M60A3 TTS (China)
This vehicle has a DIRECT counterpart in the US tree, even sporting the same name and BR (9.0). The issue lays in the Chinese version being objectively worse! It doesn’t have M774 as its top ammunition, being forced to use the nerfed M735, while having 260mm of penetration APDS as its stock round instead of the 400mm pen HEAT-FS. One issue, though not as critical, the US version also is outfitted with ERA protection, which the chinese version also doesn’t get. Please add the M774 to it and consider putting the ERA as an add-on armor modification.
ZTS63 7.7 → 7.3 or reload from 7,5s to 6s
The Swedish IKV-91 fulfills practically the same role of a fast, LRF equipped HEAT-FS slinger at the same BR. The IKV has better damage (90mm vs 85mm), better penetration (400mm vs 300mm), better reload (6s vs 7,5s), double the gun depression, better optics and 2,5 TIMES better horizontal aiming speed. To add insult to injury its hull also turns faster and has better reverse speed while having practically the same armor and HP/t. What does ZTS have over it? An HMG.
Even if the capability difference somehow isn’t enough for a 0.3 BR gap, then clearly that reload needs to be improved.
M113A1 (TOW), China, Italy, Israel 8.3 → 8.0
These vehicles currently sport the same BR as full fledged IFVs like the Bradley, Warrior and also the M901 which features double shot capability and thermals. The capability difference is just unnecesarily large, especially against autocannon carries that also have better optics, armor and mobility.
MiG29smt at 12.7 but MiG29G still at 12.3 while the weapons are the same but the MiG29G has a better flight model, are you ok gaijin?
Another thing, keeping f15s at 12.3 is ok because i think they’ll add a “late” version but with aim120 but then why not keeping the Su27 at 12.3 and adding a late version as well with r77?
huh,… F-16A Block 10 being 13.0 and Mirage 2000-5F should be at least 13.3 (and will go up to 13.7 when Magic-2 would recieves the 50G short ranges // MICA appears in game)
Why exactly is the british Mustang Mk1A being moved to 3.7 but not the US Mustang?
Also questioning why the Mustang Mk1A is being moved up if the P51C is at 3.7. P51C has noticably better performance, the only thing its worse at is firepower which shouldnt be an excuse with the performance difference. The P51C could easily be 4.0.
Where is F-5C to 10.7 or flares removed and 10.3 and F-15s to 12.7? ASA still 11.3 suffering lol, why the poor Baguettes go face 9.0 stab tanks with APFSDS when they have barely 200 mm pen point blank.
Because the ML/M has SPO 10 radar receiver. MLD has SPO 15. We all known in SB these systems really matters. I can’t see phantoms PD lock with the SPO10,but will do with the 15
Strela needs to move to 10.0 RB. It outperforms numerous other SPAAs, even when played at 10.3. The missiles are more effective than both Stinger carriers and Rolands that sit at 10.3, and can be seen often in gameplay.
I like the progress on the SB rotations. Would like to see some further revisions on superprop to jet transition BRs, though. I feel there should be a 7.3 hard cap on what 6.7 can face. 7.7 jets are too much for them.
Along with that, I’ll maintain my cry that the A7M1 (NK9H) and A7M2 need to go up in SB to 5.3. No matter how well you try to energy fight them, or even in comparable turnfighters, they decimate everything the instant you decide to fight them.
I strongly oppose raising the BR of type81(c). He can almost certainly shoot down a plane within 6km when it is clear and bright. If you look at this alone, it would be reasonable to go with 11.0. However, it will not be possible to lock on to a helicopter unless the helicopter ascends or approaches within 3km. In addition, when visibility is poor and it is dark, it becomes difficult for even large aircraft to lock on to targets more than 3km away. This is significantly inferior to other countries’ SAMs of 10.3 and 10.7. Therefore, I oppose the increase in BR of Type81(c).
Why massacre the 7.7 french lineup? Now you are almost guaranteed to see stabilizers, apds and heat. Are you saying that the TO-55 is to be at the same BR as the AMX 50-90?
Also j6k1 at 6.7 when you have better super props at lower BRs. Same goes for the A6m5 ko.
The AGS should receive m900 if it goes so high or leave it where it is.
Radar is an upgrade sure, but lets be real here. The issue with the 530d isnt the radar that its paired with, its the missile itself, so sure its a better radar but its effect is not that importent.
More CM’s is good sure, but having twice the missiles does not offset that. 90+ is enough when just running flares.
Why are you suddenly bringing up two different planes then the mirage 4k and 2k5f?
Not to mention you are the one thinking the plane with double the missiles is worse then the one with slighty better radar and countermessures? so you would be the one thinking the M2KC is better then the F14A, not me. Id personally take the F14A over the M2KC any day, just like id take the M4K over the M2K5F.