You should ping the devs to see this. After all the agreement (also from my side) this should get some attention from them. I which you the most luck
2 Likes
And R-27ER+R-60M is ahistorical. It’s so painful seeing such ahistorical things.
1 Like
Well, it’s this gentleman’s usual behavior. just ignore it. He lives on barking at everything nice and shiny.
@GhostSoph Hello hello? Here’s a post with suggestions that many players agree with. I really hope you guys could pay attention to it.
Add something here that I want to say about it.
We already have Mig-21 Bison at 12.3 equipped with 2 R-73 and HMD. As far as I know it’s radar is better than N-019. That means, if Mig-29A really receives R-73 and have its R-27ER removed, it shall have better chassis in exchange for worse radar, and 2 more R-73 for 0.3 battle rating. I think this is fair enough, now that missiles with IRCCM perform worse than before (and we already have Mig-29G at 13.0 and that’s 4 R-73 for 0.3 battle rating compared to current Mig-29A). R-27ER+R-60M is ahistorical anyway. Well, this should make more sense if the F-16As go to 12.7.
He is a community helper with no connection to the devs, even if you were to ping someone with connection to the devs it won’t do anything for you.
Well, I have to admit that I haven’t really learnt about how to use this forum… So, who should I contact?
You could try to contact someone who is directly employed by gaijin. The community helpers are volunteers.
Also don’t do it in a thread do it in PMs
Thanks.
1 Like
Are you saying the MiG-29A should get R-73?
Maybe they could make the MiG-29S (9-13S) that’s BR 13.0 and equipped
with the R-73, R-73E, R-27ER, and with x192 Countermeasures.
1 Like
The MiG-29S has up to 192 flares? Damn thats a lot.
get R-73, and remove R-27ER. then it will become historical
5 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WCphmoi43iyc
Here’s issue. Please, everyone. Support this.
5 Likes
With the BR changes coming up now is the time to bring this up
1 Like
With the Flanker at 13.0, we need this more than ever + the FM correction
5 Likes
They are not completely historically accurate ???
1 Like
This bouta be an event aircraft watch
Don’t even bother, he just likes to disagree
1 Like
2 Likes