9.7 with 2 9ps or put it 9.0
its not the point that the 2s38 is taht much to strong at 10.0, but in a downtier at 9.0 this thing will be the total destruction. As you say the vehicle would perform the same as 11.0, so why they dont move it up? it would be a strong vehicle on this br too, but then it couldnt bully unstabilized vehicles on 9.0. its also no at the same BR as the PUMA wich is kinda ridiculus.
I do and I get shot in turret every time no matter if I angle or not.
Could just be a skill issue on my part.
The most recent change to the penetration of the 122 mm was back when the de Marre calculator was introduced, back in January 2019.
That to say you’ve been kind of speaking out of your ass.
It’s okay, but they continue to unfairly massacre my PUMA
puma we have in game never had mounted spikes so you gotta wait for the other puma
SIMULATOR :
All-aspect missiles should be limited to 10.7+ BR (relevant for later additions)
(DE) F-4F (late) should move 11.0 > 10.7 ; it is effectively the same as the F-4E and F-4EJ which are both 10.7
(UK) F-4J (UK) should move 11.3 > 10.7 ; no significant improvements over other 10.7 Phantoms. In fact basically the same aircraft as 10.7 Phantom FG.1 and Phantom FGR.2
(US) A-10A & A-10A late should move 10.3 to 10.7 / 11.0 ; an aircraft with all-aspect Fox-2 has no business facing aircraft with no countermeasures
(RU) Su-25 & Su-25K ; same
(US) A-6E Tram ; same
(CN) Q-5L should move 10.7 > 10.0 ; no countermeasures and no performance improvements over 10.3 Q-5A. Without missiles it is seriously over BRed at 10.7. 10.0 only because of LGBs
(CN) Q-5A should move 10.3 > 9.7 ; no missiles and barely any performance improvements over 9.3 Q-5 early
(CN) F-104G (CHINA) should move 10.0 > 10.3 ; it is the same aircraft as F-104G (Germany) which is itself 10.3
(CN) F-104A should move 10.0 > 9.7 ; it is basically the same aircraft as 9.7 F-104A (USA)
(UK) Venom FB.4 should move 9.0 > 8.7 / 8.3 ; it is much to slow to perform at 9.0
(SWE) J35D Draken should move 10.7 > 10.3 ; without RWR and FOX-1 is significantly outmatched at 10.7
(US/CN/FRA) F-100A & F-100D should move 9.7 > 9.3 ; lack of maneuvrability or really high speed makes them underperform vs the opposition at 9.7.
(SWE) J32B same
(UK) Hunter F.6 same ; SRAAMs not enough to compensate for the bad maneuvrability
F-86K (Ger, Ita, Fra) should move 9.3 > 9.0 ; performance is on par with 9.0 jets at best.
(SWE) A29B should move 8.3 > 8.0 ; same performance as 8.0 J29A
(SWE) J29F should move 8.7 > 8.3 ; it has bad performance compared to 8.7 jets
(FR) Mystère IVA should move 8.7 > 8.3 ; bad performance compared to current 8.7 jets
(FR) Mystère IIC same
(CN) F-5A (CHINA) should move 9.3 > 9.7 ; currently same br as F-5A (USA) despite having much better missiles
(UK) Sea Vixen FAW mk2 should move 8.3 > 8.7 / 9.0 ; currently too high performance for the BR, and lack of guns isn’t that big a deal in simulator battles.
(ITA) CL.13 Mk.4 should move 9.0 > 8.7 ; performance on par with 8.7 F-86A & F-86F-25
GENERAL
Please consider removing Magic I from Mirage IIIC and adjust BR accordingly (9.7 or 10.0 in all gamemodes)
Please considering removing Magic II (maybe also S.530F) from Mirage F1C and adjust BR accordingly (10.7 or 10.3 in all gamemodes). You can then rename it “Mirage F1C early”
Please consider adding Aim-9L to UK Phantom (either FGR.1 or FG.1) and adjust BR accordingly
Please consider adding Aim-9L to F-4F late and adjust BR accordingly
There is two Morko-Morane.
its the same with the leopard 1 on 8.0 now, if you consider that the t55 am1 is only on 8.7 now with apfsds, now an faster reload and laser rangfinder and much better armor its kinda ridculus
Great, my 9.0 German Grind G91, Leo L/44 and Tam2Ip will now be 9.3 meaning 24/7 games against 2S38, TURMS, SU25K, also meaning possible matchups again M1 Abrams, XM975, T80B etc, great decision…
Russian Prems Untouched again
Turms should be 10.3 at current BR ranges, 10.7 after Update Range, 2S38 should’ve always been 10.7, BMP2M should be 10.3 afer changes, SU25K should be 10.3 so it doesn’t constantly get downtiers against people with no Flairs, etc
Gajin please drop the Tornado IDS MGF back to 10.7…
the thing was perfectly fine around aircraft at that BR and with the F5E being moved there many months ago it would have been balanced out overall.
This by far one of the worst 11.0 vehicles to be in during at 11.3-12.0 MM. it lacks everything the F3 ADV has .3 BR higher. That’s just insane.
With the botting concerns getting addressed I think bombers and attackers can get some attention now.
The PUMA simply have to get spikes now, on 10,0 without missiles, only with an relativly slow firing 30 mm Gun isnt really balanced. #GibSpikeWhen
I definitely agree with most of these changes especially the wolfpack getting M900 and having a br increase due to it having no armor and being hard to maneuver since it’s a wheeled vehicle.
I’m guessing you’re already planning on doing something like this but current 10.0+ vehicles should definitely get a br increase and decompression.
A simple decompression idea (without accounting for air) would be
10, 10.3 move up 0.7 in br becoming 10.7, 11.0, 11.3
10.7’s become 12.0’s (they stay as middle grounds between upper and lower top tier)
11.0, 11.3, 11.7 move up 1.3 in br becoming 12.3, 12.7, 13.0
An important reason for why I suggest this is because I don’t think (using current br’s) 11.3’s should meet 10.3’s and 10.0’s shouldn’t meet 9.3’s or below.