Planned Battle Rating Changes for February 2025

@Morvran
I have still open 47 and fixed 19, not a bug beeing 10

2 Likes

When are these changes gonna be applied? thanks

Might aswell put a bullet in the head to the israeli techtree the Namar moved to 11.3 while 2S38 sits at 10.3. The lahatut moved to 9.0 kills the 8.7 lineup which already suffered loss of the A4E (Early) being stuck with a terrible aircraft agaist gepards and now a flareless helicopter is out of place BR wise facing SPAAs with IR missiles while being flareless and with 4 slow ass tows doesnt help that 9.0 - 9.7 faces a stupid amount of uptiers because there is more 10.0 - 10.7 premiums then there is people on this planet for christ sake. So please for the love of god fix the ARMOUR for the merkava hulls to justify their BR and keep the Lahatut at 8.7 which is perfectly fine were it is.

3 Likes

What about the other part?

And what makes the Su-34 good enough to be moved up in BR? Please try and ignore the nations that these planes come from, because it is distracting you from balance.

Air RB, Shenyang F-5: 9.3 > 9.0. It’s already on the back foot versus practically everything it can face. The Mig-21MF & SMT moving down is going to make it completely unplayable with their R60s. The fact that the Mig-19, a straight up better plane in every way, is at 9.3 is also indicative that it should move down.

3 Likes

Realistic Ground

Namer Tsrikhon

11>10.7

Reason:
The Tsrikhon is much worse than the Puma VJTF. It is slower, bigger, worse armored, less survivable post pen, and a worse shell. The CE protection of the Puma sides is basically equal to trophy as well. only way to kill either is hit it from top with CE. It is worse in literally every way, there is no reason to make its BR higher (as planned) or even equal to the PUMA VJTF.

2 Likes

Please add an additional lineup rotation for ground SB. There is too much compression in the “top” 3 lineups… 9_2, 10_2 & 11_2

that would mean su-25 and su-25k would be more approptiate at 11 and not 10.3 aswell

Put the Su-34 at 13.7. (8 AMRAAMS) Fine with me.
GRB at 14.0 (12.0)
happy?

I agree and/or getting the air spawn will be nice.

it has an advantage of small size and irst radar which cannot be detected by aircraft, but when compared to anti airs with cannons + AA missiles(zsu-23-4m4 & pgz-04) i agree its worse. that being said those should go up in br, not ozelot going down.

This is not a requirement I will honor. USA crybabies do not factor. They cry about any negative change to USA vehicles. What do you actually want me to list here?

1 Like

And by itself isn’t that good enough but being only .3 br up is WILD, Missile Tunnan NEEDS to get his br down.

And one more post to save another heavy bomber
Vehicle: B-29A-BN
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 7.0 ----> 6.3
Reason: the main problem of B-29 is its turrets. M2 are OK against late props, but they are useless, if you face something higher.

1 Like

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vTH5Aj3PUo9FfpfTwt2d-cv7pejjf4cQSttcDTP83XUNIr9283Cn4OEtbJ0579LAokhEglvalVUUbDB/pubhtml#

Attempted move of Su-7Bs, it was such a bad idea they decided to not go through with it and listened to the posts about it. So rather than trying to nerf other vehicles just submit feedback about yours like these people did.

That’s not something that even should be considered regarding a vehicles’ BR placement…

F20 must be 11.0

Homie i dont play USA.

I have the IRIAF and was using it before they’ve now moved it up TWICE

It will now be unusable. Congrats.
Not like we haven’t seen this before with the F4F ICE, Tornado IDS (event) etc etc.

Nice try tho with the USA point.

Ground RB, type 90 (all of them) 11.3 > 11.7. It is the most powerful 11.7 vehicle in the game that sits at 11.3, almost every single battle type90 faces leopard2a4 filled teams and well, like I said it is overall better than any 11.7 tank.

Vehicle in question: JH-7A in ARB/GRB
ARB BR: 12.3 to 11.7
GRB BR: 11.7 to 11.3
Decent plane but overtiered compared to other CAS especially in that role. Only 2 F&F AGM is pretty bad plus its low lock on range. As a CAS platform it is arguably inferior to the Su-24M with better AGM in better quantity. As a fighter, it gets 4 decent AAMs but is placed in a BR where IRCCM and HMD becomes common and it has neither of them.
Issues also needs to be adressed with it receiving 4 Kh-29TDs, or PL-5EIIs.

5 Likes