@Smin1080p_WT, here is my change request.
Ground RB: Merkava Mk.3: (all variants) 11.3 → 11.0 , reload time (spaded and aced) 6.0 seconds → 5.0 seconds and armor values increased by 90% or Merkava Mk.3 (all variants) 11.3 → 10.7. Reason: the Mk.3 is heavily underperforming, having much lower armor values than reality that happen to be the worst by far at 11.3, combined with a decent gun and mediocre mobility. It is compareable to vehicles like the Leopard 2A4, not the Type 90!
1 Like
I can understand that the canb mk2 may be understood as potentially too good(I dont agree however), but for the Tu-14T id assume they just forgot it existed.
ARB, Su-27SM (Russia). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. 12.7 aircraft not already going up in BR should not face the current 13.7 aircraft.
@Smin1080p_WT Smin
Ground RB, Namer Tsrikhon: 11.0 → 10.3 or more Spike missiles added, armor buffed by 80% and Spike launcher allowed to be elevated and depressed; the vehicle moved to rank 7, folded after Namer RCWS-30, RP and SL costs of both the vehicle and it’s modifications changed to fit the new position in the tech-tree. The vehicle is severly underperforming, having only 4 unreliable ATGMs that cannot hit any target below 300 meters away as it’s only weapon capable of destroying MBTs. It also has much worse armor and mobility than most vehicles at it’s BR.
2 Likes
ARB, Su-34 (Russia). 13.3>13.7
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is just in keeping with those movements. 12.3 aircraft not already going up in BR should not face the Fullback.
2 Likes
Idk, i didn’t make the changes but i personally dont think it will be any more of a menace than the F104’s (i dont have an opinion on the A so idc if it goes up or down.)
ARB, MiG-29SMT (Russia). 13.3>13.7
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. 12.3 aircraft not already going up in BR should not face the current 13.3 aircraft.
1 Like
Ground RB, Canberra B Mk 2. 8.3 > 8.0. Pretty sure this should also be reduced in BR with the other variants as it doesnt even have guns.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT
Air RB, Kfir C.7: 12.0 → 11.3 . The Kfir C.7 is also underperforming, having to deal with ARH missiles slingers and 4th generation fighters all the time, while only having 4 AAMs at maximum, none of which are radar-guided, having no radar lock, having a bad RWR, only 36 countermeasures and terrible stock AAMs.
1 Like
Please don’t ping Smin for every BR suggestion
7 Likes
i think tiger 2 P is fine at 6.7
ARB, JAS-39C (Sweden). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
2 Likes
ARB, JAS-39C (Japan). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
1 Like
ARB, JAS-39C (Italy). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
1 Like
The T29 has a 30mm RHA spall shield though
2 Likes
ARB, F-16A Block 15 (France). 13.0>13.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
1 Like
ARB, F-16AM (France). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
1 Like
You have never played the CR3, or any challenger tank at all
Mirage 2000C is quite competent at 12.3 but does not need to face Fox 3 carriers.
That Mirage 2000C S4 is to stay at 12.3 is a obvious clue. A slight difference in the total amount of countermeasures does not require a Br change.
Both aircraft should be at the same Br and that is where S4 is kept.
Is the seperation based on statistics I wonder?
The aircraft are the same in everything but the total amount of countermeasures while many people started France on the S4.
2 Likes
ARB, Mirage 2000-5F (France). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.