In a pencil that could only go straight and has no BVR capabilities lol. Plus there are a plethera of all-aspect capable supersonic fighters at a lower BR, although they tends to be much slower.
eh i will believe Wareta, one of the main techmods that handles the french stuff more here then one random article. What you posted is the only article i saw abolut that france actualy wanting to use Shard yet
Nah, no argument you say will make it make sense to be the same BR as the same exact jet you just came from but worse.
Mica. Derbys are okay in a dogfight, but loft like mad
1 Like
Compression is bad.
Why would this share a BR with the F-4C?
If you are flying in a straight line anywhere NEAR 12.7+ you are playing bad. Not a Farkour being OP issue, actually a skill issue. At 12.7+ you should be aware of AMRAAMS and play accordingly.
L O L
NOOO you dont say??
1 Like
If they are being changed in RB what will they be like in sim ??? i need to know,
None of this matters because its current BR is what it is BECAUSE IT HAS 9Ls.
Giving 9Ms would be an automatic 12.7 tiering…
It’s almost like the issue is the massive IRCCM leap.
Air RB, F-20A TigerShark, 12.7 > 12.3.
This aircraft has and always will be a budget F-16 ADF (that’s literally the whole history behind it, it was meant as a budget alternative for the same program), yet it sits at the same BR as the F-16 ADF ingame while being noticeably worse in almost every regard. If it wants to use 2 sparrows, its needs to sacrifice 4 of its Aim-9Ls, and it has inferior flight performance compared to the F-16s sat at this BR. It also has less countermeasures (yes I’m aware they’re single-pop, meaning more drops, but that isn’t useful for ARH missiles or IRCCM IR AAMs. It should sit at the same (new) BR as that of the F-16A. The fact it’s still the same BR as the ADF should be a crime… it’s absurd, please fix it. Disregard that it’s a premium, and as such its stats will likely be significantly lower than that of other aircraft. Please take notice of the aircraft’s capabilities compared to others ingame, and don’t just look at the statistics you have gathered please use common sense…
3 Likes
Air RB, T-2(Japan), 9.7 > 9.3.
The T-2 only gets only 2 missiles and has no countermeasures at all.
It can see A10s with 4 AIM-9 L Missiles and Phantoms with AIM-7s.
Bombing is not viable because AV-8Cs are way faster on takeoff.
Same goes for the F-1
1 Like
I don’t think the Fakours are as OP as you think now that everyone knows how to avoid them. And you didn’t answer my question about how you think the IRIAF will do against AMRAAM spam.
1 Like
and the other 95% of the time, you are notified far before.
What planes at 12.7-13.0 CAN’T complete a 90 degree turn in 5 seconds while dropping a flare…?
The excuses are getting more and more farfetched.
rip 6.7 sweden, it was fun while it lasted.
I think it should be 6.7 if giving full stabilizer. but should be giving spotting regardless of any other changes.
An uptiered ASA with no indicator of where the lock is from, and the inability to fly defensively to anything?
My reasoning for this is when the IRIAF gets downtiered to face 11.7-12.0 aircraft bud, I dont’ die to fakours in general. I would die to them far more often if I had to face them in jets that can’t even see the fakour on their RWR however… on much worse platforms at that than what is at 12.7+
You literally admitted to wanting to kill the su34 just because you were just butthurt about the IRIAF so idk whats so funny
1 Like
agreed, rather seem stuff moved up in general. my BR change suggestion is based on what Gaijin is doing at the moment and really what if best for the overall BR placement.
Some people aren’t getting it and keep requesting more compression.