Not done yet
ARB/GRB, F15I . 14> 14.3
Again massively better than every 13.3
that wasn’t the point of the question, the date was to throw yall off, the answer is the f14 because on 9/11 the f-16’s that got scrambled didn’t even get enough time to be armed at all before being put into the air
regardless of it having no radar missiles… its still an F16 which btw the A model is the best air frame for
manoeuvring, with x 6 aim9Ls… its going to be absolutely abused , and im glad i just unlocked it xD
almost convinced me to crew my F-14A/Bs
The F14 is a good platform, but not while itll be sucked into gen 4.5 fighters…
Also we not gonna question the mig21 MF going down?
Vehicle Name: Challenger 3TD
BR Change: 11.7 → 12.0
Reasoning:
The Challenger 3TD is currently under-tiered at 11.7. It has access to the same 652 mm penetration APFSDS rounds as the Leopard 2A7, giving it top-tier firepower that outclasses many vehicles at its current BR. Additionally, its armor and mobility are comparable to the Challenger 2E, which is already at 12.0. While the 3TD lacks Spall Liner, this alone does not justify its lower BR, as many other 12.0 vehicles also lack this feature. To maintain balance and consistency in the British tech tree, the Challenger 3TD should be moved to 12.0.
Adding ahistorical HMD over a historical countermeasure fix has to be some sort of cruel joke…
lucky I only got the f4j recently
That just is not true at all.
The CR3 TD engine got nerfed a while ago.
the challanger 3 TD is actually worse than the baseline CR2 now, its reload is worse, its survivability is worse , its mobility is comparable, it lacks a roof MG.
All it has is that DM53.
No it should not be 12.0.
They have lists, literalyl hundreds if not thousands of reports long.
its beyond a joke how they treat it now.
Br wise we need more decompression not re compression
decompression would have to take into account all of the game modes air ground and naval
Ground>AIR/HELI>NAVAl
GRB M1A2 abrams- 11.7 > 12.0
This tank is substantially better than most of, if not all other 11.7s in the game.
It shares literally everything the same with the 12.0 versions of the tank APART from optics.
It is inexcusably under BR’d. while the leopard 2a5 is 12.0. the WZ1001 is 12.0 , leclercs, Cr2s ,arietes, merkavas.
What? decompression literally is needed across the board.
Air would be first due to the game being an air craft game initially.
Then ground as it has a large player base then naval.
The fact is, ground RB is clogged up with compression so stuff that is 10.3 absolutely dogs on 9.7s and 9.3s , and if they go up to 11.3 they get dogged on.
Youve got tanks like the T32, IS4M and 7.7 heavies going off against stuff like the ZTZ59D1, chieftain, T62 etc which demolish them.
For ARB i dont even need to go there.
The fact the mig21 MF is moving down is about to cause a whole new level of comrpession, same with the mig 21 Bis’s
Lets not talk about the 14.0s that are insanely oppressive to anything that isnt one of them, and the fact we now have to see stuff like the J35D sit at a lower BR than the hunter F6 xD
Yup, it doesn’t unless you make 0 effort.
Yak-3VK requires vary basic MEC and for minimal power loss you get non-overheating powerhouse.
Spitfire has to lose extremely large portion of its power to not overheat, and even then radiators absolutely kill your speed.
Similar story with oil overheating simulator known as Ta-152H. Around 5000-6000m you have to lose like 200HP if you want your oil to stop heating up, while your water remains relatively cold, and you need severe radiators to achieve that, that kill your already mediocre speed.
VK is way faster and requires way less effort and performance sacrifice to keep cool.
Also it beats Ta-152H in a dogfight everywhere but rolling scissors and even there the best Ta can do is to stall the fight till oil overheats.
Of course on winter maps it gets way better for Spit and Ta, yet even vs almost 100% power Spitfire (as even on Wwinter maps LF has to make sacrifices) 3Yak can easily win due to speed, guns and energy generation/retention.
yes…BUT, balancing all that takes time
no, that’s not how it works, nor is it necessarily true
ahhhh, so you agree with me on my above statement…
sooo your mad that the mig 21 can finally see a historical adversary the f4…C ?
The G8N1 should not be moved up, it should stay or moved down. 6.0 to → 5.7
Reason: This bomber often faces jets which is helpless against, it’s very slow compared to everything at it’s current BR, unable to bomb bases, which themselves are really bulky against this bomber.
F-104A
Change: 9.3 → 9.7 ARB
The 9.3 F-104s are notoriously oppressive and annoying against the 8.3 sub-sonics, with their godly acceleration and top speed at that BR. I feel bumping them up to 9.7 would give 8.3 aircraft room to breathe.
The early F-104s can still use their top speed to remain competitive in the now potential 10.7 up tier. But it would mean that they would have to play more carefully.
8.7 aircraft would have a much easier time being able to deal with the F-104, as in many trees this is the “last” of the sub-sonic fighters. With some already transitioning to super-sonics. It would also mean that the F-104s would face equal aircraft more often.
These aircraft have no business being at this BR currently.
F-104C
Change: 9.3 → 9.7 ARB
The 9.3 F-104s are notoriously oppressive and annoying against the 8.3 sub-sonics, with their godly acceleration and top speed at that BR. I feel bumping them up to 9.7 would give 8.3 aircraft room to breathe.
The early F-104s can still use their top speed to remain competitive in the now potential 10.7 up tier. But it would mean that they would have to play more carefully.
8.7 aircraft would have a much easier time being able to deal with the F-104, as in many trees this is the “last” of the sub-sonic fighters. With some already transitioning to super-sonics. It would also mean that the F-104s would face equal aircraft more often.
These aircraft have no business being at this BR currently. The F-104C especially puzzles me because while it does marginally trade some engine power, it has access to an RWR. It is a side-grade, but this thing should have been 9.7 to begin with because it can detect radar locks.
F-104A (China)
Change: 9.3 → 9.7 ARB
The 9.3 F-104s are notoriously oppressive and annoying against the 8.3 sub-sonics, with their godly acceleration and top speed at that BR. I feel bumping them up to 9.7 would give 8.3 aircraft room to breathe.
The early F-104s can still use their top speed to remain competitive in the now potential 10.7 up tier. But it would mean that they would have to play more carefully.
8.7 aircraft would have a much easier time being able to deal with the F-104, as in many trees this is the “last” of the sub-sonic fighters. With some already transitioning to super-sonics. It would also mean that the F-104s would face equal aircraft more often.
These aircraft have no business being at this BR currently. Not in any tree.