I don´t like the new nerf on the Falcon and Amx 30 DCA. If the vehicle was carrying the ammunition, it seems unfair to take it away. A change of BR is preferable.
Bad moments…
3 Likes
Vehicle: IPM1
Gamemode: GRB
Position change: Folder after M1
Reason: With it being a direct upgrade to the M1, it should be placed after it, and due to not getting a more powerful gun, nor should it get full research cost, also currently being foldered after a vehicle with a higher be than it is silly.
Only the US ADATS has a gun, Britain’s doesnt.
Also what’s the ability for it to sometiimes kill tanks have to do with anything? In that regard its weaker than most 9.X ATGM vehicles. if that is the performance metric that matters, move the ADATS down to 9.3
1 Like
Ground RB:
Leclerc MSC: 11.0 > 10.7
5 Likes
that it can defend itself, and sure the adats should also move down to 11.7 probably but i was just suggesting the ItO
also the adats arleady is 11.7
AirRB
Mirage 2k- S5 12.7- 12.3 Only gets extra CMs over the 2k- S4 which is 12.3
See f-16 NETZ mod with double the amount of CMs than the NETZ yet same BR!
At least be consistent
2 Likes
Remember when the Stormer’s SACLOS could kill tanks since people thought it was a solid penetrator?
Kinda my point when compared to the IT0 in the only thing that actually matters as an SPAA
Vehicle: ItPsV Leopard
Gamemode: Realistic
Vehicle change: remove APDS belt with no BR change
Reason
Anti airs do not need apds. They are supposed to target planes and they have plenty of penetration with the AP belts. Fighting tanks should not be their primary role.
AirRB
Spitfire MK22 is the same BR as the MK24??
MK22 6.7- 6.3
3 Likes
Ground RB:
AMX-32 : 9.7 > 9.3
5 Likes
Yeah, I dont know what they’ve changed, but the starstreaks dont seem to do much vs light tanks at the moment
Ground RB:
Char 25 t : 8.0 > 7.7
2 Likes
13.3? no they are 13.0 in air rb
so you get 2km less range and a lot better close range firepower, how is that not about equal
compared to ito vs pantsir 8km less range less missles and no guns
Here are my suggestions for changes to Ground Realistic Battles
M109Gs 6.3 → 6.7 Right now the only difference between these and the M109A1s is a small amount of weight, otherwise these vehicles are effectively identical and should not be at separate BRs.
SIDAM 25 8.3 → 8.0 This vehicle is nowhere near a peer of other 8.3 AAs such as the Gepard, and is much closer to the M163 which sits at 7.3(!) With such small APDS belts and no AP rounds of any kind in the main belts, the SIDAM 25 has very little capability to defend itself against ground vehicles. In addition to that it has no radar, and the distance it can lock onto aircraft is very limited as is the ammo supply. This makes it ineffective against helicopters armed with ATGMs. There are also only 2 other vehicles in the Italian tree at 8.3, and both of them are mediocre ATGM carriers, while there is a much better lineup at 8.0. Moving it down to 8.0 would be a good start and truthfully it could even go to 7.7.
R2Y2 8.0 → 7.3 These jets are rather inept at their current tier especially with MiG-15s and F-86s at 8.0 now. A BR of 7.3 would also make it useful for CAS.
3 Likes
Ground RB:
AMX-50 (TO90/930)
AMX-32 (120) 9.7 → 9.3
It’s incredibly slow with absolutely 0 armor to show against anything that isn’t a 25mm/30mm autocannon.
It’s firepower is also incredibly mediocre for 9.7, heavily lagging behind most 9.3 MBT’s which break the 400mm+ barrier of KE penetration.
This tank was perfectly fine at 9.3 where it 100% belongs.
7 Likes
GRB :
VAB Mephisto : 8.7 → 9.0
Change : Add HOT-3 atgm
7 Likes
9.7 for the T72 would be fine.
2 Likes