Put the Su-34 at 13.7. (8 AMRAAMS) Fine with me.
GRB at 14.0 (12.0)
happy?
I agree and/or getting the air spawn will be nice.
it has an advantage of small size and irst radar which cannot be detected by aircraft, but when compared to anti airs with cannons + AA missiles(zsu-23-4m4 & pgz-04) i agree its worse. that being said those should go up in br, not ozelot going down.
This is not a requirement I will honor. USA crybabies do not factor. They cry about any negative change to USA vehicles. What do you actually want me to list here?
1 Like
And by itself isn’t that good enough but being only .3 br up is WILD, Missile Tunnan NEEDS to get his br down.
And one more post to save another heavy bomber
Vehicle: B-29A-BN
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 7.0 ----> 6.3
Reason: the main problem of B-29 is its turrets. M2 are OK against late props, but they are useless, if you face something higher.
1 Like
Attempted move of Su-7Bs, it was such a bad idea they decided to not go through with it and listened to the posts about it. So rather than trying to nerf other vehicles just submit feedback about yours like these people did.
That’s not something that even should be considered regarding a vehicles’ BR placement…
F20 must be 11.0
Homie i dont play USA.
I have the IRIAF and was using it before they’ve now moved it up TWICE
It will now be unusable. Congrats.
Not like we haven’t seen this before with the F4F ICE, Tornado IDS (event) etc etc.
Nice try tho with the USA point.
Ground RB, type 90 (all of them) 11.3 > 11.7. It is the most powerful 11.7 vehicle in the game that sits at 11.3, almost every single battle type90 faces leopard2a4 filled teams and well, like I said it is overall better than any 11.7 tank.
1 Like
Vehicle in question: JH-7A in ARB/GRB
ARB BR: 12.3 to 11.7
GRB BR: 11.7 to 11.3
Decent plane but overtiered compared to other CAS especially in that role. Only 2 F&F AGM is pretty bad plus its low lock on range. As a CAS platform it is arguably inferior to the Su-24M with better AGM in better quantity. As a fighter, it gets 4 decent AAMs but is placed in a BR where IRCCM and HMD becomes common and it has neither of them.
Issues also needs to be adressed with it receiving 4 Kh-29TDs, or PL-5EIIs.
5 Likes
Too far because it destroys props easily… jets are just very problematic. 6.7 would be fine.
1 Like
Vehicle: F-104s
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 11.3 ----> 11.0
Reason: recent nerfs to its airframe and the removal of its cannon to take the aim-7e making it difficult to keep up and less or equal to the mig-23m. With the poor short and long range performance of the aim-7e with a maximal radar lock range of 4km making it difficult to use.
4 Likes
Just a correction, it’s designated as A32A. I made the same suggestion, thank you.
I didn’t say you did?!?!?
Again, preferable to it stomping in downtiers in a way that other 12.7s do not even start to approach.
Try… once? It was never 12.3.
I knew the secound I saw the BR changes that it wasn’t enough and 1500 responses in under 12 hours proves that.
M1A1/IPM1, T-80UM2 and Merkava Mk.3s face downtiers pretty often as well, its just that 11.3 is more inclined to get downtiers. The type 90 is sure better than them but not by enough significance to make it one notch higher.
You are NOT okay with this, but OKAY with Su-34 stomping GRB at top tier…?
OKAY with the Pantsir dominating air for almost 2 years now?
But now since its the IRIAF, you have an issue with it…?
Ground RB, stormer AD. 10.0 > 9.7. its a gepard 1A2 with worse guns, armor and speed, but with a few more of the same AA missiles.
it does not compare to the destructive power of the LAV-AD, no point it with being at the same br.
1 Like