ARB, F-104S and TAF 11.3 > 11.3, give AIM-9P-4s from F-5 FCU, because its not the fastest thing around, and all aspect missiles should be added long time ago
FGR2/FG1 also have a better RWR and 30 more CMs over the F4JUK(UK) as well as the better engines.
All 3 British phantoms need to go down to 11.7. they simply don’t have the loadout or flight performance to cope with dealing with 13.0s or even really 12.7s.
(4x 9Gs and 4x Skyflash DFs with a rather bad PD radar these days. Gun only via gunpod)
Even compared to other F4s like the F4S they are totally outmatched. Something like the AMX should be able to deal with them without much issue if played right, but a subsonic attacker shouldn’t really be compared to a supersonic interceptor
2 Likes
Gaijin… Move top tier air to 14.0… please
2 Likes
I think it’s awesome where it is. But hey if you want I won’t stop you from suggesting a BR lowering. (Also screw that “Italy suffers” guy) but I think since it’s top speed is 660MPH-ish 4 missiles (dogwater) and 4 really good cannons and decent maneuvebility makes it worthwhile in its BR. Single-handedly my FAVORITE British jet to dogfight with.
Just every single time I’ve tried to play it. It’s just faced a wall of 9.0/9.3s and no matter what I try. I can’t seem to outrun or out fight most of the 8.0/8.3s like the F86
Also for me, I rarely jet the javelin above 500kt which is roughly 500mph so how the hell are you going faster than something like the sea vixen
I’ve gotten 2 aces with it (5 kill games)
Anyways man, I’m going to catch some ZZZs it’s late. Make sure to check that PM I sent you.
Ground realistic battle, Pantsir S-1, 11.7->12.0
I did understand that we need to decompress the BR of the ground battle and I would like to welcome it to expand into 12.0. However, in that case, the BR of the SPAA should also decompress, too. Pantsir is one of the good example, since it was known that 10.7 aircraft such as A10 and A6E already had struggle to deal with pantsir, decompressing its BR will be helpful for 10.7 line ups.
8 Likes
Ground needs more than just a .3 BR increase, it should go to at least 12.7 because you guys never decompress it.
3 Likes
arbitrary rules dont matter and gaijin doesnt follow any arbitrary rules to a T regardless
yeah saying screw me doesnt change the fact its not worth downtiering because compression is bad by default.
1 of the phantoms (not the junk) should get 9Ls and remain 12.0
1 Like
Ground realistic battles, VT-4A1, 11.7 > 11.3.
Out of Chinese top tier vehicles (which all need either remodeling or BR decrease) the VT4A1 is the most worst off. It stands no chance against the likes of Leopard 2A7 or T-90M, but is even worse than ZTZ99A or WZ1001. It has very weak armour paired with worse mobility and maneuverability than other Chinese top-tier tanks. Also, the classic Gaijin-given traits of Chinese top tier: horrible penetration of 577mm, and the worst reload speed of 7.1 seconds.
This tank has NO redeeming qualities that justify it being moved up in BR.
98 Likes
It comes down to the speed of those jets is better. The A10C is just a sitting duck to anyone that knows how to play. Once spotted you can maneuver away before it can get close enough to use its missile. Maybe the su25sm3 could drop down in br tho. I don’t see a lot of those being played. Maybe that’s why.
Also take into consideration a jet moving at 600kph on the deck is going to limit the speed and distance the missile can travel compared to on the something like the gr7 at 1100kph.
And the f104J shouldn’t be at that br. That jet sucks without flare since it cant really out maneuver and aim9e.
Gaijin expand max BR higher 13.7 for fighter aircraft top tier in the january 2025. my guess
But might increase to 14.3 becuase 14.0 not enough
In an ideal world
All Gamemodes, TAM 2C, 10.0 > 10.3, FASTER RELOAD
Either keep it at 10.0 or make the reload faster (7.7s → 6.9) with fully upgraded crew and place it at 10.3 as planned…
The tam 2c is a light vehicle with not much to speak of armour and has a 7.7 second full crew reload, which is pretty slow when compared to the likes of others T72s, T90s, All chinese vehicles have 7.1 second reload, And then there are t80s with 6.5s reload…
A very similiar vehicle is the swedish premium cv90105. It has a 5s reload. Everything else is the same except it does not have dm 63 and fires dm33. That should not be the difference between a 5s reload and a 7.7 second reload.
1 Like
That is absurd. Look at the Ozelot at 9.7. It hasn’t even a gun. What to you complaining about? Also the LAV-AD hasn’t a radar.
Air Realistic, Mirage 2000D-R1. 12.3 > 12.0.
This is just a strike aircraft with 2 short range air-air missiles. It is placed at same battle rating as Mirage 2000C-S5/4 which carry two more BVR missiles. This does not make sense. It doesn’t even have inbuilt gun and the gun pod placement makes aiming awkward and affects flight performance. It should be reduced to 12.0 where planes like F-4S, Tornado F.3 have more missiles and BVR capabilities but compensate with flight performance.
6 Likes