Ah fair enough
France
Leclerc, Leclerc S2 RB 12.0 → 11.7
Leclerc AZUR, Leclerc SXXI → New APFSDS Add
Makes sense since it does have a lot of ground attack weapons.
I can finally play the khalid premium(no thermals…) without getting constant uptiers to the 10.3 premium spam which is excellent.
Air RB, F8U-2 10.0 > 10.3. The vehicle just does everything. Good flares, good missiles, great turn/roll rate, great guns. The only downside is I’m pretty sure it is slower than other supersonics.
my msitake, in fact 8.0 would be enough - which I changed
Now this abomination is 7.0 which makes no sense
Air Realistic Battles, AMX A-1A. 11.3 > 10.7. The plane is ridiculously over-tiered for what it offers. It is simply a side-grade if not a downgrade compared to the tech tree AMX which sits at 10.7.
The guns are worse than the tech tree AMX with less ammo and are harder to use.
While the missiles pull more overload compared to the AIM-9L, they have inherently less range and that fact is only amplified by the subsonic platform. The MAA-1 missiles also have a wide FOV which makes it very susceptible to be decoyed by flares even in rear aspect. I would take the AIM-9L over this missile any day of the week.
The guided armament options are very limited compared to the tech tree AMX and the targeting pod offers very similar performance.
There is nothing that makes the AMX A-1A worthy of a 11.3 BR and it is simply a side grade if not a downgrade compared to the tech tree AMX which sits at 10.7.
Please reduce the battle rating of this plane to 10.7 and make it a worthy premium to purchase.
100% support this, no reason to play the M26 when the T26E5 exists.
You might wanna correct yak-141 in your comment btw.
F-104G (Italy) ARB 11.0 → 10.3
It have even less missiles than chinese and japanese counterparts, but have flares instead
Are the ARB changes also being applied to simulator mode? Don’t see any changes there. For example, the F16ADF should be moved down to 12.7 in sim due to the lack of IRCCM and 2 radar missiles less (compared to the F15A).
RB, Lepord2/PSO. 11.7>11.3. Reasoning: The Leopard 2A5’s armor and auxiliary equipment are completely inadequate for top-tier combat intensity
Vehicle: T-80U(USSR)
Gamemode: Ground RB
BR Change: 11.3 ----> 11.3(no change)
Reason: with more DM53 added to the game, T-80U’s armor is less reliable. And It’s mobility is still slightly worse than its opponents. It’s elevating and traversing mechanism is significantly worse than its opponents.
I wouldn’t say T-80UE1 should be 11.3, now that it is indeed better than T-80U. I’m wondering if Swedish T-80U should remain 11.0.
Air Realistic Battles, F-14B: 12.7=12.7 (Without changes)
They should leave it as is. With the new BR, it won’t even be able to reach the altitude needed to launch Phoenix missiles, especially since it’s easier to evade them.
According to the rules, only one vehicle per BR, but it’s worth noting that the F-14A (IRAF) is better armed than the B version, except for the AIM-9L.
If they do change the BR of the F-14B, they should at least add AIM-9M. It’s ridiculous how the for exemple Su-27 with at least 4 R-73s will tear it apart.
DM53 is worse than CL3143 imo, sure you get a bit more pen but the spalling is noticably worse
Leopard 2a6 is fine
Challenger 2: CR2, CR2(DL2F), CR2TES, CR2BN, CR2E: Main gun ROF buffed to 15/m first order(4 seconds)
Currently the CR2s stands no chance against contemporary 11.7/12.0s with their inferior penetration, protection and mobility.
A major buff to their firepower, restoring their edge of being able to disperse shots rapidly should be considered.
100% agree, UE-1 has better aiming characteristics and good thermals. Should be slightly higher BR
Please: Kfir Canard 11.3 > 11.0
Reasons:
It doesnt have a J-Band RWR, which makes it really hard to play at 11.7+ where you face a lot of MiG-23´s which are basically able to shoot you from big distances without you being able to notice incoming missiles.
It is basically a faster Nesher with flares, I dont see what reasons a 1.3 BR difference.
9.3 would be a good start. SRAAM are still very powerful when used correctly. But 9.7 is waaaay too high.
The merkava Mk4M should stay at 11.7 because the only thing that makes it different is just an APS. The MK.4 are all struggeling at their br but this one even more. It is gigantic slow and has ok firepower
Merkava Mk.4M 11.7>11.7