I’m aware. That’s why I use Aim-54As on the F-14B
Seems to be a MASSIVE compression issue.
But its the same for the IRIAF flying against Eurofighter/Su-27SM.
Do you complain about compression of the BRs? Then go and request this?
No. T-2K is fine. Stop advocating for MASS compression of the game’s BRs. Next you will ask for 7.7 MIG-15s.
we need a 12.3 for ground
Wellcome to WT
The only Difference between F-1 and T-2 is that T-2 has 2 less missiles and better performance bc of lighter airframe
best subsonic airframe
What exactly is the value of being the best subsonic airframe in a match with supersonic airplanes?
Like being the best 100m sprinter in a 200m race.
yeah but having no lineup at 11.3 just makes u take it to 12.0…
- Ground RB, Super Etendard. 10.3 > 10.7. This changes makes this plane now unplayable because of the lineups offered in the ground tree. The plane is already forcing you to uptier yourself playing the very fun 9.7 lineup. An example: You want to play the tiger helicopter at 10.0 you uptier your 9.7 lineup to 10.0 to accommodate. You then want a capable CAS plane so you uptier yourself again to 10.3 to use the Etendard or the jaguars. With this change you’ll now force yourself to fully uptier yourself every single game with the possibility of playing against 11.7. Now we get to a whole other issue of the etendard not being able to defend itself at all at 11.7 in an uptier. The plane simply isn’t fast enough since its not an afterburning jet. The bracket of 10.3 is the best spot for this plane where it will get destroyed at 11.3 and sadly this goes the other way of it destroying everything else at 9.3. At 10.7 this plane will be virtually useless and the only company you can use at that BR is one lone 2a4 leopard. Thats not playable.
IF your RWR can even detect it, which it often can’t, because you are asking for it to continue facing 11.7s!
What part of “the issue are the downtiers” is not getting through that thicc skull?
I don’t think that is an answer related to aircraft performance unless you forgot to paste an actual reply. Did the IRIAF hurt you that much?
Except by humoring their suggestions and shaping your suggestions around it you give them a thumbs up to continue doing it.
air rb, r2y2’s. 8.0 > 7.7/7.3. One of the slowest jets at it’s br, legacy stats from before it’s bomber spawn that was removed, guns nerfed. if not moved before being removed, it will keep it’s legacy stats and stay at a br that it is not fit for.
Wellcome to WT
I’m aware the issue exists elsewhere, it shouldn’t repeat simply because of this. That isn’t a valid excuse.
The only Difference between F-1 and T-2 is that T-2 has 2 less missiles and better performance bc of lighter airframe
That’s all the difference it needs. It will stay 10.0.
T-2 is difficult to play, but with correct play its a perfectly capable plane at 9.7. use rockets as flares, worked fine for me after i got the hang of it.
same goes for the F-1, its has 2 more 9Ps it deserves 10.0.
Lmao “Save the BR bracket” like the IRIAF is some unbeatable, uncounterable, invincible force that can’t be stopped. You’ve accused others about gross biases, but this is by far the most clear case of a gross bias I’ve ever seen.
no! aim-9p at 9.3 it’s way to op and will ruin 9.0 and 9.3 with ver often down tiers
What exactly is the value of being the best subsonic airframe in a match with supersonic airplanes?
it’s almost like the ariete wins a dogfight against literally 100% of the jets in its matchmaking pool and the only thing keeping it from actually just destroying the matchmaker is that SOME jets it faces, SOME, can run away from it currently!
Then people like you want to downtier it so that it only faces supersonics in full uptiers so it can stomp.
I don’t think that is an answer related to aircraft performance unless you forgot to paste an actual reply. Did the IRIAF hurt you that much?
??? I’m saying it WOULDN’T PERFORM and that’s *ok., because the greater good is what I’m going for.