I see.
With autoloaders that have small first-stage ammunition rack, I tend to hang around capture points more often to replenish them quickly.
And on another note, I don’t really see anybody play the T-54s anymore :/
Indeed they’ve all moved to the T-55 which is even more a pain in the ash
At least the T-55A is at 8.3, am I right? xD
Something like that so that mean it’ll be the most common ennemy that you face. And let’s not even talk about all the other T-55 with composite armour and ATGM firing guns
1 Like
what you just said afterwards, that the Skyflash is actually a terrible missile. He was claiming that the 7Ms are “still good” but the standard is set so high with the 27ERs that anything reasonably below them is directly not in the league. And my point afterwards was that 7Ms are not the worst SARH out there and i completely understand it, thats why i brought the Skyflash on the table to compare it, but regardless it is still an average missile with mediocre tracking that hinders the F-15s BVR capabilites.
1 Like
The cupola shots look like the best way to deal with them (for M82 APHE).
Such a shame they wont actually fix any of the bug reports for it. The SuperTEMP could actually be half-decent. No where near as good as the R-27ER as it has normal speeds. But its current state is actually kinda appauling.
Even earlier version the DF (which are somehow a top-tier SARH at the moment) are insanely unreliable. Ive had so many just… miss
1 Like
Yeah, it is quite redundant if you have top tier air for France already, but it’s quite nice to have it if you don’t have any of the Mirage 2000s.
If they do, in fact, keep it at 11.7 though, it would honestly be pretty good for its BR.
1 Like
I am back to request that the 10.0-10.7 jets without flares to be bumped down at least 0.3 BR. Even in a downtier, planes like the F-4C, Mirage IIIC, F-104J/G, SU-17 are just missile bait. In ARB, as soon as you appear on someone’s UI, they entire enemy team will gravitate towards you because they know you are a free missile kill if they have something better than an R-3S. It’s a meme.
I would especially like to see the F-4C moved to 9.7 so it can see fewer all-aspect missiles in ARB. Won’t matter for GRB since there are powerful SAMs at 9.3-9.7 that will cancel it anyway.
Let the flareless supersonic jets be the glass cannons they deserve to be.
The stela would be fine at 10.0 or 10.3 but 10.7 is too high. It lacks any form of NVD (including thermals) and any search radar. The missile is good but the platform just isn’t. Flying low or really high can make it extremely hard for the strela to kill you so use that to your advantage.
Don’t move the Doom Turtle. It doesn’t need nerfed, and you’ll kill the lineup for it.
1 Like
Disagree with the Tempest, it’s an excellent aircraft for both ARB and GRB. It’s a lot better than the Tempest V IME and better than the F4Us and F8Fs around the same BR.
Can you also tell them not to nerf the T95? It doesn’t deserve it. It’s barely used, severely lacking in mobility and flexibility, and simply doesn’t have a reason to fight 8.3 tanks.
2 Likes
Make 2S6 11.0 Now it’s has 32G missile and have Radar
3 Likes
And thermals, guns, more range, IR tracking etc.
It’s so much better than the Rolands
1 Like
If Mirage2000-5f’s BR is increased to 12.3 and the number of missiles is not historical, then there is no valid reason to make that adjustment.
1 Like
Strela should go to 10.0 if the japanese one goes to 11.0. At 10.0, Strela can still outperform other SPAAs such as ASRAD-R and the Israeli Chaparral.
1 Like
We would need MICA’s, 'cause those were the only ones that could be carried on the centre pylons as far as missiles go. The 530D and the 550 II couldn’t be carried in the centre.
1 Like
With the nerf to the M735 shell, vehicles need to be adjusted accordingly for the vehicles that rely on it.
For example the Type 16, Type 16 P and Type 16 FPS are all lackluster and overtiered vehicles that could be reduced by .3.
The Type 16 is in no mans land at 9.7 with nothing to make a lineup with.
Type 16 P and FPS can be lowered to 9.0 now that their shell is nerfed heavily.
Type 74 G never deserved to be 9.3 in the first place.
4 Likes
Normal Type 16 has Type 93 APFSDS but all of them should be adjusted, including american vehicles that only have M735
1 Like