I still don’t understand how that thing didn’t move down immediately after the butchering.
1 Like
Air RB:
Mirage 4000: 13.0 > 12.7
8 Likes
The issue is it’s basically a fairing containing the guidance electronics, at most you’re getting sgt york tank effectiveness, probably worse
Vehicle: F-15A “Baz”
Gamemode: Air Realistic Battles
BR Change: 12.7 (Same as proposed)
Suggested Change: Remove the Aim-9M. If the Aim-9M is kept, keep it at 13.0, no Aim-9M carrying F-15 should be below 13.0.
Reason: Historically Israel didn’t get Aim-9Ms until the 2000s, the F-15A Baz used Python 3s and Aim-9Ls exclusively until the Baz Meshupar program. It’s loadout should reflect this ingame. Israel also lacks any 12.7 aircraft with SARH radar guided missiles, this could solve this.
2 Likes
Ground RB:
EBR 1951: 5.3 → 4.3
6 Likes
how did it get even slower from the T26E1-1 (also there’s no dashes In American tanks as a general rule)
1 Like
AMX-13 (FL11) 4.3 → 3.3
This thing is worse than the 3.7 M24 in literally EVERY WAY.
This is legit nothing but skill tax clownery.
This tank belongs at 3.3, not 4.3.
3 Likes
Air RB:
- SO 4050 Vautour II B : 9.0 → 8.7
- Move down to rank 5
5 Likes
Air RB:
- SO 4050 Vautour II A : 9.0 → 8.7
- Move down to rank 5
6 Likes
I doubt at which BR I’d like to see Tu-4. At 7.0 it will face a lot of enemies, that can just run away forever. On the other hand, Tu-4 has very strong armament and it can be problematic for players at 5.7. I decided to ask for 6.7 to see, how it’ll play in best conditions and then it can go up after decompression.
Vehicle: Type 81 C
BR: 11.7 → 11.3
Mode: GRB
Reason: It is simply not good enough for 11.7, you dont have the range to launch vs competent CAS player shooting AGMs, you cant shoot down the AGMs, on non flat maps you dont have the reaction speed vs low flying heils/planes.
4 Likes
i get them being the same br is dumb but fun fact the ud is peforming worse by a significant margin
ud imo could be moved to 11.0 with 3bm46 and mabye thermals
Falcon was just a one unit prototype. It was never equipped with something different with than training rounds. It never saw service and was cancelled. Its loadout and the belt composition is just theoretical, the rounds were aviable for that gun…thats all.
GRB:
SA.342M Gazelle
9.7 → 9.3 OR Add historically accurate RWR
At its current BR of 9.7, the SA.342M Gazelle lacking a Radar Warning Receiver makes it exceptionally vulnerable. It has a low count of weaponry and countermeasures, making its situational awareness weakness easy to exploit. 9.3 with out its historically accurate RWR would leave it still vulnerable do the surplus of radar, 4-kilometer range SPAA at the BR range, but without it being helpless
6 Likes
What’s wrong with the J-10C at 14.3 if the Rafale, AESA-Eurofighter and Su-30SM2 are being moved up to 14.7?
1 Like
T32E1 have very great armor and good round if you know where to aim but a reload buff will help it like 12S for ace would a nice change even in irl the reload rate is right
because gajin use reload time as balance factor sometimes i could be wrong
as example the 105 tiger went from 15s to 12.5s ace
Vehicle: Jagdtiger
Ground realistic
6.7->7.0
The same reason as obj.268
too OP in 6.7
1 Like
How so lol. What good is it in air rb.
In sim its relegated to a ship hunter / bomber but dies as soon as anything sees it.
T58 hasnt moved once. Nor has the Turm III, but for some reason the Object 140 was moved up despite it being less-or-equal to the Turm 3 in terms of capability. So why havent either of these tanks been moved?
1 Like
i prefer kpz70 over them due to better mobility and gunhandling i consider these generally speaking equal
dm33 of most 9.3s can also ufp the t72 and t64 relatively consistantly
1 Like