You have never played the CR3, or any challenger tank at all
Mirage 2000C is quite competent at 12.3 but does not need to face Fox 3 carriers.
That Mirage 2000C S4 is to stay at 12.3 is a obvious clue. A slight difference in the total amount of countermeasures does not require a Br change.
Both aircraft should be at the same Br and that is where S4 is kept.
Is the seperation based on statistics I wonder?
The aircraft are the same in everything but the total amount of countermeasures while many people started France on the S4.
2 Likes
ARB, Mirage 2000-5F (France). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
I suppose gajin might decompression max BR to 14.3 (Air AB, RB & SB) for aircraft top tier in the next quarter (may or june)
Battle rating in ground mode (AB, RB & SB) 12.7 > 13.3 for aircraft top tier
USAF F-15A only stay 13.0
F-15A Baz decrease BR to 12.7, AIM-7F exchange AIM-7M but AIM-9J to replace AIM-9M
JF-17A (Blk I & 2) and JF-17C never armed MICA IR
For JF-17C mounted PL-10E
F-15I Ra’am change to 15.0 if gajin add Python 5
But F-22A Early would be 14.7 because none AIM-9X (Blk 1) and JHMCS
1 Like
No tanks in the British tree deserves 12.0. CR2E/2BN arent even 11.3 worthy in certain standards. The CR3 can be 12.0 only if it gets 1500hp, blowout panel and 5sec reload like most western MBTs.
2 Likes
Removal of R-27ER from MiG-29 9.12/G in exchange for R-73 while the Br is retained.
1 Like
ARB, Rafale C F3 (France). 14.0>14.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
No. No. Nah. The CR3 has one and only quality with its DM53 and nothing else. For it to be 12.0 worthy it has to get 5s ready rack, blowout and get back its 1500 prototype engine, bare minimum. We also gotta talk about the CR2 with gimmicks. They needs to go down as well.
1 Like
ARB, F-16C (USA). 13.7>14.0
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
See I dont understand the spilt BR for ground and air battles as it seems like the only thing it accomplished was screwing up line-ups. I don’t see how this was a long requested change. Especially when ground vehicles only to go 12.0 too.
ARB, Typhoon GR.4 (Britain). 14.0>14.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
1 Like
AH-1W reduce combat rating 11.0>10.7
Argumentation: This helicopter is inferior in almost everything to the Mi-35m, which is at 10.7.
And ± is equal to Lynx AH.Mk1 (G-Lynx), as well as T129. And in terms of air resistance capabilities, it is inferior to all of the above.
P.S. Sorry for the machine translation.
ARB, F-2000A Typhoon (Italy). 14.0>14.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
ARB, EF-2000 Typhoon (Germany). 14.0>14.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
ARB, F-15E Strike Eagle (USA). 14.0>14.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
I recommend a BR of 14.7 for these top of the line aircraft.
1 Like
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Namer (All models)
Change: Increase the number of SPIKE missiles from 4 to 8 and/or give it additional main armament ammo storage in the hull.
Reasoning: Currently, if your turret gets shot in either Namer, you’re completely screwed because all of your ammo is now gone.
2 Likes
ARB, F-15I (Israel). 14.0>14.3
BR 12.7 upwards is in dire need of further decompression. Most aircraft starting from BR 12.7 need to be adjusted upward by at least one, if not two, increments. This is in furtherance of that goal.
So do I, honestly, but I think the devs will be more receptive to a more gradual, incremental change. Trying to be realistic with expectations.
I don’t think that’s a fair comparison at all, the Tiger ll has a single flat 185mm the T29 has several layers which significantly reduce the area you can pen.
Paired with the large muzzle break the area you can pen is small.
Then the turret side armor is 160mm, which can easily go over 300mm at angles, the Tiger has 80mm of armor.
Also the T29 has charges in the turret cheeks that HEAT has a far easier time setting off than the Tigers ammo which is in the back of the turret.
How is that easier to do for the T29? You will hit the Tiger ll ammo every time from the front, side and rear.
And with the T29s massive breech, it’s survival rate goes way up because side shots struggle to hit all the crew, plus with the crew separation it’s very unlikely to one shot the crew.
4 Likes