T90 to 11.0 why not as litteraly every other vehicle is getting moved up.
while compared to M1A1 it has better armour better thermals, is way smaller but worse turret traverse worse mobility. So it trades a few things while both have nearly equal firepower. The M1A1 can reload slightly faster if aced and not down on crew while the t90 uses an autoloader
2 Likes
T-90A should stay at 10.7. I bet you havent played it.
M1A1 is far superior than T-90A, with the best hull down tactics, good shell and turret armor.
IS-6 is slow? Play Sho’t Kal Dalet on 8.7 (9.0 after update :( ) and inhale fumes of all other players… I agree that is-6 should be on 7.0 (no lineup on 7.3). I don’t understand why is-6 don’t have is-3 ammuniton - propably after BR update it don’t have it… Prototype of IS-6 is from II WW, but now it is between HEAT-
FS/APDS/APFDS which are deadly for IS-6…
1 Like
and you havent played the M1A1(I havent aswell)
Atleast if the T-90 is staying at 10.7 leave the IPM1 there as a 105 at 11.0 with 522mm pen is really not good
Also move the damn arietes down they dont deserve to be 11.7-11.3 they should really be 11.3-11.0
1 Like
I write about change BR - then it impossible to get fun. Maybe playing like ytubers - one tank + plane and garage… And other players cry becouse one death players…
I want see statistics of sho’'t kal dalet before first change BR and after - for me killing 2 tanks in game is good game now… On one side new lineup is sho’t playing with merkavas which go faster than sho’t forward…
So while the T90 can pen pretty much the M1A1s entire turret
The M1A1 can only go through the breach and roof if its hulldown
1 Like
GAijin should decrease the BR of Maus and E-100 from 7.7 to 7.3 and Increase the BR of T-95 from 7.0 to 7.3. Also lower the BR of the IS-4M and T-10A from 7.7 to 7.3.
I hope I don’t need to comment that the BR of the Object 279 in the 8.7 with armor exceeding over 300mm shouldn’t stay where it is. Increase it to at least 9.0.
1 Like
And the damn missile can’t even be ammoracked!!
Lol, of course Gaijin moved the M1A1/IP to 11.0 while keeping their RU dream-team 11.7 lineup intact. Can’t have anything challenging total RU dominance at top tier can we?
1 Like
No, that would make them even less balanced as their current counters all go up.
In a downtier it would be a nightmare.
Everytime someone copes about the Maus/E100 is over BRed a puppy dies
1 Like
Literally 0 chance to survive?
Both those planes carry like over 200 flares and can periodically dump them for half the match and be untouchable by missiles. And if a conventional jet tries to engage them, theyll be nice and slow and easy for someone else to kill. You want to talk about 0 chance to survive, how aboht half the planes from BR 9.0-10.0 that dont have countermeasures and just die when an aim9l is launched at them. Making like 3 planes have worse matchups is nothing compared to making like 30 planes unplayable.
Strike aircraft arent supposed to be air superiority aircraft and arent supposed to be able to outplay almost everything by pressing 2 buttons.
I’ve mentioned this before but these are some br changes that I desperately want to see implemented in air realistic battles.
B-29 to 6.7-6.3 range.
6.0 has been a ghost BR for a while now because of the JU-288 spam and how there are no bombers on the allied side to counter the spam. It’s not fun for both sides because 9/10 times it’s a 6 vs 6 and there’s 4 ju288s with 2 fighters having to fight 6 allied fighters. Being an allied fighter chasing a JU-288 is NOT FUN. Being a german fighter having to fight 6 fighters practically by yourself is NOT FUN. If the B-29 was put at a lower bar I believe it would counter the spam so that there are an equal number of bombers on both sides. This would then encourage people to play at that bar again.
Both the F-84B and F-89B/D raised to 7.3.
I love the F-84 as much as the next person but when it was moved to 7.0 it had me scratching my head. It is leagues faster than any other starter jet and has great energy retention and yet it’s at 7.0? That makes no sense. Same thing with the F-89B/D it has a freaking after burner for crying out loud. Not to mention the F-89B has a terrific armament of 6 20mm.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
5 Likes
Actually I would love to see a BR decrease, IS-7 down to 8.0 and Object 279 down to 8.3. Not sure if this would mitigate the ATGM situation and Cold War/Modern Era mixing.
Breda 501 its BR in realistic battles must be lowered to BR 4.0 just make a comparison with “8.8 cm Flak 37 Sfl.” it is a vehicle similar to the Breda 501, but its penetration is 153mm, while the Breda 501 only 145mm.
Not to mention that it lacks the crew, the Breda 501 is not even the real Breda 501 on a historical level.
It had 8 crew members not 5, this vehicle is already easy to be destroyed by tank or fighter machine guns, it does not deserve to stand at BR 4.7.
.png.6aca7d804761e3cf34a85a64b712a158.png){kind=link}
Drones need to change. Scouting does not, some of us, not everyone tries to use it to scout specific targets who are far away even to where many will not notice them. Ex: Those who engage from a long distance away. There is no strategy to that except charge toward the enemy.
Since a translator for Chat hasn’t been implemented as of yet, so communicating with teammates is very unlikely since A they have it disabled or B do not speak your language. So “Attention to the grind zone/map” is also likely ignored as well.
I agree, 7.0 for Thunderjet is nonsense. Especially if you want to fight them with your ultra slow 7.3 Schwalbe. I don´t want to even mention what is it like playing in me 262 against 8.3 americans. Unplayable…
5 Likes
The vehicle is on wheels. Your trying to compare its gun, not its performance.
Look at the Puma Armored Cars as an example.
Their fast, and because of that speed they’re very very potent.
Yes, the gun isn’t amazing in terms of reloading and penetration and the vehicle being open top but its speed makes it very capable. It should be 4.3 not 4.7 but I digress.
all of my change suggestions I hope will make superprop battles become fun again. no more one sided bomber spam and no seeing f84s/89s in a 6.0 super prop would be a good start.
2 Likes
I’m concerned for the AA capabilitys of my line up. Currently I play ussr at 8.3 with an 8.0 vehicle as AA and by moving up tanks to 8.7 its going to make the AA less usefull against higher br aircrafts. Currently It gets the job done mostly but already struggles against smart players and uptiers as well as being useless as anything but AA … all this is ok though. But now I’m not so Shure especially becouse the gap to the next AA is still 2 steps higher. It would be bad choice to jump .3 br up just for an AA and even worse a double jump but what is a 8.0 shooty boy gonna do against a 9.7 jet or heli. And for what i’ve seen other nation may have the same issue as the AA br is usually the same.
For a suggestion I can think of a few but none sound very good. keeping the Strela at 9 or even lowering It to 8.7 is what sound better but still I’m not shure about the cons on that as I’m dont play planes myself, maybe it will need some nerfing of Strela or buffing 8.0 AA? Maybe it can work as temprary while the same changes are apply to air brs? IDK but that is my concern
1 Like