MiG-29 forgotten again as it dies in 12.7 against the (massively) overperforming F-15A FM and 4 9M’s and 7M’s (as it sits with no R-73’s)
8 Likes
the problem is when 5 f-14s fire 6 missles each is real hard to tell what is going where
ARB:
Mirage 4000 : 13.0 ->12.7
Reason : hardly playable in uptiers, do not have fox-3. It should step down 0.3 BR like the F-15s did
6 Likes
Ok and??? I’m talking about SB, why are you talking about RB??? Did you read my original message HELLO?
the su 27 and su33 are also just overall better than the mig 29G in the german tree.
Same with the Smt and the premium Su 30 variants.
The lack of AAM is hiting the mig 29s in game real hard imo
Vehicle: Roma, Littorio
Gamemode: Naval
Balance change without BR change: Reduce reload time to 36-30s
Reason: This two ships are the least competitive among the 8.3 battleships in their damage potential, a reload speed buff is needed, specially since its unhistorical such a low reload speed with the information provided on previous bug reports that got conveniently rejected after being forwarded to devs
12 Likes
MiG-29 found dead in back alley shot by F-15’s, he was already dead before the F-15’s arrived.
5 Likes
it can go to 12.5s ace due to gun
1 Like
I dont personally know enough about the mig 29s or high tier russian stuff to balance them other than the SU30 premiums are busted OP.
Ill make a “other peoples requests” addition for people that reply to me as im first comment so more likely to be read
put it to 12.3?
MiG-25
11.0 → 11.7
Reason: so that F-15’s can now face it like IRL?
2 Likes
(Naval) RN Roma 8.3 > 8.7 - the worst high tier battleship at the moment because of too long reloading time for the main caliber - 45 seconds aced (uses basically the worst practical value, while its competitors can have theoretical). Reloading time should be lowered at least to 30 seconds aced and if needed with a change of BR. Same for its sistership RN Italia.
4 Likes
thats just a poor reason
Joke
3 Likes
What plane are you even referring to that can’t detect it?
1 Like
you dont wanna know how stupid ppl are here on avarage
So, now that F-15A/J/Baz are downgraded to 12.7 it would be fair that MiG-29A (9-13) gets its R-73 and R-27R/T.
Because now we got more planes with AIM-9M which is a very strong IRCCM missiles for mid ranges and is one of the strongest against flares and to some people AAM-3 is the best IRCCM missiles.
So, first was the F-16A OCU which had 6xAIM-9M at 12.7 and now are the F-15s. IT WOULD BE FAIR THAT THE MiG-29A (9-13) GETS ITS HISTORICAL PAYLOAD!!!
2 Likes
You’re forgetting one was induction ETC
1 Like
Vehicle: Shenyang F-5
BR Change: 9.3 → 9.0
Reason: The Shenyang is effectively a MiG-17PF/Lim-5P with 2 R-3S missiles. These missiles do not greatly change the combat effectiveness of vehicles at the BR, and yet the Shenyang sits 0.7 BR above its counterparts.
4 Likes
Leopard 2A4M/ Seiran Maidens
Ground Realistic
12.0 → 12.3, add DM53
Reasoning:
Put bluntly, there is currently no reason to buy Leopard 2A4M.
For new players, 12.0 is extremely odd BR which offers no other vehicles that the premium 2A4Ms. There is nothing to build lineup with. On top of that, it has neither the T-80U-E1 armor nor M1A1HC Cliclbaits shell, making it the least appealing choice of the three premium 12.0 tanks.
For veterans, there is literally nothing 2A4M can offer them, that isnt covered by Leopard 2PL, a free squadron tank.
Despite all of this, it is clearly better than 11.7 tanks, so it wouldnt make sense to move it down in BR; moreso moving it down to 11.7 does not solve the lineup issues whatsoever.
Thus I propose adding DM53 shell and moving it to 12.3, making it a premium counterpart to Leopard 2PL, while offering new players who buy it chance to build lineup that does not drastically vary in effectivness.
13.0 when