Where is F-5C to 10.7 or flares removed and 10.3 and F-15s to 12.7? ASA still 11.3 suffering lol, why the poor Baguettes go face 9.0 stab tanks with APFSDS when they have barely 200 mm pen point blank.
3 Likes
Because the ML/M has SPO 10 radar receiver. MLD has SPO 15. We all known in SB these systems really matters. I can’t see phantoms PD lock with the SPO10,but will do with the 15
1 Like
The answer is simple - cuz US mains bad lol
Strela needs to move to 10.0 RB. It outperforms numerous other SPAAs, even when played at 10.3. The missiles are more effective than both Stinger carriers and Rolands that sit at 10.3, and can be seen often in gameplay.
I like the progress on the SB rotations. Would like to see some further revisions on superprop to jet transition BRs, though. I feel there should be a 7.3 hard cap on what 6.7 can face. 7.7 jets are too much for them.
Along with that, I’ll maintain my cry that the A7M1 (NK9H) and A7M2 need to go up in SB to 5.3. No matter how well you try to energy fight them, or even in comparable turnfighters, they decimate everything the instant you decide to fight them.
4 Likes
Its still a help for Ground, as whoever bring 12.7 jet will see players with 11.7 tanks, potentially making 11.3 a new relief zone?
1 Like
Can you guys just adjust all 4th gen fighters? 12.3 for the F16A/ADF and for the Mig29’s would sound fun,but some planes at 11.0 would be good again
1 Like
I strongly oppose raising the BR of type81(c). He can almost certainly shoot down a plane within 6km when it is clear and bright. If you look at this alone, it would be reasonable to go with 11.0. However, it will not be possible to lock on to a helicopter unless the helicopter ascends or approaches within 3km. In addition, when visibility is poor and it is dark, it becomes difficult for even large aircraft to lock on to targets more than 3km away. This is significantly inferior to other countries’ SAMs of 10.3 and 10.7. Therefore, I oppose the increase in BR of Type81(c).
1 Like
Seriously, the Sagittario 2 moving up? No afterburners, no countermeasures, no missiles … Already struggles at 9.0 it needs to go to 8.7 not 9.3.
5 Likes
Why massacre the 7.7 french lineup? Now you are almost guaranteed to see stabilizers, apds and heat. Are you saying that the TO-55 is to be at the same BR as the AMX 50-90?
Also j6k1 at 6.7 when you have better super props at lower BRs. Same goes for the A6m5 ko.
The AGS should receive m900 if it goes so high or leave it where it is.
11 Likes
Radar is an upgrade sure, but lets be real here. The issue with the 530d isnt the radar that its paired with, its the missile itself, so sure its a better radar but its effect is not that importent.
More CM’s is good sure, but having twice the missiles does not offset that. 90+ is enough when just running flares.
Why are you suddenly bringing up two different planes then the mirage 4k and 2k5f?
Not to mention you are the one thinking the plane with double the missiles is worse then the one with slighty better radar and countermessures? so you would be the one thinking the M2KC is better then the F14A, not me. Id personally take the F14A over the M2KC any day, just like id take the M4K over the M2K5F.
you know the f5 on full heat has a smaller heat signature then a harrier in game right
3 Likes
I think 7.7 is fine for SOMUA SM and AMX-50. They have no APDS, no HEAT, and no high-performance electronics, making it difficult to fight 9.0 vehicles.
5 Likes
These are the worst BR changes I’ve ever seen proposed in this game, and I’ve played since like 2015. The only good thing I see is the max BR for planes going to 12.7, though it can go higher still. Even that is done wrong since the F-15 isn’t even going up, how is that possible? Also why on Earth do the Mirage 2000s deserve to go up? They’ve only got 4 missiles, the 5F at least gets 4 good ones, but not good enough to be 12.3 for gods sake. Not to mention uptiering France 7.7 to 8.0, I mean what is that? When does it stop Gaijin? 9.0 before the end of the year? For the love of all things holy, just scrap this whole slate of BR changes before these ever see the light of day.
5 Likes
You guys really need to revise your formula, this blind trust in your objectively crappy way to calculate things has been proven to be flawed for over 10 years, yet you still balance the entire game around it.
Minor nations are endlessly getting screwed because you fail to account for the lower popularity, lower player numbers and a more demanding level of skill required from the players, which inevitably results in a playerbase that is above average, which further increases vehicle BRs and further increases the skill of the playerbase as only those are able to manage playing with all the handicaps, and the cycle continues.
The fact you continue to repeat this cycle month after month, year after year despite the community repeatedly informing you of this shows me that your transparancy and communication are entirely fabricated and not genuine, and only happens when it’s convenient and you feel like you can get some good PR out of it.
22 Likes
Seriously, what does gaijin have against the french??? Now fighting darts and fully stabilized enemies most of the time because 8.0 gives you constant uptiers while at the same time the bat-chat still only has 209mm of penetration??? Why exactly is a tank like that at 8.0?
you know that harrier is using 4 exhausts in mid body while F-5 only 2 at the rear-end extremity?
that the cross section of the jet flow is lower because of that right?
hate the british
Why char25t → 8.0? Obj906 performance surpasses char
3 Likes
Stop looking at the goddamn statistics already and change BRs according to vehicle capabilities. I can understand the AMX M4 going to 7.0, but not the 7.7 line-up to 8.0 nor the A6M5 Ko to 5.3.
The French 7.7 line-up, while being one of the best, is literally limited by the fact they use solid shots for the most part. Those things are definitely strong, but late cold war tanks have the benefit of stabs, firepower (penning capability) and armor against those kind of threats. Mobility and their great reloads are the only things that equalizes them at 7.7. Putting them to 8.0 will just make them face opponents that are only not better in reload, making them an objectively worse choice. The AMX-30, I can agree with as it’s pretty much a Leopard 1 equivalent, but not with the rest.
The A6M5 Ko literally requires a BR decrease instead of an increase. Now the A6M5 Ko will not only have an even harder time against good players, it will now face the P-51H that will wipe the floor with it with ease (totally not a broken plane that deserves to be atleast 6.7 if not 7.0 even). I do think the Zeros are capable planes, but good players definitely know how to avoid them properly and it’s mainly bad players that never bother learning just what kinda plane they face then make dumb mistakes against it.
5 Likes
It doesn’t have an afterburner. You really think that a low-bypass turbofan has a higher heat signature than an afterburning turbojet?
2 Likes