Planned Battle Rating Changes for February 2025

Too far because it destroys props easily… jets are just very problematic. 6.7 would be fine.

1 Like

Vehicle: F-104s
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 11.3 ----> 11.0
Reason: recent nerfs to its airframe and the removal of its cannon to take the aim-7e making it difficult to keep up and less or equal to the mig-23m. With the poor short and long range performance of the aim-7e with a maximal radar lock range of 4km making it difficult to use.

4 Likes

Just a correction, it’s designated as A32A. I made the same suggestion, thank you.

I didn’t say you did?!?!?

Again, preferable to it stomping in downtiers in a way that other 12.7s do not even start to approach.

Try… once? It was never 12.3.

I knew the secound I saw the BR changes that it wasn’t enough and 1500 responses in under 12 hours proves that.

M1A1/IPM1, T-80UM2 and Merkava Mk.3s face downtiers pretty often as well, its just that 11.3 is more inclined to get downtiers. The type 90 is sure better than them but not by enough significance to make it one notch higher.

You are NOT okay with this, but OKAY with Su-34 stomping GRB at top tier…?
OKAY with the Pantsir dominating air for almost 2 years now?

But now since its the IRIAF, you have an issue with it…?

Ground RB, stormer AD. 10.0 > 9.7. its a gepard 1A2 with worse guns, armor and speed, but with a few more of the same AA missiles.
it does not compare to the destructive power of the LAV-AD, no point it with being at the same br.

1 Like

Air Realistic Battles
F-16A (USA)
12.7 > 12.3
Reasoning: Very low amount of countermeasures to counter R-73, Fox-3 and AIM9Ms
AIM-9L very under-powered for 12.7

1 Like

That was proposed in the table

Gaijin, when the feedback and final changes thread is announced and I go into the table for it I better see a wall of red like this

Decompression is urgently needed, you knew it there and you know it now. Please, it is strangling the game.

Why is the IPM1 even at the BR it’s at isn’t it like a worse abram’s becuase of the 105??

Ground RB, XM-1(GM) 9.3 > 9.0. There is exact same vehicle XM-1 Chrysler that stays at 9.0 while XM-1 (GM) is at 9.3. It’s unfair. Plain and simple.

The MAA-1 is no better then the aim9L tbh. after 1.5km the aim-9L is way better :/
And targeting planes in dogfights with the LITENING pod for the eegs is a mess aswell :/

Vehicle: F-104G (all with flares)
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 11.0 ----> 10.7
Reason: with recent airframe nerfs and compared to other 11.0 jets like the Mig21bis, the F104G is undesired compared to other options at 11.0 BR.

7 Likes

Leclerc (all variants) 12.0 —> 11.7
Leclercs have a big problem which is their round. OFL 120 F1 has barely any spall, the shell often disappears after penetrating the tank’s weak spots. Leclercs also lack armor compared to Leopards or T-80BVM/T-90M. Leclerc can get penetrated practically everywhere by DM53.
My suggestion is, either bring Leclercs down by 0.3 BR or give them DM53 so we could have actually usable round.

1 Like

thats no reason to down BR a perfectly good vehicle. m18 is a very good vehicle at 6.0.

The missile and the bomb loudout is even worse then the amx 10.7 -.-

It is tho. I’ve played both m1a1 and type90 and trust me I’d chose type90 over anything at 11.3 - 11.7

Air RB, F-16A OCU, 13.7 > 13.3. If the barak II gets to go to 13.3 while being the same as the OCU but with better CMs and a HMD. I see no reason why the OCU shouldnt also go down (unless yall update it to the block 20 wich idk that would be fun)

1 Like