If your gonna nerf all the helis you should nerf the most op one the KA50 that heli needs to go up in br if any heli goes up should be the KA50!
2 Likes
You just need to get some practice with the guns and learn how to lead them. It isn’t the most difficult thing to aim (considering I have played the AJ37). The better jets is a good thing as they should be a counter to how good the SK60B is at ground pounding and even ground pounding SPAAs. This is supposed to be balancing it for a reason dude.
“Oh cool theyre finally fixing the f1c BR- wtf.”
How is this thing 11.3 again? It’s awful lol, can’t turn with anything, can’t really outrun anything anymore since it fights teams of mig 29’s and F-16’s. It gets 2 magic 2’s and that’s basically it for useful weapons other then the cannons, otherwise it has slow ass 15G IR missiles and the radar missiles will always go for chaff so are basically useless against anyone with a brain stem and chaff equipped. MLD massacres this thing in every way apart from maybe top speed? But it probably out accelerate it so- And that’s thing’s at it’s BR, that it will already lose against 9 times out of 10, I wish I only had to fight MLD’s, but instead its mig 29 and f-16c.
If the increase the SU-11 then sure move the sk60 up aswell but untill then -_--/- yeah the aj guns are sick but that plane can actually put them on target due to its flight performance lol
The Chinese tech tree F104G needs some help. No flares at 10.7 is a disgrace…Gaijin please…
Either lower its br or give it flares just like the German’s and Italy‘s F104G
2 Likes
The SU-11 is pretty good too, but we’re talking about the SK60B and only it. SU-11 might be worthy of 7.7 but the SK60B is definitely worth 7.3.
So if the helicopters are being raised in BR because of the range of the missiles, where are the KA series helicopters? The Vikhrs missiles have the same range as the Hellfires, but the KA-50 stays at 11.0 while the AH-64 moves up to 11.3 while being a less effective helicopter? Why the discrepancy?
4 Likes
The VT is not let down by vertical guidance, its for use against helis, and for that, the vertical guidance works just fine.
APHE is pretty much obsolete at that BR, most tanks are immune to it from the front, so you wouldn’t use it as a main round anyway, and the dart is more than enough to oneshot with a well placed shot. No need to load an APHE for a sideshot, especially since you’d have to shoot once first anyway to empty the breach, and even if that doesnt kill, a dart is enough for the second shot (or you have severe skill issue).
Other MBTs also struggle against lower pen guns frontally, like the OF-40s, Chieftains anywhere below the turret, AMX-30s and -32s, XM-1… Not to forget that the Leo 1s are in three different techtrees by now. The Sherman armour comparison doesn’t hold up because there is no plethora of autocannons at its tier like every IFV and gun SPAA has in high tier. they are VERY common and a random spray killing you frontally is a big detriment.
Tams are not better than ZTZ88s, but I do agree with moving it up to 9.0 because they’re basically just slightly smaller, less armoured but engine-in-front Leopard 1A1s. And the Tam 2C should go to 9.3 bc of its addon armor and DM33.
The M60A3 has absolutely awful mobility compared to the ZTZ88s, at a higher BR. the thing about ZTZ88s armour is that they combine it with being almost as mobile as a Leopard (while being almost as armoured as a M60A3, if you are stubborn about that).
even on mixed urban/open maps it’s not that easy to hit the flat part of the turret at mid ranges on a moving tank. And the APDS that alot of 8.0-8.3 tanks still shoot, without LRFs, struggles with the turret when not at short range with the tank standing still. At 8.7-9.0 LRFs are still rather rare and usually come with a downside (like no stab on AMX-30s for example).
Please do not remove the Shrapnel shells. Just make them not the starter round I like having fun with them.
3 Likes
if you are not illiterate you can see i said not enough, 10.7 should be a good BR for Swedish Mi-28.
I disagree there is no 10.7 tanks to pair it with and as such it would have to be uptiered to 11.0 or you uptier your 10.3 tanks to 10.7.
As for the AAs 3 nations have access to the roland and I guarentee you 99% of the time atleast one of those nations will be facing the mi-28
Wow
Most of this changes are horrible
2 Likes
What is the reasoning behind the T92 going up a rating?
Also, why does the VIDAR, which has been proven effective in fighting up to top tier, only have a .3 BR increase instead of jumping to 8.7 or 9.0?
4 Likes
They literally have thicker turrets. Type 59/69 have 200mm turret front, ZTZ88s have 220mm. Plus the hull addon armor that the 59/69 don’t get.
try both out, you really notice the 3 tons less weight and a bit more HP and topspeed compared to the T55AMD, which also has a much worse dart, and alot worse turret traverse (15°/s aced on the T55AMD, 20°/s on the ZTZ88s), and even the vertical traverse is a bit worse.
Don’t get me wrong, I like my T55AMD alot too, but the APS is niche and the dart feels awful in an uptier, especially since Germany, Sweden AND Italy now have T72M1s at 9.3, which the ZTZ88s don’t struggle with. And the extra mobility oomph and better gun handling feels really nice too.
1 Like
Merkava MK.3B and Merkava MK.3C and Merkava MK.3D move those tanks back to 10.7 they dont have armor or mobility to face top-tier MBTs. T-90A, ZTZ99-II and III are 10.7, merkavas should have stayed 10.7 too.
3 Likes
I disagree with the 279 being moved up right now, as it would be a complete joke in an uptier and viable in a down tier. When the 9.0-10.0 BR range is more decompressed to where it doesn’t have to fight Thermal MBTs on the regular, then yeah it can go up. However I completely agree with the KV-220 going up, it is going to be way to strong, at 5.7 with very few things stopping it.
Why are there people celebrating that Tiger E is now going to face T95s, IS-3s, T-44-100s and M46s? Does ANYONE actually, genuinely think that this is fair and balanced?
3 Likes
So moving them back to the BRs they were at like about almost 4 years ago iirc.
How about repair location of tiger 1 ammoracs, how somebody cane take from second ammorack in front of tank? If somebody see plans of tiger after box with propably machinegun ammo is steel plate, but isn’t that plate in game model… ok i understand changes br but after buying some premium tanks you can’t do good lineup. Samua is perfect example. Next is china ztz69 iig 9.0 how it can make good lineup… and do something with israel shot kal and Magachs they are often awfull on that BR. Especially premium one wchich have wrong armor statistics but feel that it can less damage that gimmel. Thermals are awfull, mobility and survivality is sad on 9.0… And something is wrong with speed of afdsfs they are slower than statistics. How about 6.7 most of time playing against 7.7? I heard that you want that II WW don’t fight with rocket vehicles…
Tigers and Panthers were by far the most undertiered tanks in the game. The German Big cats can handle 4 of the 3 on that list.