Some of these changes seem really weird, i understand that they may be WIP but uptiering vehicles like the M26 and having the Super Pershing at the same BR shouldn’t even be considered. (same with other vehicles like the Tiger II)
Now with some specific changed i would personally love to see in the game;
Naval Realistic Battles:
Shimakaze 5.0 → 4.7 The ship is comparable to other Japanese destroyers at 4.3 while boasting better speed, AA suite and ready torpedoes (while other ships have a higher total torpedo ammount), performance wise this ship is inferior to even some 4.7 and 5.0 Destroyers other nations have but i think 4.7 would be sufficent for it.
Agano 5.3 → 5.0 poor firepower in general, while the HE bug persisted it was somewhat viable but since the bug has been (thankfully) fixed they ship feels terrible and is suck into 6.0 and 6.3 more than it should. It also haves poor AA suite and armour 5.0 BR would make things better for it.
Bourrasque 3.7 → 3.3 It’s more comparable to other nations’ 3.3 Destroyers.
Ground Realistic Battles:
Ground vehicles:
ZTZ88B 8.7 → 8.7 The 88B is just an inferior version of the ZTZ88A, they were already at the same BR but with most of the Chinese 8.7 lineup being uptiered this vehicle could use being at the same BR it is right now.
M60A3 TTS (China) 9.0 → 8.7 This vehicle is too an inferior version of an existing vehicle this time just even worse, while the TTS in the American TT haves a better round and ERA installed the RoC TTS haves none of the latter being it’s only advantage being ~1 ton lighter. While RoC TTS didn’t had any sort of ERA installed the Republic of China had full access to the M774 APDSFS round and it should be added if the BR were to be keep as it is now.
M41D 8.0 → 7.7 Comparable vehicle to the ZTS63, while having thermals it haves worse overall mobility. if thermals are a issue for it to be moved down then an approach similar to the one taken with the ZTZ59D1 would be an option, remove thermals and make the vehicle 7.7.
CM-25 8.3 → 8.3 (Add TOW-2s to it) It’s supposed to be a better version of the M113 TOW carrier already in the TT but TOW-2Bs fail to be better at killing enemy vehicles (they work at disabling their breaches pretty well tho) BR can stay as it is but add TOW-2s to it (or TOW-2As while it doesn’t affect the vehicle’s BR).
ZTZ93 9.3 → 9.7 Probably one of the best 9.3 MBTs in the game and outshades other stuff in it’s own TT like the CM-11.
ZTZ96A & MBT-2000 10.0 → 10.3 Same reasons as above but on a vehicles with a very good protection on the turret and UFP, 9.0s have problems facing them. ZTZ96A(P) should stay where it is.
PGZ09 8.3 → 8.7 Gepard style SPAA that is beter in every regard to Gepard and even other vehicles like the Type 87 SPAA, it was a step higher before and should be now.
Type 89 & Type 87 RCV 8.7 → 8.7 both vehicles been victim of countless (albeit historical in majority) nerfs, both should have no bussiness at 9.0 specially Type 87 RCV where the superior Italian equivalent sits currently at.
Type 16 FPS 9.0 → 9.7 Give it the Type 93 APDSFS round and let it sit at the same BR where the production Type 16 is at, Type 16 (P) already fills the niche of a prototype vehicle with a worse round and is worse overall then the FPS.
Type 93 9.3 → 9.0 While the missile changes helped the vehicle a lot this vehicle is at the same BR as the Strela-10M2 while having a worse missile, yes it’s the fastest ground vehicle in the game but this ain’t a race it’s supposed to be a balanced game.
M42 Contraaereo 3.3 → 3.3 Worse chassis than the Wirbelwind, less ammo and protection. While having belt fed guns is a plus the vehicle is overall worse.
Centauro I 105 (ROMOR) 9.3 → 9.3 Keep it at the same BR, it shouldn’t be on the level of other wheeled TDs like the Type 16 and VRCC, everything this vehicle can do is already done better by the Spanish Centauro, it’s slugginess is comparable to the ZLT11 while having a much worse round.
Merkava Mk.2D 9.7 → 9.3 Only difference from the other TT Merkavas is a rather usless composite package and a mine protection kit, when it used to be 9.3 the vehicle was already comparable to tanks in 9.0 with DM33 equivalents, there was no reason to raise it’s BR in the first place after giving the other Merkavas a better round.
Merkava Mk.4(s) 11.3 → 11.3 & 11.7 → 11.7 For the love of God model the armour correctly.
Helicopters:
Z-9 10.0 → 9.3 lackluster payload, lack of a chin gun and only 2 hardpoints, it’s only use at this BR is being a flying SAM with the TY-90s, They should be REMOVED from the Z-9 and let this terrible helicopter be at least mediocre on it’s original BR of 9.3
Z-9WA 10.3 → 10.0 This helicopter would be the same BR as the AH-64DJP and higher than stuff like the A-129/T-129 and G-LYNX. Same issues as the one listed above but with more TY-90s and terrible ATGMs (for the BR it’s placed at) solution would be rather simple, just add a SP cost as a balancing factor to the TY-90s or limit them to only one pylon, this helicopter is only used for anti air duties and it’ll only get worse the more it’s uptiered.
Z-19, Z-19E 11.3 → 11.0 suffers from the same fate as the other PRC helicopters; bad rockets, light payload, deadly air-to-air missiles and lack of a chin gun but this time with slower AGM-114Ks with a longer range which weren’t affected by the Hellfire’s guidance improvements. Same solution as before just balance TY-90s, not the mediocre helicopters carrying them.
Z-10 11.7 → 11.3 or 11.0 It’s just a fat Z-19 with a (pea shooter) chin gun and even longer ATGM range which as with the AKD-09 haves atrocious guidance. This helicopter isn’t a top tier helicopter that should be the same BR as things like Ka-52, Mi-28NM, Apache Longbow or UHT Tiger (which haves F&F missiles to keep up) implementation of better armament should be considered or just let it sit at the BR of the Z-19.