Decompression >>> more downtiers
Sqv Sea harrier was at 11.3 facing the IRAF for a few months, and it’s still overtiered in sim too.
And it’s still countered. Every single nation in the game deserves an AA on par or better than the pantsir in my opinion.
2 Likes
PUMA VJTF
GRB 11.0 → 10.7
No lineup, Spikes that don’t work well, and tracks that blow off when spikes are shot (making you a free kill). This thing deserves to be 10.7, as does the KF41, but rules are rules, because of how much better the Vilkas and other spike carriers at 10.7 are.
And before anyone mentions its armor, don’t, it only stops HEATFS, something you 9/10 times are not going to see.
5 Likes
Vehicle in question: Chinese top tier MBT family(99A, WZ, VT4) in GRB/GAB/GSB
BR change: 12.0 to 11.7
Simply not top tier capable, and the mobility threw off attributes that deserves criticizing, such as low pen, abbysmal ROF and lack of spall liners. Should be lowered.
Alternatively, buff the rate of fire to 6.5 seconds bare minimum.
8 Likes
MELLS doesn’t work either.
There’s about 15 different reports for the Puma that are just sitting open.
100% move down.
Ground RB, T95E1. 8.3 > 8.0. slow reload, unreliable armor and no stab or laser at 8.3, what else do i need to say?
also i think its supposed to have composite armor in its front plate?
1 Like
Lemme count what I have on my list xD
3 Likes
I agree. yet we still haven’t gotten them, and the Pantsir has been out since March 2023. LMFAO
Vehicle in question: Merkava Mk.4B/4LIC in GRB/GAB/GSB
BR: 12.0 to 11.7
Nothing too bad but plays worse compared to other western MBTs. Large profile hinders potential for aggressive gameplay and potential kill via breech limits defensive playstyle.
1 Like
“SKY GUARDIANS”
the ONLY sky guardian was the PANTSIR LMFAO
i think laser rangefinder vs no laser should be always at least a .3br step with “tank cannon” tanks.
You are correct, however stock aircraft are at a disadvantage no matter what BR they are in. Only when fully spaded can they be considered fully competitive at that BR. It was hard enough to try and spade the IRIAF at 12.7, its going to be impossible at 13.0.
When are these changes gonna be applied? thanks
Might aswell put a bullet in the head to the israeli techtree the Namar moved to 11.3 while 2S38 sits at 10.3. The lahatut moved to 9.0 kills the 8.7 lineup which already suffered loss of the A4E (Early) being stuck with a terrible aircraft agaist gepards and now a flareless helicopter is out of place BR wise facing SPAAs with IR missiles while being flareless and with 4 slow ass tows doesnt help that 9.0 - 9.7 faces a stupid amount of uptiers because there is more 10.0 - 10.7 premiums then there is people on this planet for christ sake. So please for the love of god fix the ARMOUR for the merkava hulls to justify their BR and keep the Lahatut at 8.7 which is perfectly fine were it is.
3 Likes
What about the other part?
And what makes the Su-34 good enough to be moved up in BR? Please try and ignore the nations that these planes come from, because it is distracting you from balance.
Air RB, Shenyang F-5: 9.3 > 9.0. It’s already on the back foot versus practically everything it can face. The Mig-21MF & SMT moving down is going to make it completely unplayable with their R60s. The fact that the Mig-19, a straight up better plane in every way, is at 9.3 is also indicative that it should move down.
3 Likes
Realistic Ground
Namer Tsrikhon
11>10.7
Reason:
The Tsrikhon is much worse than the Puma VJTF. It is slower, bigger, worse armored, less survivable post pen, and a worse shell. The CE protection of the Puma sides is basically equal to trophy as well. only way to kill either is hit it from top with CE. It is worse in literally every way, there is no reason to make its BR higher (as planned) or even equal to the PUMA VJTF.
2 Likes
Please add an additional lineup rotation for ground SB. There is too much compression in the “top” 3 lineups… 9_2, 10_2 & 11_2
that would mean su-25 and su-25k would be more approptiate at 11 and not 10.3 aswell