Same ammo with T34-85 KV85, BR356A is the beat ammo for 85mm gun.
T34 85 players also choose BR356A but not BR356K.
Are you backseat gamer?
It’s not about lacking enough power to penetrate an M4, it’s about being able to instantly delete someone without even needing to penetrate their armor with HE against the M36.
Solid shot/APDS users will understand how HE overpressure one shot deletions are a great help. It usually takes a couple of shots to an M4’s turret with the QF 17pdr to kill them. Only takes one hit of HE to kill a M36. No RNG, no volumetric, no crew eating entire shells and not dying. Just hit=dead. That’s a huge help for something like the Black Prince.
M36 is fine where it is. It’s there to put holes in Jpanthers frontally, because the 76 HVAP is worthless. Giving up a stabilizer, immunity to HE and reload rate is worth the tradeoff. You clearly haven’t played against the infinite Panther and King Tiger spam with an M4(76) or M36.
1 Like
exacto en 279 no debe seguir en 8.7
1 Like
Oh! Now is not anymore about the “superior range” of the Vikhr, eh? YAH-64 gets thermals (also good zoom), the best RWR in-game and quite decent FM; it’s balanced at 11.0 along with the Ka-50 (funnily enough, both are prototypes).
Ka-50 performs better doing heli rushes (thanks to the flying without tail BS), but that’s where its advantages come to an end. Dying to a Vikhr in an Apache is a skill issue given the Ka-50 lack of thermals and Vikhr unmanoeuvrability at long range after the SACLOS/ATGMs nerf.
The Apaches aren’t are bus like the Mi-4, you can dogde Roland-like missiles in them.
1 Like
When will they upload the br to object 279? It is ridiculous that this tank continues to see vehicles of 7.7 and more, taking into account that the majority that gives it face are going up from br to 8.0 or 8.3, the 279 is quietly a tank for 9.0 or 9.3, because they keep the ozelot at 9.7? Most nations have their first anti-aircraft missiles in 9.3, not to mention that the German 9.3 squad now does not have anti-aircraft. If it is because of the number of missiles that the Ozelot carries, then they can lower the Gepard to 9.3. The change to the Type87 seems unnecessary to me. Already 9.0 without a stabilizer is too much suffering and the m26 in general at 6.7? It’s crazy, that 90mm is terrible against higher range vehicles.
2 Likes
This absolutely should be their top priority for air at the moment. 8-ish to 10-ish is absolute cancer. A horrible mess of technological gaps of comedy level, with tech ranging from shit Sabres to all aspect doom wagons. It’s a farce and I frankly can’t be assed playing that BR at all.
2 Likes
As a Japan player , i don’t see suitable the Type 87 RCV at 9.0 , its ammo can barely penetrates top tiers tanks (of course, that depends on what area you shoot at the tank, whether on the side or behind the turret), it the ammo gets more penetration and if the vehicle get stabilizer , MAYBE would be reasonable… but if that Type 87 get to that BR , the Type 89 has to climb BR aswell and with all those nerfs that vehicle received i don’t see it suitable too … that damn BMP-2 hasn’t been nerfed and has features that the Type 89 has long time ago before that stupid nerf :/
I don’t has problems with those vehicle , since i play with them even going on top tier and they hit hard if used correctly , if the Type 89 gets it old glorious functions , would be great , its kinda sad that slow autoloader charging and those horrible missiles control , even the ammo penetration was nerfed
6 Likes
when i read it i didnt actually see the type 89 change which seems quite excesive considering gaijins history with it and the nerfs
2 Likes
ur undoing the br decompression that was done in the last BR change. Stupid idea.
Tiger, Panther, and IS-2 changes are dumb and unreasonable. Meanwhile, Obj 279 faces 7.7 vehicles that can’t kill it even with HEAT-FS. I tried it with the French 90mm HEAT-FS and shot the turret ammo thrice…it was yellow. ATGM killed the Obj in the end not the 4-5 tanks shooting at it. It grossly steamrolls downtiers in which most tanks helplessly run from that OP P2W monstrosity
1 Like
They did decompress sub 5.7 however. Rightly or wrongly not all vehicles shifted.
So why is the type 69G, a worse t-55AM, now going to be higher than it in br?
5 Likes
Just to clarify, the M36 is ineffective against “the infinite Panther and King Tiger spam” because “it takes several 17pndr shots to kill an M4” and the M36’s best strength is only “putting holes in panthers”? You seem to be contradicting yourself.
Agree to disagree I suppose, but in 95% of circumstances I’ll take the M36 over the M4A3 (76).
1 Like
The K50 has better maneuverability than the Apache, the Vikhr are much faster than the AGMs on the Apache in the game, it has twice the survivability, it has much more powerful unguided rockets, it is able to precisely shoot other helicopters and planes with its cannon from a long distance, it is 100% precise when it comes to Vikhr for shooting down enemy helicopters or planes, it is able to take off much faster than other helicopters, which gives it a very big advantage at the very beginning of the game, its durability and the ability to fly unlimitedly without a tail while you get a message about killing it is already sufficiently OP, Vikhr is able to reach the enemy, and in this case AA vehicles, much faster than AGM on Apache.
2 Likes
From my experience that power to weight ratio difference isn’t really that useable in many scenarios and the higher weight makes it slower to stop. Sure, it can climb some steep hills and rush some distant points, but when trying to flank or peek, I find it to be easier with M19 thanks to that gun depression, lower weight and reverse speed.
Smaller silhouette… M42 is shorter and taller than M19, I don’t think there is any advantage to that.
Turret placement for peeking is actually better on M19 as it is placed at the very end of the hull, so peeking doesnt expose as much of the hull.
And they have identical ammunition…
To me, they simply don’t differ that much to warrant that 0.3 difference.
Sure M42 is not helpless at 4.3, but it doesn’t matter as its going to be played in much higher BR lineups now that 4.7 lineup won’t exist anymore.
And nobody is going to up their 4.0 lineup to 4.3 just to include M42 in it.
T 72 (Turms) está muito inferior aos Leopard, os Centurion 7.7, estão muito ausente do jogo por estarem em um Br alto para a qualidade dos tanques, Magach 1 e 2 são mais 2 tanques que se tornam inferiores nesse br.
The M42 also only has 4 gears distributed among that 72 km/h top speed, compared to 8 gears and 56 km/h for the M19.
That kills the acceleration advantage quiet a bit because there’s just not enough gears to cover the very large range of speeds that the M42 can travel at.
Also the M42 has slightly less gun depression, for some reason.
No, the M36 is the best weapon for the infinite spam. It puts holes in panthers.
The tradeoff is vulnerability to overpressure and fighters looking for easy strafe kills. M4(76) requires anti armor weaponry to defeat, M36 does not. 17 pdr deals with the M36 using HE more easily than it does an M4 with AP.
M36 doesn’t need to go up because it isn’t so strong to be used as an all purpose vehicle objectively superior to the other options. Capturing points is better done with an M4, due to artillery spam and CAS strafes. Defending caps from distance is better done with an M36.
1 Like
Don’t forget to change the BR of both the Object 279 and IS-7. They are slaughtering us. If you think it is fair and balanced for them to wipe us out during events you are clearly insane.
2 Likes
Don’t forget the IS-7 which may as well be a slightly easier to kill, slightly lower br 279
1 Like
Because it is not Russian and has more skilled players playing it
Gaijin stopped developing their game and uses an algorithm to dictate balancing
Any vehicle can be any BR irrelevant of its features / historical context as long as the players of said vehicle are bad enough or good enough