Merkava has -8 at max, which is barely any better. Its armor is paper. Even if you have a shitty reverse gear, the T-72’s armor is incredible.
I know, because I genuinely love the T-72B3.
Edit: How was this reported for being abusive…?
1 Like
Gaijin:
“Due to popular support, we have gone ahead with the F-15 going down in BR”
7 Likes
You know the absolute worst thing is that I know youre joking, but I can see it happening this way.
Yeah close to that, only the M1A2 seems a bit low in that screenshot.
But yeah the SEPs are in a weird place since they are only minor upgrades over the base M1A2 in game.
Yup. Like 2S38 moving up as been one of the most heavily requested changes consistantly in the past few years. Usually 200+ likes, only now happening.
Tonkas getting right BRs, consistantly very well upvoted. never happens.
I honestly dont think they care about this thread and its just for show
Still the same BR than Guepard who perfom better in all aspects :
as Anti-air, better radar, dommages, better at range.
35mm APHE is superior to the 30mm one in ground to ground (pen + better to kill russian tanks in cupola).
Guepard have stabilisation (30DCA not).
So move Falcon → 7.7, AMX30DCA → 8.0, guepard still to → 8.3.
or move them all 0.3br if that’s too broken.
Gaijin does that a lot, nerfs tanks based on the playerbase (which most often are crying level 20 premium players who know nothing about this game). They also buff/nerf tanks based on k/D’s, which is not even close to an ideal way to balance stuff. Prime example is the mbt2000: it was arguably a worse ztz99-II/III since it was less consistent to play (sometimes it could tank shells, other times not, sometimes you’d be faster than enemies, sometimes not), but because people who wanted to play china usually has good k/D’s, they nerfed to 11.3 and later to, 11.7.
I already farm with 4.7 russia because of how undertiered it is. getting a 4.3 tank at 2.7 because of german mains would beat my 20 kill record
Yeah… but alas
Spoiler
3 Likes
this guy acting like the yenisei is op and deserves the same BR as the gepard despite being worse in every single aspect, also movign all T-34s because… they are too op???
continue to read
over the last two days ive decided to properly play USSR, their armour is incredibly good for a medium even by 5.7 and im nailing 60+% winrates
their “weakspots” on the small turret T34s are too small to be fair for 3.0 tanks to do much against, mobile as all hell and the angle pen on russian APHE is absurdist
2 Likes
moving 35mm spaas up wont fix anything, youre taking their purpose away-aka being an anti air, at that point they have to fight planes that have better weaponry that can render the range useless+what would the point of having that when you have better alternatives at that exact BR, i.e the us would have an overclutter of 9.0 AAs, for germany you’d have a straight up better gepard with missiles at less than a bracket away, for south africa the uk it would be silly to have a very similar vehicle (offensively) twice at the same br, japan would be silly because at .3 higher br you’d get a vehicle that can kill planes way more easily, still not fixing the point of the oerlikons, which is how easy they can kill tanks no matter the BR, even top tier tanks can be easaily melted by them, so no matter how high you move them it wont change their ability to kill tanks, it would only affect their chance to kill planes-hell you would even be making the anti tank spaa situaion worse by forcing them to fight tanks instead of planes, and many of these nations dont really have a 9.0 lineup so you’d have to take them to places like 9.3 where the effect would be even worse since they are now forced to fight things such as A7s, some phantoms, IIRC some soviet planes with KH-29Ts, jaguars, Q5s, super etenards, AJ37s adn the evil israeli super skyhawk. all these planes can easily outrange the average effective 35mm firing range… once again forcing them to target ground targest mostly, probably even worsening the current situation
Oh I love the British, they’re very OP tanks, clearly they all need nerfs, and to also go up in br.
Don’t even need to aim. I just sip my tea and the tank auto kills, with their heat seeking ATGM-BC-DS
T-34s are vey easy to kill actually, all variants especially the early turret one, you can even kill them frontally with most medium caliber autocannons (bofors, flak 36) and pretty much every cannon can go thru the cheeks, dont get me started on german guns which cut thru the ufp like nothing, unless you hit the mg or driver port (which also screws up shots on almost every tank thanks to volumetrics), and for the late T-34s (85/STP/100) you most likely have enough experience on how to kill them and count with guns good enough to lolpen in most places
1 Like
As I expected, the Beglit is too powerful for 9.7, I was out preforming most of the team with ease.
The only problem I encountered was my team leaving in the first couple minutes, just like USA teams.
The tank is too good for the 9.7 br, and the only thing that holds it back is literally blueberries.
It is? I was in the M1 and shot its LFP, drivers port, and even the flat side, and none of them did any level of damage, let alone kill it.
ive shot abrams turret rings, sides and lfps and done no damage, same has happened when i fight T-72s, 64s and 80s, thats just a problem in spall calculation, any tank can make no spall, and trust me by experience nato tanks really love to eat shells like nothing
they are from the 1970s but face ww2-korea generation aircraft. Stupidly unfair
we have three 10.3 SPAAs, two 8.3 spaas, two 5.3 spaas two 4.0 spaas. that is normal
im also for SPAA losing AP shells. and if you miss shots on planes with the lead indicators its a skill issue because youre shooting to far away or have bad aim, its not hard to hit targets with a lead indicator as i do it all the time in the stormer AD against supersonics.
lineups should not affect vehicle BR. putting a thing up or down to fill a gap is bad balancing.
I probably should add i think most CAS planes should be increased in BR, especially super-transonic ones with guided A2G in fairness to this concern.