Yup, a tank that the M26 can never penetrate still sits in 6.0. Dont forget that the PanzerIV/V also stays at 5.7.
3 Likes
Then how are people winning significantly more than 50% with all of them where they are now?
The M4A3 provides a massive boost in mobility.
1 Like
Yeah i don’t really think it should move to 9.7 too
it would be like a Mig-21S (R-13-300) but better
1 Like
M4A2 is a 4.0 using a 75. T-14 is premium as is T-55E1.
And a SPAA is available at 5.0 as well.
SK60 is decent at dogfighting (although it’s not great at it), but the SK60B is an incredible ground attacker.
2 bullpups (which none of the SPAA can do anything about), and then a good amount of rockets than can lead to getting two additional kills on top of that. SK60B should honestly go to 7.3.
SAAB 105G is a pretty good dogfighter for 8.3, and again, pretty good at ground-pounding. Maybe not worthy of 8.7 but still a really good for 8.3.
It really doesn’t. No reason for a .7 br separation.
No? The sk60 can only carry 2 bull pups or 12 rockets?
It cant carry both, I havent experienced it in air but considering the SU 9 is at 7.0 the SK60 can stay there
Gen 3 thermals, 9kg tnt HE, LRF. All these features could face 10.0+ … It’s so dumb to let it annihilate WW2 tanks xd
The IS-6 is still pretty broken at 7.3 (although not as broken as it used to be at 7.0)
The Object 279 always had been at 8.7, and it’s even more broken now that a lot of 7.3s (and 7.7s / 8.0s) had been moved up so now the Obj 279 can face them. It really should go to 9.0.
1 Like
It should go up in br no doubt but 9.3/9.7 come on…….
8.3 will be fine considering there is the chinese spg with a stab and a dart and LR at 8.7
US doesn’t have a 5.0 SPAA
2 Likes
You clearly haven’t played it enough because now they have customizable loadouts and now can carry both.
1 Like
500 horsepower compared to 410. On a flat road the M4A3 reaches 40 km/h in 11 to 12 seconds compared to the M4A2 doing that in 16 seconds. Even the T-34-85 performs the same task in 13 seconds.
All this in realistic.
Also to point out that the BR difference between the M4A3 and M4A2 is 0.4, not 0.7. In fact in arcade they are both 5.3.
1 Like
What did the British SPAAs do wrong? They’re solidly mid, not bad but not that strong by any means, yet regularly seem to move up, especially compared to things like the Ostwind and Wirbelwind. The bosvark is an unwieldy, vulnerable bus and I don’t think I’ve seen it in battle more than twice since they were added.
1 Like
Also are we gonna ignore that the American F84F is at rank V and gets an airspawn but every other nation’s F84F is at rank VI at the same BR, loadout options, etc. but doesnt get an airspawn?
Gaijin please be consistent
1 Like
Where is the IS-7? Where is the Obj 279? If I recall correctly neither were uptiered last BR changes despite everything around them going up to decompress 6.x. Now those 5.x and 6.x vehicles are moving up, reversing the benefit of moving up everything above them, and making the Obj 279 and IS-7 have even EASIER opponents to kill.
Both the IS-7 and Obj 279 need to go up a minimum of 2 BR steps. They’re absolutely busted in their current BR ranges and the only reason they don’t regularly dominate is because of their rarity.
4 Likes
Well the Comet has APDS that can still pen it plus it’s a QF gun and on top of that I’ve played the D-5T many times and have had no problems going against the Tiger ll not like the pen of the D-5T changes anyways when you go to the Zis-S so and like I said I’ve played American 5.3 which is worse off since they have one 5.3 and it’s the A2 76
But the T-55s also have APHE which the 88s lack as well as missiles and heat which while the 88s have the heat and VT which the VT is let down by bad vertical guidance so it’s not a huge deal as you are making it out to be the other two removes the flexibility the T-55s have as well the AM-1 armor is miles better than the 88s. The 88s armor help it against lower stuff to a degree but that goes for any mbt that isn’t a leopard 1 that’s like saying a shermans armor helps it against 2.7 tanks but struggles against 4.7s like sure it helps it in a downtier but that’s it. Against anything higher it struggles in most cases unless the other person doesn’t know how to aim.
Against auto cannons is useful but pretty much every other tank can do that which it isn’t anything special. I have no idea what you even mean with the turret being “angled” it is entirely flat on the front baring the corners which if you aim to those corners than that IS a bad shot. It is very easy to pen on the turret since it’s 220mm max which really doesn’t help at that br range.
If it is a DM23 equivalent than move up the Tam than since it also has DM23 and is better than the 88s on average.
Against the baseline M60 sure but the A3 is better on the angles as well the crew is much more spread out so it is much harder to one shot where the 88s have the issue like all 55s that being the crew packed together.
“don’t tell me you’re looking at 0° pen at a BR where no tank has flat armor at the front except for tiny spots on the turret” I don’t but the angle pen also isn’t everything those “tiny weak spots” aren’t as small as you are making them out here. on most tanks even more so with a laser range finder they are very easy to aim at since most maps don’t allow for much sniping to begin with since most maps are brawling heavens.
The MiG-21 SPS-K has no place below 10.0. It’s a supersonic with two R-60s, highly manoeuvrable and fast, and you want it to fight 8.7 with 30G missiles!? That’s an absolutely terrible idea. Just. No. Can we please start moving supersonics and high G missiles out of 9.x, not into it, because that BR range is a horror show even after the Su-25 and A-10 went up. On that note, move the MiG-19, MiG-21F/PFM, Lightning, and F-104A/C all up a BR step as well. They have no place at 9.3 fighting 8.3s.
1 Like